Politics & Government

Selectman Kept Mum After Noticing Errors On Town Meeting Warrant

Wilmington Selectman Michael McCoy four articles should be removed from the warrant for the May 5 town meeting.

WILMINGTON, MA -- In one of his semi-regular missives to local news media, Wilmington Selectman Michael McCoy said he kept his "big fat mouth shut" in not one, but two selectmen's meetings after noticing errors that could invalidate four articles on the warrant for the May 5 town meeting. In a letter to the editor of Wilmington Patch and other news outlets, McCoy said he kept quiet so a deadline would pass, preventing the sponsors of those articles would not have time to correct the language and resubmit them to be considered this spring.

" No one caught the mistake. The Wilmington Board of Selectmen could, if they wanted to, accept those petition articles if they chose to after the February 2, 2018 deadline. So that was the last bite of the apple on February 26, 2018," mcCoy write in his letter, the complete text of which is published below.

It's no surprise that McCoy is the most vocal of two of those articles, which he claims would clear the way for a 760-unit condominium complex if it is approved by town meeting. Those articles were sponsored by Jacqueline Welch, wife of Michael Welch, who owns the Wilmington-based general contracting firm Quality Additions & Remodeling. McCoy claims Welch plans to build a condo complex on a 76-acre parcel off of Andover Street.

Find out what's happening in Wilmingtonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

McCoy claims the petitions for the four articles he takes exception to failed to indicate to signers that it was for inclusion on the annual town meeting warrant. In December, McCoy had to resubmit petitions when a warrant he was backing didn;t not make clear it was for the special town meeting warrant. That article, which adopted new zoning laws restricting where drug treatment facilities could be located in Wilmington, eventually made it to the warrant and was passed by special Town Meeting.

"So there is no difference here. In all of those four articles, it does not indicate what the people were signing. So town counsel has to apply the same rule of law as he did to me. They are illegal. Plain and simple," McCoy wrote. "The old saying-what's good for the goose is good for the gander or in this case, what's good for the retired pizza guy (me) should be good for the developer (Michael Welch) and the others. There should be no way that town counsel John Foskett can let this slide."

Find out what's happening in Wilmingtonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

As for now, the articles remain on the warrant. And McCoy still hasn't revealed the source for his claim that Welch is planning a massive condo complex. While McCoy noted in his first letter on the Welch warrant articles that he had backed smaller housing projects in the past, he has increasingly portrayed himself as the member of the five-member, elected board of selectmen who opposes the increase in housing in Wilmington in recent years. He has been the point person in opposing a controversial plan to build a drug treatment facility on Middlesex Avenue and in his letter he stressed "I am not anti development [sic], but I am for orderly development." In past public meetings, he has said he is worried that Wilmington is "starting to look like Chelsea or Everett" as a result of rapid development.

Complete text of Michael McCoy's letter to Wilmington Patch:

Dear editor,

On February 5, 2018 at the Wilmington Board of Selectmen meeting, the town manager Jeff Hull read into the record the memorandum dated February 2, 2018 which states 2018 Annual Town Meeting Warrant articles by Petition. The town manager, Jeffrey Hull started to read the eight warrant articles and as he read the first four, I recognized that they were all in legal form listing the petitioners name Adam J. Silva, Julianne Hooper, Michael J. Newhouse and Michael J. Newhouse again. All four petition articles are in legal form. All four started off stating Annual Town Meeting. Go get some popcorn folks--this is going to get interesting. The next four articles are all illegal. I'll explain in a second. As the town manager read the articles, the petitioners names are as follows: Sandra LaLiberte, Lyndsey Riley, Jacqueline Welch, and Jacqueline Welch again. (Jacqueline Welch is Michael Welch's wife, as in Michael Welch the developer). All four of those articles started off by stating "Petition Article", then the verbiage, however they missed out on some very important words on the top of each of the pages: Annual Town Meeting. That's right--NONE OF THEM stated Annual Town Meeting. Many of you well remember the fiasco I and the group Concerned Citizens of Wilmington went through just a couple of months ago this past December when I petitioned for a special town meeting where the Town Clerk, Sharon George, gave me the paperwork for my article and the header of each signature page were the words Annual Town Meeting. The group and I went out and collected 649 signatures whereas we only needed 200. When I returned the pages to the clerk's office figuring I was all set, because the clerk herself gave me the paperwork. Guess what? Just a few hours after turning in the papers, I got a phone call from Jeff Hull, the town manager, telling me that he had talked to the town counsel, John Foskett and stated to me that my article was illegal because I was lacking ONE word: It should have said SPECIAL Town Meeting, not Annual Town Meeting. So town counsel John Foskett deemed it illegal. This was not my fault. So what did we do? We did it again and collected even more signatures, 668 to be exact, because ONE WORD was missing. We know the history of that town meeting--we won.

