Schools
Pizza-Based Sex Class In Enfield Middle School Causes Outrage
Here is the complete text of the assignment, the teaching of which was said to be a mistake.

ENFIELD, CT — An assignment called "Pizza & Consent" which was given to eighth-grade Family Health and Human Sexuality students at John F. Kennedy Middle School has outraged some, despite assurances from Superintendent of Schools Chris Drezek that the distribution of the assignment "was a mistake" that was immediately reported to officials by the teacher involved.
A group of concerned, and in some cases angry, residents flooded Enfield's town hall during Tuesday night's Board of Education meeting to refute Drezek's claim, and to criticize an apology he made to the teacher, who he said has been the subject of physical threats and been called a pedophile.
Here is the complete text from the 2-page assignment obtained from Parents Defending Education, a national grassroots organization which, its website states, is "working to reclaim our schools from activists promoting harmful agendas."
Find out what's happening in Enfieldfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Consent is
Enthusiastic
It's a genuine "YES" and a strong want and desire from all involved.
Fluid
It's active and collaborative and can be given or taken away at any time.
Respectful
It's all about communicating, respecting boundaries, and constantly checking in.
Required
It's required before and during any sexual or sensual activity!
What's pizza got to do with it?
We can use pizza as a metaphor for sex! When you order pizza with your friends, everyone checks in about each other's preferences, right? Some people might be vegan, some might be gluten-free. Others might love pineapple, while others prefer pepperoni. Some might not like pizza at all. If you're a vegetarian, but your friend is a meat-lover, sharing a pizza is going to bring up a lot of issues. You don't know who you can share pizza with unless you ask!
The same goes with sex! You have to check in with your partner(s) and ask for their preferences. Your partner(s) might be comfortable with one sexual activity, but not another. Maybe your partner(s) only want to be touched a certain way, or maybe your partner(s) prefer to use certain language. Or maybe they don't like or want sex at all. You'll never know if your wants, desires, and boundaries are compatible with theirs unless you ask.
So start a conversation! It's the only way sex (and pizza) can be comfortable and enjoyable for everyone.
Personal Pizza
Now that you know this metaphor for sex, let's explore your preferences! Draw and color your favorite type of pizza. What's your favorite style of pizza? Your favorite toppings? What are your pizza no-nos? Now mirror these preferences in relation to sex! Here are some examples: Likes: Cheese = Kissing; Dislikes: Olives = Giving oral.
Obviously, you might not be able to list all of your wants, desires, and boundaries, but hopefully you'll start feeling more comfortable about discussing them. For those of ya'll who don't like pizza or sex at all, feel free to draw out another food favorite or include non-sexual activities.
On its website, Parents Defending Education said a parent received the following email from Brie Quartin, health and physical education coordinator for the Enfield Public Schools:
"The incorrect version, as opposed to the revised version of this assignment was mistakenly posted on our grade 8 curriculum page, and was inadvertently used for instruction to grade 8 Health classes. I caught the error after our curriculum revision in June, but failed to post the intended version. I own that, and apologize for the error. The correct version of the assignment is for students to work in small groups to craft a pizza with toppings (no behaviors associated with said toppings) that would make everyone happy/comfortable using non-verbal communication only. Students are then asked to reflect and discuss how thoughts or feelings can be confusing or miscontrued [sic], if we rely on non-verbal cues/communication alone. The parallel to be taught here is that when discussing pizza topping it is important that your preferences are clearly communicated to avoid any misunderstanding. This discussion then leads into how students can identify when consent it either present or not."
Sophia Arel read the "Pizza & Consent" document during the public communication portion of Tuesday's meeting, then added, "Does that make you feel uncomfortable? Does that make you cringe? Would you like to share your sexual preferences with a roomful of people? Imagine how a 13-year-old kid would feel. It's inappropriate. Keep this garbage out of our schools and let kids be kids."
Find out what's happening in Enfieldfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Arel then turned to Drezek and said, "And you made an apology to the teacher who 'made a mistake.' But what about an apology to the students who received the assignment? What about that? What a cowardly and weak response."
Just prior to public comments, a woman walked up to the speakers' table carrying several pizza boxes. She was escorted from the hall.
Tracy Jarvis, pastor of Enfield's New Day Church, made the most impassioned comments of all speakers, published here in their entirety.
"I know the board would choose to move from this pizza assignment at JFK, but the parents do not. I understand that it was stated that this assignment was accidentally given in its entirety and page 1 was the intentional assignment. My page 1 takeaways are, "I don't know who I can have sex with unless I ask," "I need to know my sexual partner's wants," "Do they want oral sex, where do they want to be touched, if they want to hear dirty words, do they want to do all things or just some things" and "I need to start being comfortable talking about sex for the purpose of fun." I'd like the board to tell us how this is teaching responsibility, self-control and social skills and decision-making, because that's what was spoken that this assignment was. This assignment is prompting kids to become sexually active before their time. You don't even know how to navigate platonic relationships well, so why introduce sexual relationships? 13-year-olds don't have sexual preferences; sexual preferences come with sexual maturity. So now we're to insist our kids come to the fullness of their sexuality at age 13? We should not be encouraging youth to explore each other's bodies with multiple partners in an open environment for any reason. If somebody is doing that or asking them to do that, they should be taught to tell a responsible adult, who then reports it. This assignment is normalizing and encouraging youth to be sexually promiscuous and deviant. I understand we need to teach kids boundaries, but you are giving them way more information than they are psychologically ready to handle at this age. By doing this, you open up doors for them to have partners who are older than them, increasing statutory situations. You open up doors for abusive family members and grown-ups in their lives. I understand there is a segment of society that have major traumatic sexual issues within their history. I too long to resource them. However, choosing to reform a child who was sodomized at age 11 that they can stand for themselves and choose to give oral instead is appalling. Are public schools now running programs for sexually abused children at the expense of the unviolated? Are we now hypersexualizing every youth because some are hurting? All youth need a safe haven from our overtly sexualized culture. I have poured 10 years of my life into building an environment where youth can be healthy and have healthy communities. We teach Enfield children self-respect, self-control and self-denial. I will continue to expand my energy to resource this community, and I ask that you do the same. Take a deeper look; are there more assignments that have the potential to corrupt the morals of our minors? It's really your job to know. This has gone too far, and we parents are not fed like they're intimidated to stand for what we believe in. We will fight for the purity and protection of our children."
Several other residents offered opposing viewpoints. Liz Davis denounced the proliferation of "conspiracy theories" being put forth on social media, even accusing several school board members of taking part.
"We've got the best teachers in this state; we've got the best superintendent in this state," she said. "I'm done with people disrespecting them, and I'm really done with elected officials that are behind this. Do what's right by all these kids, or step the hell down."
When reached by Patch Thursday, Drezek would not comment further on the matter.
The complete meeting may be viewed here.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.