California State Assembly Candidate Alleges Tech Giants Are Interfering With Campaign Website Access HB

While researching the upcoming primary elections, an unusual story caught my attention. A candidate running for State Assembly District 72 has accused both Google and Microsoft of tampering with the election by allegedly interfering with public access to their campaign website, Intelprocessors.com.

Subscribe

The choice of website name struck me as unconventional for a political campaign, but individuals and organizations often select domain names for their own reasons.

I first encountered this claim in an online post and decided to investigate further. When I typed intelprocessors.com into a browser’s search field, thousands of results appeared—but none led directly to the site itself. Entering “intelprocessors.com” into the browser’s address bar produced a search for Intel products and retailers rather than the campaign website. The browser didn’t display an error or warning; it simply ignored the typed address. I had never noticed such behavior before.

To test further, I tried multiple browsers and search engines. Older browsers tended to navigate directly to intelprocessors.com, while newer ones often returned only search results. For example, a friend using an older Apple phone with Yahoo as the default search engine accessed the site normally through Safari. However, another friend with a newer iPhone and a different default search engine received articles referencing anything but intelprocessors.com and could not reach the site directly.

Interestingly, some search engines displayed Patch.com articles mentioning the campaign website. When I opened one of those articles and clicked the embedded link, the site loaded correctly. That confirmed the website existed, though something seemed inconsistent in how browsers and search engines handled it.

It’s rare for a candidate to challenge major technology companies. According to publicly available data, Google controls roughly 90% of global internet traffic—an influence that could make or break a business or campaign.

The candidate’s website includes a statement from Frank Wagoner, who claims to have “helped 70 million people without them knowing.” The site does not elaborate on this assertion, leaving open questions about what he means and whether search engines might view him as a potential threat.

While I was drafting this article, Intelprocessors.com added new content referencing adult material on Facebook and a complaint reportedly filed with the Attorney General. Wagoner appears unafraid to confront large corporations, a stance unlikely to earn him sponsorships or financial support from them.

His website also declares that he will not accept donations. Few candidates adopt such a policy, and while it may reflect independence, it also limits exposure and advertising opportunities.

If this approach gains traction among future officeholders—pursuing public service without relying on others’ money—it could mark a refreshing shift in political culture.

California State Assembly District 72 includes addresses in the following cities: Seal Beach, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Laguna Beach, Aliso Viejo, Laguna Hills, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Westminster.

Note: The claims described above have not been independently verified. Readers are encouraged to consult official election sources and reputable news outlets for confirmation.