Politics & Government

Town Loses Appeal Of FAA Decision On Tweed Runway Expansion, But Mayor Says 'It's Far From Final Chaper'

Tweed's $165M terminal, runway expansion plan needs OKs from CT DEEP, Army Corps of Engineers, town's Inland Wetlands Commission and PZC.

In February 2024 East Haven filed an appeal on the December 2023 ruling by the Federal Aviation Administration giving the airport the green light for expansion. Nearly 2 1/2 years later, the court upheld FAA's OK.
In February 2024 East Haven filed an appeal on the December 2023 ruling by the Federal Aviation Administration giving the airport the green light for expansion. Nearly 2 1/2 years later, the court upheld FAA's OK. (Ellyn Santiago/Patch)

EAST HAVEN/NEW HAVEN, CT — In a statement sent to Patch, the Town of East Haven "acknowledged" Monday's decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit regarding the Federal Aviation Administration's approval of the proposed runway extension and terminal
improvements at Tweed New Haven Airport.

In February 2024, noting it is "deeply concerned about the environmental impact of the proposed Tweed Airport expansion," East Haven filed an appeal on the December 2023 ruling by the Federal Aviation Administration giving the airport the green light for the $165 million terminal and runway expansion project.

Submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the town requests a judicial review of the FAA's finding of "no significant impact" as a result of the project.

Find out what's happening in East Havenfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Read that story here.

The court denied the appeal and upheld the FAA decision Monday.

Find out what's happening in East Havenfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

"While the Court upheld the FAA's compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the decision represents only one step in the overall regulatory process," the statement reads. "The Town remains committed to ensuring that all remaining state and local permitting proceedings are conducted thoroughly, transparently, and in accordance with applicable law."

Mayor Joseph A Carfora weighed in on the decision and moving forward.

"From the beginning, our objective has been to ensure that East Haven residents have a voice throughout this process and that every aspect of the proposed project receives the careful
scrutiny it deserves," he said. "That commitment remains unchanged. We will continue to advocate vigorously for the protection of our neighborhoods, our natural resources, and the quality of life that our residents expect and deserve."

The town noted that though it didn't prevail in a federal appeals court, the "regulatory process governing the proposed
expansion is ongoing, and significant independent state and local reviews remain before the project may proceed."

The case hinged on whether the FAA complied with
the procedural requirements of the NEPA, but "leaves in
place the FAA's Finding of No Significant Impact."

The town said that the court's decision does not constitute final approval of the proposed airport expansion, there are myriad state and local reviews and permits that remain necessary before the project may proceed.

"Throughout this process, the Town of East Haven has consistently advocated for a comprehensive review of the proposed project's potential impacts on flooding and stormwater management, wetlands and coastal resources, traffic, public safety, noise, environmental mitigation, and the quality of life of its residents," Carfora said. "Those priorities remain unchanged and will continue to guide the Town's participation throughout the remaining regulatory process."

The project still needs regulatory reviews and state and local permits and approvals from the Department of Energy and Environment, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Office of State Traffic Administration, the East Haven Inland Wetlands Commission, and the East Haven Planning and Zoning Commission.

"Those agencies are not simply implementing the FAA's decision. They are each required to conduct an independent review based upon the evidence presented, the applicable law, and the standards governing their respective permits and approvals," said Carfora. "The Town of East Haven will continue to participate fully in each of those proceedings to ensure that the interests of our residents are represented and that appropriate environmental protections, meaningful mitigation measures, sound infrastructure planning, and public safety considerations are fully addressed wherever warranted."

Officials also noted that the town "expects that Save the Sound, along with other interested agencies, organizations, and members of the public, will continue to participate actively throughout the remaining regulatory and permitting process."

Town spokesperson Ed Sabatino said the town "welcomes a thorough and transparent review by all interested stakeholders as the project moves through the remaining state and local approvals."

"The Town of East Haven remains committed to participating actively and constructively in every remaining permitting process to ensure that all applicable laws are followed, meaningful mitigation measures are secured where appropriate, and the interests of East Haven residents remain at the forefront of every decision," Sabatino added.

"For decades, East Haven has worked to balance responsible regional transportation needs with the protection of its neighborhoods, natural resources, and quality of life," he said. "The Town remains committed to that mission and will continue to advocate professionally, transparently, and in accordance with the law throughout the remaining state and local review process."

Patch reached out to Tweed officials and the city of New Haven for comment. Check back for updates.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.