Business & Tech
Ethics Violations Cited As 3 Removed From Columbia Association Board
Three members of the Columbia Association's board of directors have been removed. The board has cited ethics violations.
COLUMBIA, MD — Three board members of the Columbia Association were removed at the April 23 board of directors meeting due to ethics violations.
A statement released by the association Thursday stated that an ethics panel investigation had been launched and, effective that same day, Reg Avery, Karin Emery and Eric Greenberg were removed from the board.
"Their removal follows an ethics investigation report and recommendations made to the board of directors on April 9 and reviewed on April 14. In accordance with CA's bylaws and its process for considering alleged violations of the Code of Business Conduct & Policies, the CA board members, as the Columbia Council, met prior to the April 23 open meeting of the board of directors to take final action on the ethics panel recommendations," the board stated.
Find out what's happening in Columbiafor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The Columbia Association's ethics panel consists of three attorneys without any tie to or interest in the association.
“This board takes its obligations to Columbia Association and the Columbia community seriously, and that includes maintaining the integrity of our governance,” said Board Chair Collin Sullivan.
Find out what's happening in Columbiafor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The details of the ethics investigation, including the panel's findings and the basis for removal of members, were addressed in closed sessions.
During the April 23 meeting, remaining board members voted to release the findings. Removed members all endorsed the release of the findings, as well, the board of directors.
According to the report, in September 2025, the board of directors met in an executive session for a performance review of the chief executive officer. Board members submitted appraisal scores and feedback that was then compiled. That information was to remain confidential; however, a board member did not keep the information confidential, the report stated. Two members did not keep confidential "sensitive CEO appraisal data" that was submitted by board members.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.