Politics & Government

Homeless Shelter In Laguna Niguel: Residents Speak Out

On Monday, a tiered temporary homeless shelter plan was put in motion across OC. Laguna Niguel Residents spoke out against the plan.

LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA — In Laguna Niguel, 22-acres of unused land near City Hall near the library — where children walk every day to go to school, where parents pick up children from daycare — is slated to serve as the site of a temporary homeless shelter. It is an area that is not flat or ready for tents, the Mayor says. However the Orange County Board of Supervisors has declared their intention to use that land to temporarily house the homeless in the ongoing debacle since the Santa Ana riverbed cleanup.

One day after an Orange County Superior Court Judge and County Supervisors agreed to temporarily house homeless at three locations across the county, the Mayor of Laguna Niguel spoke out against the idea that she read about in the news.

"The County staff did not even make a courtesy phone call to our city staff before announcing in the media that they issued a decree that an un-permitted homeless shelter should be erected in our city," Laguna Niguel's mayor Elaine Genneway said in a letter to the Supervisors. (Read the full letter below).

Find out what's happening in Laguna Niguel-Dana Pointfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Gennawey referred to the plan — which will split up the homeless that are currently in temporary motels to Huntington Beach, Irvine and then Laguna Niguel — as a "poorly thought out decision" that "does nothing to alleviate the problem of homelessness that has grown under the current Board of Supervisors' leadership."

She has called a special meeting of the City Council Tuesday night, immediately following our regular City Council meeting, to discuss potential litigation on this issue.

Find out what's happening in Laguna Niguel-Dana Pointfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Monday's decision to utilize funds that were originally earmarked to care for Orange County's mentally ill residents has sparked controversy countywide. Parents were also up in arms about the idea, including one mother who drops her children off at both the elementary school and the preschool in question.

"It is outrageous and egregious for the County of Orange to even consider a temporary homeless camp located in the City of Laguna Niguel," resident Kelly Tokarski told Patch.

The site where the temporary shelter is planned is a large open space, originally destined to be the new town center of Laguna Niguel, a plan that fell through in the fall of 2017. The space is between Crown Valley Parkway, Alicia Parkway and Pacific Island Drive. It is across the street from a Kindercare preschool, next to the library where kids come and go, and less than a block from Capistrano Unified School District's Moulton Elementary School.

Google Map Photo of Open Area in Laguna Niguel Suggested To House Homeless
"This land in the City of Laguna Niguel must be taken off the table immediately," Tokarski said. "Our our entire community is looking to the people that we put in office to ensure this property is no longer considered as a homeless shelter. It's about the safety of our children, our quality of life and our property values."
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VOTES TO RELOCATE HOMELESS POPULATION ACROSS
STREET FROM CHILDREN'S DAYCARE CENTER
I am outraged by the Orange County Board of Supervisors’ poorly thought out decision to move
the homeless tents out of the Santa Ana River Trail and move them to three different cities in
the county, Irvine, Huntington Beach and Laguna Niguel. This does nothing to alleviate the
problem of homelessness that has grown due to the Board of Supervisors’ willful abdication of
leadership. They have had years to address this issue and they are the ones who put
themselves in this "time crunch" with an apparent limitation of ill-advised options. It is unclear
how moving the homeless into temporary tents in an area that lacks public transportation, is not
pedestrian friendly, far from an employment center, and far from services will benefit the
homeless population in our county. This faulty logic is detrimental to both the residents of
Laguna Niguel who the County Supervisors purport to serve, and the homeless individuals they
have failed to help.

The Board of Supervisors has been searching for about 10 years to find a solution to the growing homeless population and provide needed services, but what have they done? First, they disbanded the Commission to End Homelessness, then they refused to spend the hundreds of millions in state funds that was designated to provide mental health services and supportive housing to the homeless (but were happy to collect the interest income of those funds), and now they want to spread the homeless population across the county which will make it even more difficult to provide them resources. As U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter put it, the county has been "chipmunking" the funds.

The Laguna Niguel site in question does not meet the criteria that the Board of Supervisors outlined. Unlike other existing and proposed locations, this is not an "isolated" location, and the placement of homeless tents will most definitely have a direct negative impact on the local community. The Laguna Niguel site borders a residential area, is directly across the street from a children's daycare center, shares the parking lot with the families and children going to the library, is in the middle of our Civic Center, and is literally right outside the front door of City Hall. The County staff did not even make a courtesy phone call to our city staff before announcing in the media that they issued a decree that an unpermitted homeless shelter should be erected in our city. County staff provided the Board of Supervisors a list of county-owned properties and they selected one property from each of the three service districts (North, Central, South) without consulting with anyone from the city!!

This move will not help those struggling to find shelter, food, and employment. In fact, this haphazard, hurried and poorly-planned action by the Board of Supervisors is gravely detrimental to public safety.

For the past couple of years, our city had worked with the county to develop this county-owned land into a new town center, which would have been an economic boon for both the county and our residents. A few months ago, the Board of Supervisors could not reach agreement with a developer for the property because they desired a higher financial return. What kind of a financial return will a temporary homeless shelter get the county? Zero! It is very short-sighted to use such valuable real estate, which could generate income for the county, to put up homeless tents, which drain public resources, not contribute to them. Additionally, the property in question does not have adequate public transportation, is not near a jobs center, and is far from county services. The land is not flat, so it is not tent-ready and there are mold and asbestos concerns in and around the County courthouse building. It would be much more logistically and financially responsible to provide the transitional housing needed at one larger site, as well as the wrap-around services that would lead to permanent supportive housing.

Supervisor Todd Spitzer stated at yesterday’s Board of Supervisors meeting that 571 beds are available, which is more than adequate since hundreds of homeless have either refused services or have not met with their assigned social worker.

To the residents of our great city-please rest assured that myself, the city council, and your city staff are taking immediate and appropriate action. As Mayor, I have called a Special Meeting of our City Council tonight, immediately following our Regular City Council meeting, to discuss potential litigation on this issue.

- Elaine Gennawey
Mayor, City of Laguna Niguel


Photo courtesy City of Laguna Niguel

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.