So there is no difference here. In all of those four articles, it does not indicate what the people were signing. So town counsel has to apply the same rule of law as he did to me. They are illegal. Plain and simple. There should be no different opinion from my article deemed illegal to these four present articles.

Here is the best part; when I saw the articles as written on February 5, 2018 as the town manager Jeff Hull was reading them, I kept my big mouth shut knowing that the deadline to submit warrant articles by petitioners was February 2, 2018. However, at the next Wilmington Board of Selectmen meeting of February 26, 2018, the town manager Jeff Hull read the same exact articles again. Once again, I kept my big mouth shut and let the town manager do his thing and said nothing. No one caught the mistake. The Wilmington Board of Selectmen could, if they wanted to, accept those petition articles if they chose to after the February 2, 2018 deadline. So that was the last bite of the apple on February 26, 2018.

On Wednesday February 28, 2018, I spoke with the town manager Jeff Hull and confirmed with him my findings and he agreed that the time had, indeed, expired for petition articles to be submitted. Period. I told the manager that the four articles were all illegal, especially the one located on Andover Street--you guessed it--the Scirappa Farm article submitted by Jacqueline Welch. If passed at the town meeting, it would produce over 700 condos off Andover Street in Wilmington. I told the manager that as selectmen, I was instructing him as town manager to investigate this matter and give it to the town counsel. I told the town manager that I think nobody knows more than I do in regards to the omission of one word on a petition article. In this case, there were no words at all to state on any of the signature pages to indicate what the people were actually signing. The old saying-what's good for the goose is good for the gander or in this case, what's good for the retired pizza guy (me) should be good for the developer (Michael Welch) and the others. There should be no way that town counsel John Foskett can let this slide. The town counsel has no choice, like he did in my article, to deem these illegal. So what does that mean? All four of those articles must do it again, like myself and the Concerned Citizens of Wilmington and they have two options: Number one, wait till next year's annual town meeting OR 2. They must do what I did; get the correct verbiage and go back out there and collect 200 signatures for a special town meeting.

On a side note, I don't know how this got by the town relative to Scirappa's Farms. I was always under the impression that this was considered agricultural land and the Town of Wilmington should have the first right of refusal to buy the property. I remember back when then town manager, Michael Caira and the board of selectmen, which included myself, was in executive session to discuss this very topic and to the credit of the former town manager Michael Caira, he stated that he put the town into the positive position to buy the property when it became available. One more thing--those same four articles put together that are all illegal, it looks like the same font and format was used in all four articles, on all the signature pages, and they all head off with the words "Petition Article". Hmmm....very suspicious. I'm just one humble selectman calling it the way it is.

Sincerely,

Michael V. McCoy
Wilmington Selectman

Subscribe to Wilmington Patch for more local news and real-time alerts.

Patch file photo.

Dave Copeland can be reached at dave.copeland@patch.com or by calling 617-433-7851. Follow him on Twitter (@CopeWrites) and Facebook (/copewrites)

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.