Across Connecticut
Business

Drug Makers Conspired To Fix Prices: CT Attorney General

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong led 51 states and territories in filing a suit alleging price manipulation of generic drugs.

| Updated

CONNECTICUT, CT — The state Attorney General led a coalition of 51 states and territories Wednesday in filing the third lawsuit stemming from the ongoing antitrust investigation involving generic drug manufacturers.

The suit alleges the manufacturers engaged in a conspiracy to artificially inflate and manipulate prices, reduce competition, and unreasonably restrain trade for generic drugs sold across the United States.

Subscribe

This new complaint focuses on 80 topical generic drugs that account for billions of dollars of sales in the United States. The suit names 26 corporate defendants and 10 individual defendants. The lawsuit seeks damages, civil penalties, and actions by the court to restore competition to the generic drug market.

The topical drugs at the center of the complaint include creams, gels, lotions, ointments, shampoos, and solutions used to treat a variety of skin conditions and allergies.

"These generic drug manufacturers perpetrated a multibillion-dollar fraud on the American public so systemic that it has touched nearly every single consumer of topical products," Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a statement. "Through phone calls, text messages, emails, corporate conventions, and cozy dinner parties, generic pharmaceutical executives were in constant communication, colluding to fix prices and restrain competition as though it were a standard course of business."

According to a news release from Tong's office, the complaint stems from an ongoing investigation built on evidence from several cooperating witnesses, a document database of over 20 million documents, and a phone records database containing millions of call detail records and contact information for over 600 sales and pricing individuals in the generics industry.

"They knew what they were doing was wrong, and they took steps to evade accountability, using code words and warning each other to avoid email and detection," Tong said. "Our case is built on hard evidence from multiple cooperating witnesses, millions of records, and contemporaneous notes that paint an undeniable picture of the largest domestic corporate cartel in our nation’s history."

Among the records obtained by the states is a two-volume notebook containing the notes of one of the states' cooperators that memorialized his discussions during phone calls with competitors and internal company meetings over a period of several years.

Between 2007 and 2014, three generic drug manufacturers, Taro, Perrigo, and Fougera (now Sandoz) sold nearly two-thirds of all generic topical products dispensed in the United States, according to the news release.

"The multistate investigation has uncovered comprehensive, direct evidence of unlawful agreements to minimize competition and raise prices on dozens of topical products," Tong said. "The Complaint alleges longstanding agreements among manufacturers to ensure a 'fair share' of the market for each competitor, and to prevent 'price erosion' due to competition."

The suit is the third to be filed in an ongoing, expanding investigation that the A.G.'s Office has referred to as "possibly the largest domestic corporate cartel case in the history of the United States."

The first Complaint, still pending in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was filed in 2016 and now includes 18 corporate defendants, two individual defendants, and 15 generic drugs. Two former executives from Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Jeffery Glazer and Jason Malek, have entered into settlement agreements and are cooperating with the Attorneys General working group in that case. The second Complaint, also pending in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was filed in 2019 against Teva Pharmaceuticals and 19 of the nation’s largest generic drug manufacturers. The Complaint names 16 individual senior executive defendants. The States are currently preparing for trial on that complaint.

Corporate Defendants:

Individual Defendants:

Drugs listed in the complaint as subject to price-fixing and market allocation agreements:


See also: Teacher Who Assigned Slavery Homework Won’t Be Back

Social Media Personality Ripped Off After Moving To CT

Student Sues School; Amazon Opening New Facility: CT News

Man accused of killing wife/ Town holding 4th of July fireworks despite pandemic/ Police sergeant suspects co-workers of vandalism and more.>>>Read More.

More from Across Connecticut
News | 14h
News | 13h
News | 17h
See more on Patch >

Sign up for free local newsletters and alerts for the
Across Connecticut Patch

Patch.com is the nationwide leader in hyperlocal news.
Visit Patch.com to find your town today.

©2026 Patch Media. All Rights Reserved

Do Not Sell My Personal Information