Crime & Safety
AG Files Open Government Lawsuit Against Western Coventry Fire District
The fire district allegedly failed to file timely meeting minutes on numerous occasions, even after a warning from the AG's office.

Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin today filed an open government lawsuit in Rhode Island Superior Court against the Western Coventry Fire district alleging the district violated the Open Meetings Act by not timely filing meeting minutes.
The fire district posted the unofficial minutes for its Sept. 18 2014 meeting on Oct. 14 β five days after they should have posted them, the AG said in a release.
In June of 2014, the AGβs office found the district had failed to post minutes in a timely fashion seven times. At the time, officials from the district reportedly said they were unaware they were subjected to both the Open Meetings Act and the Access to Public Records ACt.
Find out what's happening in Coventryfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The AG did not find the district had wilfully violated the OMA then, but said that their finding last summer βserved as notice that the conduct was unlawful and may serve as evidence of a willful or knowing violation in any similar future situation.β
The AGβs office issued a finding against the district in March after a complaint was filed (Novak v. Western Coventry Fire District) by Kent C. Novak, who alleged that the district was late to file minutes 11 times in 2014, including repeated instances after the June 2014 warning from the AGβs office.
Find out what's happening in Coventryfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The lawyer for the district, J. William W. Harsch, responded to the complaint by saying that the small and mainly volunteer district βdoes its best to meet transparency and public records requestβ and noted that minutes are the responsibility of a part-time clerk who is an elected officer, not an employee, and who works full time as the executive assistant to Coventryβs town manager.
Harsch downplayed the severity of the infractions and said that while the meeting minutes are βimportant,β the complaint was a βprocedural/technical matter of missing required filing dates for draft minutes.
βThe district once again urges Mr. Novak to utilize his available avenues. . .to communicate his concerns directly to the district in the first instance, reserving any further requests for assistance of your office for any instance where he believes, in good faith, that the district is disregarding such concerns.β
The AGβs office ruled that the continued violations of the OMA after the June 2014 warning showed the failure of posting the minutes in a timely fashion was βwillful or knowing.β
The maximum penalty is $5,000.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.