23 Aug 2014
65° Partly Cloudy
Patch Instagram photo by legallyblonde27
Patch Instagram photo by legallyblonde27
Patch Instagram photo by ermyceap
Patch Instagram photo by taratesimu
Patch Instagram photo by taratesimu
Patch Instagram photo by lilyava299
Patch Instagram photo by _mollfairhurst
Patch Instagram photo by thecontemporaryhannah
Patch Instagram photo by lucyketch

Fine Print: Safe Playing Field Act

Proposed measure restricts the use of pesticides and other poisons where kids play.

Fine Print: Safe Playing Field Act

What it is: The proposed Safe Playing Field Act places new restrictions on the use of pesticides on elementary school and childcare center playgrounds and fields. Sponsored by state Sens. Shirley Turner (D-Mercer) and Robert Gordon (D-Bergen), the  Senate Bill S-1143 was unanimously endorsed by the Senate environmental committee last week.

What it means: The bill has been supported through a loud and active public campaign, with supporters lobbying hard in the Statehouse and canvassers going door to door in some communities to urge residents to press its passage. But despite the apparent political support, the measure has had a tough time reaching final passage.

Voting record: A version of this bill passed once in the Senate last year, but not the Assembly. And while a compromise version was introduced and approved in the Senate committee this week, some supporters say the Senate’s Democratic leadership has yet to agree to post for final vote.

Turner’s prediction: “I’m hoping we’ll get it posted in January when we come back. We have gotten this out of committee before, so we have had to start over. But I hope we can get it done in January.”

What’s in the way: Most of the opposition has come from the chemical, pesticide, and landscaping industries, which maintain that there are misconceptions as to the health hazards and applications of pesticides in such settings.

Industry perspective: “Perceptions being put forward by very concerned mothers who are not aware of the very strict guidelines that are set by the EPA,” said Nancy Sadlon, executive director of the  NJ Green Industry Council. “Nobody is arguing that these aren’t toxic substances, but what we don’t agree on is that there is, in fact, a lot of testing and training with these products.”

Turner’s retort: “We don’t need the chemicals to accomplish what we want. And the most important of course is to protect the health and safety of our children, and we can do that with alternative methods. We heard that over and over in testimony.”

Compromise: The latest version of the bill did step back on the scope of the measure, removing nonschool public recreation fields and playgrounds from those areas where pesticides would be banned.

Continue reading on  NJSpotlight.com.

NJ Spotlight is an issue-driven news website that provides critical insight to New Jersey’s communities and businesses. It is non-partisan, independent, policy-centered and community-minded.

Share This Article