It is refreshing to see that finally many anti-Casino people are finally coming out with the real motives why they are against the Casino. Tom Russ has always been unequivocal about his position. Tom does not like the Casino. GOOD FOR YOU TOM! I greatly respect your position and think that it is as valid as any. I am glad to see that many casino-opponents are finally following your lead and coming out with their real motives, be them religious, moral, philosophical, fear of the social implications of having a casino in town and other personal views and positions or even personal interests. I applaud you all and do respect your positions and see them as valid as just any other position. At last, we are not wasting our time with debates in which one side was not, for a single moment, open to any conversation, but only insisting that their motives were everything else other than what they really had in mind. Well, that "everything else" has been and is going to be addressed. It is on a signed document - THANK YOU VERY MUCH! Thank you for your support (I MEAN THIS!) in helping Milford negotiate for a very good agreement. Now, let's all talk. I find it to be so much more fun and so much more productive to have a debate about the issue now, specially with the casino opponents. We now know where each side is coming from. We can now say that we have two sides - the Proponents and the Opponents - debating this one real issue: WHAT'S A RESORT CASINO BRINGING TO MILFORD?
~~~~~~~~~~~
For more interesting and informative posts like this one, visit:
http://milford-ma.patch.com/blogs/joe-pontes-pro-casino-points
~~~~~~~~~~~
