This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

DID YOU KNOW That Macro Trends are Conspiring to Privatize Tide and Submerged Lands Around Us?

     In a controversial decision, Judge Gerald L. Buchwald of the San Mateo Superior Court ruled that the property on the San Mateo coast, Martin’s beach, was not subject to the California statewide public trust doctrine due to the fact that it’s historical ownership harked back to when it was part of Mexico.    Vinod Khosla, the billionaire venture capitalist best known for founding Sun Microsystems and making investments in ethanol, who recently bought the property was being sued by various parties that became indignant when Khosla instead of continuing the prior owners' practice of allowing and charging visitors simply closed access. 

   Controversial as this decision may be, the reality is that we should all be glad that the holes in the public trust doctrine are being brought to light.  As the California Supreme Court  noted: “The objective of the public trust is always evolving so that a trustee is not burdened by outmoded classifications favoring the original and traditional triad of commerce, navigation and fisheries over those uses encompassing changing public needs.” (National Audubon Society v. Superior Court supra page 434) Since that time other uses such as bathing, swimming, boating and general recreational purposes have been added to the mix.

     The fact is that instead of looking to the past for answers we need to be looking to the future.  In a time of rising seas and climate change, regulations and laws that were historically appropriate are today outmoded.  Historically title to lands under navigable waters up to the high water mark was held by the state in trust for the people.  However, the high water mark is an ambulatory border and is now on the move taking over what once upon a time where upland properties.  (www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/in-norfolk-evidence-of-climate-change-is-in-the-streets-at-h...) Imagine your home is located on the uplands in one of the above photos.  Do you think your home should still be yours if the tides come in?

   A couple of interesting factoids: today the planet has over 7 billion inhabitants with a projected increase to over 11 billion by 2100.  In addition our planet is over seventy percent covered by water.  Climate change and sea level rise are increasing the amount of land covered by water at an accelerating rate.   From the very beginning, human populations have tended to cluster right at the borders of land and water.

Find out what's happening in Redwood City-Woodsidefor free with the latest updates from Patch.

   The United States Federal government has a history of offering homesteads of federal land.  The earliest in 1862, the Homestead Act, granted adult heads of family who had not borne arms against the state 160 acres of land so long as they filed a nominal fee, resided on the land for at least five years and committed to improving the land.  There were several additional homestead acts and the program was only discontinued in 1976 with the exception of Alaska which discontinued the program in 1986.


     Maybe what we really need now is a Waterstead Act that grants tide and submerged lands to individuals that are willing to live on and improve tide and submerged lands.  What do you think?



The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?