Politics & Government
Sen. Smith Explains Why She'll Vote 'No' On MPLS Police Quesiton
Sen. Tina Smith — a Minneapolis resident — will vote "No" on the ballot question asking to dismantle the city's police department.

MINNEAPOLIS — U.S. Sen. Tina Smith last week announced that she will be voting "no" on Minneapolis ballot question No. 2, which asks residents if they want to dismantle the city's police department and replace it with a new "Department of Public Safety."
"After many conversations, I have concluded that Amendment #2 does not address the core public safety challenges we face, and may well move us in the wrong direction," Smith said.
"While there is much I agree with in the Amendment, one component poses an insurmountable problem - the requirement that the new Department of Public Safety report to both the Mayor and the City Council. My own experience working in City Hall tells me that this change will exacerbate what is a deeply flawed city governance structure, where accountability, authority and lines of responsibility between the Mayor and City Council are diffused and dysfunctional."
Find out what's happening in Southwest Minneapolisfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Read Smith's full statement below:
Like many of my Minneapolis neighbors, I have wrestled with how to vote. My core value is to find the right path toward the transformational change we need in public safety, so that everyone is safe in their home and communities. We know this promise has not been realized for many black and brown communities, which have been traumatized by an epidemic of violence and the long and painful history of racism, redlining, lack of investment, jobs and opportunity. These communities tell me they want more public safety, and they also want more justice in policing.
After many conversations, I have concluded that Amendment #2 does not address the core public safety challenges we face, and may well move us in the wrong direction.
While there is much I agree with in the Amendment, one component poses an insurmountable problem - the requirement that the new Department of Public Safety report to both the Mayor and the City Council. My own experience working in City Hall tells me that this change will exacerbate what is a deeply flawed city governance structure, where accountability, authority and lines of responsibility between the Mayor and City Council are diffused and dysfunctional. I believe imposing this dysfunctional structure for public safety would likely have a negative effect on public safety and the operations of the police department. This is why I’ll oppose Charter Amendment #2.
With the murder of George Floyd, Minneapolis became the epicenter of a global reckoning around racial justice and police brutality. People need to make up their own minds about the best way forward, and we must engage in deep discussion and action to transform policing and public safety. The status quo is unacceptable.
Smith joins Gov. Tim Walz and Rep. Angie Craig as Minnesota Democrats who oppose changing the city charter to remove the police department. The Star Tribune editorial board also said that removing the Minneapolis Police Department is a "recipe for chaos and infighting."
Find out what's happening in Southwest Minneapolisfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison have both endorsed the amendment
All Minneapolis voters will be faced asked to decide on the ballot question on Election Day, which is Nov. 2:
Shall the Minneapolis City Charter be amended to remove the Police Department and replace it with a Department of Public Safety that employs a comprehensive public health approach to the delivery of functions by the Department of Public Safety, with those specific functions to be determined by the Mayor and City Council by ordinance; which will not be subject to exclusive mayoral power over its establishment, maintenance, and command; and which could include licensed peace officers (police officers), if necessary, to fulfill its responsibilities for public safety, with the general nature of the amendments being briefly indicated in the explanatory note below, which is made a part of this ballot?
Yes
NoExplanatory Note: This amendment would create a Department of Public Safety combining public safety functions through a comprehensive public health approach to be determined by the Mayor and Council. The department would be led by a Commissioner nominated by the Mayor and appointed by the Council. The Police Department, and its chief, would be removed from the City Charter. The Public Safety Department could include police officers, but the minimum funding requirement would be eliminated."
The measure will pass with a simple majority.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.