Politics & Government

Presidential Hopeful Lindsey Graham Chides Connecticut Judges Over Death Penalty Ruling

Graham said that the decision that spares the lives of Cheshire killers Hayes and Komisarjevsky makes him "want to throw up."

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican presidential candidate, told national radio host Michael Medved that the Connecticut Supreme Court’s recent decision that the death penalty violates the state’s constitution makes him “want to throw up.”

All prisoners that had been on Connecticut’s death row have been spared the death penalty following last week’s ruling, in a 4-3 decision.

State lawmakers got rid of the death penalty in 2012 and had made it so that inmates already on death row would be executed but last week’s ruling spares the lives of those on death row.

Find out what's happening in Cheshirefor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The provision was added after the trials of Cheshire home invasion killers and rapists Steven Hayes and Joshua Komisarjevsky, according to the Hartford Courant. Both are on death row.

Hayes and Komisarjevsky were both convicted, in separate trials, with felony murder and sentenced to death for the 2007 killings of Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her children, Michaela, 11, and Hayley, 17.

Find out what's happening in Cheshirefor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Graham told Medved, via Buzzfeed, “It is such an outrage to me. I don’t know how the judges can live with themselves, but the law is the law. You know if I’m president of the United States, under my administration, my Attorney General - we’re going to prosecute people like this to the fullest extent of the law. I doubt if there’s any federal jurisdiction in a case like this, but it would be worth looking at.”

Read more at Buzzfeed.com here.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.