PETALUMA, CA — The Petaluma City Council is expected to reject every finding in a Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury report that accused city leaders of failing to oversee animal services, arguing the report misstates the law, misunderstands the city's council-manager form of government, and overlooks improvements already underway.
At its July 20 meeting, the council is scheduled to approve a formal response to the Grand Jury's May report, "Animal Services Revisited: A City Asleep at the Wheel," which criticized the city's oversight of former animal services contractor North Bay Animal Services (NBAS) and concluded the City Manager's Office allowed years of contract noncompliance, failed to enforce dangerous dog laws, and exercised authority beyond what the city charter allows.
The Grand Jury concluded inadequate oversight contributed to deteriorating animal care, financial instability at NBAS, failures to investigate dangerous dog incidents as required by city code, and a chaotic termination of the nonprofit's contract after reports of neglected animals at a Clearlake shelter. The report also argued the City Council delegated too much authority to the City Manager's Office, weakening accountability to voters.
Petaluma's proposed response sharply disputes those conclusions.
"The City wholly disagrees" appears repeatedly throughout the 20-page narrative response, with officials rejecting all eight findings and arguing the Grand Jury misunderstood municipal governance, overstated the city's legal responsibilities, and failed to recognize actions already taken to improve animal services.
City officials contend the council never relinquished its authority and that the city manager acted within powers granted by the city charter. The response says Petaluma exercised oversight through budgets, contracts, public meetings, and policy direction while staff handled day-to-day administration, a structure common among California council-manager governments.
The city also argues the Grand Jury issued its second report before reforms adopted in response to the previous year's investigation could be fully implemented and evaluated. Officials note the city had already hired an animal services consultant, invested in shelter improvements, begun planning for a new provider, and ultimately directed termination of the NBAS contract on March 2 after concluding the nonprofit could no longer meet contractual obligations.
Although the city disputes the report's conclusions, it says additional improvements are planned.
Petaluma will implement several recommendations through its upcoming animal services contract rather than through ordinance changes. Planned improvements include stronger performance reporting, complaint tracking, records management, bite incident documentation, contract oversight, and participation in regional discussions about a countywide animal services system.
The city declined to adopt several recommendations calling for new ordinances, mandatory independent hearing officer provisions, a specific pet licensing platform, and broader limits on city manager authority, arguing those proposals are either unnecessary or based on incorrect legal assumptions.
The Grand Jury had recommended the City Council establish clearer limits on city manager authority, strengthen reporting requirements, revise dangerous dog hearing procedures, improve records retention, create a formal citizen complaint system, modernize dog licensing, and continue pursuing a countywide governance model for animal services. It also urged the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors to help lead regional reforms.
The council will consider a resolution authorizing submission of its response to Sonoma County Superior Court as required under state law.
Additional items included on the agenda:
The Petaluma City Council regular meeting
Monday, July 20
Regular Session: 6 p.m.
Sign up for free local newsletters and alerts for the
Petaluma, CA Patch
Patch.com is the nationwide leader in hyperlocal news.
Visit Patch.com to find your town today.