Crime & Safety

Case Against Danvers Police Sent To Mediation

In a federal civil suit, Matthew Fairbanks claims Danvers police violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they arrested him in 2013.

DANVERS, MA — The U.S. District Court in Boston has sent a case filed against the town of Danvers, its police department and several of its officers to mediation. Matthew Fairbanks filed the lawsuit in 2016, claiming false arrest and a violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unlawful search and seizure. Earlier this month a judge had ruled in favor of Fairbanks by denying the town's motion for summary judgement on the illegal search and seizure claim by Fairbanks.

The order for mediation was filed in federal court Tuesday. The mediation is scheduled for late next month.

Danvers police responded to Fairbanks's father's apartment on Jan. 7, 2013 after a call of a domestic disturbance. Fairbanks, who was described as a decorated Marine suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, got into a fight with his father after the two had spent the night drinking, according to court documents.

Find out what's happening in Danversfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Fairbanks had reportedly slammed the older man's head off a bathroom fixture after getting into a fight with his father, who objected to his son "messing around" with an Applebee's waitress they had met earlier that night and had gone back to the apartment with the two men and the father's girlfriend. The older Fairbanks told police his son was married and his wife was pregnant at the time.

After police arrested Fairbanks, they searched the apartment and his car and found a Colt .45 pistol, a .38 caliber handgun, a rifle scope and sniper stand, a collapsible baton and a Marine-issued Ka-Bar knife. Fairbanks was charged with assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, two counts of improper storage of a firearm, and malicious destruction of property.

Find out what's happening in Danversfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

In the May 10 federal court ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton ruled that Danvers police should have known they needed a warrant to continue searching after conducting an initial, "protective sweep" of the apartment. There was also a discrepancy over whether the weapons were in plain sight that was not considered in a previous ruling by the court.

Dave Copeland can be reached at dave.copeland@patch.com or by calling 617-433-7851. Follow him on Twitter (@CopeWrites) and Facebook (/copewrites).

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.