The crowd was ready. The delivery, as always, was masterful. But in the end, President Obama's nomination acceptance speech spoke more for what it wasn't, in fact, than what it was.
Republican nominee Mitt Romney has made a habit of criticizing Obama's habit of criticizing America on foreign shores. Many political observers -- including the Tampa Bay Times' respected PolitiCheck columnists -- found Romney's claims grossly distorted. Naturally, conservative groups such as the Heritage Foundation disagree.
Nevertheless, for someone so willing to acknowledge prior administrative policy failures, Obama found little fault with himself or his way of doing business over the past nearly-four years -- with the exception of not doing a better job selling his narrative to the American people.
Perhaps America has become accustomed to his extraordinary prowess on the stump. To me, his speech sounded like leftover meatloaf -- satisfying when fresh out of the oven yesterday, but warmed over grease today.
Obama made his biggest mistake of the campaign by using the convention to energize his base. He didn't need to energize the crowd -- they were already pumped from Joe Biden's terrific speech, which visibly moved Michelle Obama, and the fascinating entry of San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro into the national consciousness.
What he needed to do was sway Independent voters. And I don't think he got the job done.
Wouldn't it have been so much more refreshing to hear him acknowledge that America is not in a better place than it was when he was first elected?
Unemployment is 8.1 percent. Food and gas prices are the highest they've ever been. Housing is in the toilet. The Middle East and Europe threaten our welfare, as does China.
(And -- by the way -- those 4.5 million jobs? Do yourself a favor and fact check that number. It's just a big, fat quarter-truth.)
Perhaps it would have been wiser for him to take a different tack in his nomination speech than when he was first elected. Obama's failure to cultivate relationships inside Congress -- highlighted by his hiring of assertive-is-putting-it-mildly Rahm Emanuel and his arrogant hey-we-won-the-election-so-back-off style of dealmaking -- made it difficult for him to get anything done, even when the Democrats controlled Congress.
Here's what's now the worst-kept secret in town: I voted for Obama in 2008. Although I liked and respected McCain (I still do), I couldn't tolerate his choice of Sarah Palin for VP. At the time I thought: 'This is your first decision under pressure, and she's the best you can do?' Plus, it smacked of pandering, which I find insulting.
But I digress.
I voted for Obama because I desperately wanted to see his vision of America come true. A more tolerant, less aggressive US of A. But things are worse now than they've ever been, and when I think that 11 years ago our Congressmen and women stood on the steps of the Capitol and sang God Bless America impromptu, I know that Obama is not the man to bridge this nation's deep ideological divide.
And this is his deepest failure. The varnish on this cool customer and undeniably brilliant community organizer who made hope and change sound so good is faded and scratched. Obama's inability to admit that his administration has made any mistakes, and the stubborn insistence that we are better off now than we were four years ago, demeans the intelligence of the man on the street.
I guess what I'm saying is, if the Democrats have to spend three days convincing America that Americans are better off, then we probably aren't.