Maryland Loses Revenue on Cyber Monday

As Marylanders join in the online shopping blitz that's become known as Cyber Monday, they should think about this: If they paid the sales tax they owe to the state for such purchases, Maryland would be $200 million richer.

The problem is, virtually no one pays, and the state's top tax enforcement officer doesn't believe they should.

Online buyers are supposed to pay sales taxes for their purchases by Jan. 21, 2013, one of the four deadlines a year for Maryland residents to file their "use tax."

This tax is imposed on any purchase that is not taxed by the seller, whether it be out of a catalog, from an Internet retailer or from a store in Delaware, which does not impose sales taxes.

If the goods purchased are being used in Maryland by a state resident and have not been taxed, that person is required to pay the 6 percent tax.

State Comptroller Peter Franchot said between consumers' lack of knowledge of this tax and an inability to enforce it, more than 95 percent of the Maryland public is breaking the law. However, the comptroller said he would not enforce it.

"I am not comfortable in enforcing that and will not," said Franchot, who said it is not the citizens' fault there is not a "sensible" compliance program for online sales tax. "The collection of sales tax is a responsibility of government and industry, not the consumer," he said.   

This use tax is almost impossible to enforce, Franchot said, and is costing the state around $200 million a year in tax revenue, with that number only increasing as e-commerce grows. The comptroller's office estimates that by 2020, the lost tax revenue will be more than $310 million.

Even if this lost tax revenue were collected, Franchot said it's unlikely that other tax increases, like the recent tax hike on those making $100,000 or more, would go away.

"Maryland has an insatiable appetite to raise taxes, so I would doubt that the Internet tax revenues would substitute for some other tax increase," said Franchot. "They'd just do both."

Dee Hodges, president of the Maryland Taxpayers Association, said her organization opposes the use tax, saying it is "more regulation of the Internet," and "a way of shutting down commerce."

If the tax replaced another tax in the state, Hodges said she would consider supporting it. Maryland already grossly overtaxes its residents, she said.

"Pretty soon they'll have a bill to tax oxygen," said Hodges.

Franchot said this problem is better solved by the U.S. government than the state, as it involves interstate commerce and companies outside Maryland's jurisdiction.

For many bricks-and-mortar retailers, the issue is one of equality. They say they can't fairly compete against online retailers that don't charge sales tax, while the state's physical retailers must.

Multiple bills in the House and Senate attempt to tackle this problem, including the Main Street Fairness Act, the Marketplace Equity Act and the Marketplace Fairness Act.

Maryland Retailers Association President Patrick Donoho said 6 percent may not sound like a lot, but the success of the state's summer, tax-free week underscores the fact that consumers do care.

Donoho cited the example of a jeweler who had a customer come in with a $10,000 ring purchased online. When the jeweler said it would cost $100 to resize, the customer was upset. Meanwhile, by purchasing the ring from an online retailer without a state location, the customer avoided paying the $600 in sales tax.

"I think what has happened is that technology and the market [have] so radically changed that our laws...have not kept up with them," said Donoho. "It has to get fixed because you can't pick winners and losers."

Franchot conceded that not enforcing the tax hurts Maryland businesses, but because he can't fix the problem, he won't be collecting the tax anytime soon.

"I have zero interest in making the overtaxed citizens of the state of Maryland guilty of some kind of felony for non-payment of a remote sales tax," he said.

This report was provided by Capital News Service.