For more than two decades, the goal of search engine optimization was relatively simple: get a website onto the first page of Google.
The logic was straightforward. Someone searched for a question, product, service or business, Google displayed a list of results, and websites competed to earn one of those positions. The higher a page ranked, the more opportunities it had to attract visitors.
That model is changing.
People still use Google every day, but they are increasingly turning to AI-powered tools such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Perplexity when they want an answer rather than a list of websites. Instead of presenting ten blue links and asking users to investigate each one, these platforms can synthesize information from multiple sources and provide an answer directly.
For businesses, publishers and organizations that depend on online visibility, that creates a new challenge.
A website can rank well for a traditional search query and still fail to appear when a potential customer asks an AI system the same question in a different way.
That doesn't mean traditional SEO is dead. Far from it. Google remains a major source of discovery, and the fundamentals of good search optimization continue to matter.
But the definition of online visibility is becoming broader.
The question is no longer simply, "How do I rank on Google?"
It is also becoming, "How do I make my information useful, understandable and trustworthy enough to be included when people ask AI systems for answers?"
Traditional search behavior often begins with a short phrase.
Someone might search for:
"best accounting software for small businesses"
An AI-oriented search might look more like:
"What accounting software is best for a small business with five employees, limited bookkeeping experience and a need for simple invoicing?"
The second query contains more context and often expects a synthesized recommendation rather than a list of pages.
That difference matters for content creators.
A page optimized only around a keyword may answer the first search adequately while failing to address the broader questions surrounding the topic. A genuinely useful resource, on the other hand, can explain the subject, answer common follow-up questions, provide evidence and help readers understand their options.
That kind of content has value regardless of where the reader discovers it.
The rise of AI search does not make traditional SEO irrelevant.
Google still rewards pages that satisfy search intent and provide a good experience. Businesses still need technically sound websites, useful content, relevant authority and trustworthy references.
Some of the most important fundamentals remain familiar:
The mistake is assuming that these fundamentals are enough by themselves.
They are the foundation. The next layer is making information easy for both humans and answer engines to interpret.
One of the biggest differences between conventional search and AI-generated answers is the way information is presented.
Google can return a page because it is relevant to a query and then allow the user to decide which result deserves attention.
An AI answer engine may instead combine information from several sources before producing a response.
That means the individual page is no longer always the final destination.
Its information may become part of a larger answer.
This creates a new question for publishers: if an AI system encounters your content, can it quickly understand what you are saying, determine which facts are important, and identify the source behind those claims?
Pages that make those tasks unnecessarily difficult may have less opportunity to be useful in answer-generation environments.
One of the simplest improvements businesses can make is to become more direct.
Many articles spend several paragraphs introducing a topic before answering the question the reader actually asked.
That may work for certain forms of storytelling, but informational content often benefits from a different approach.
If the question is "How long does it take to build a website?" the reader should not have to read 500 words before discovering the basic answer.
Give the answer early.
Then explain the factors behind it.
For example, a strong article might begin with a concise explanation of the typical timeframe and then discuss website complexity, content requirements, design, development, testing and revisions.
This structure helps human readers scan the page while also making the important information easier to identify.
The goal isn't to make every article artificially short. Long-form content can be extremely valuable.
The goal is to make long content easy to understand.
A useful article should have a logical information hierarchy.
Clear H2 and H3 headings help readers understand what comes next. Short paragraphs reduce visual friction. Lists can make complicated information easier to scan. Tables can be useful when readers need to compare clearly defined options.
The same principle applies to technical structure.
Relevant schema markup can help search engines understand certain types of information, although businesses should not treat schema as a shortcut to AI visibility. Structured data should accurately represent the content on the page rather than being added simply to manipulate search features.
The broader principle is simple: don't make important information harder to interpret than it needs to be.
Imagine a company has three different websites or profiles.
One says the business was founded in 2014.
Another says 2016.
A third lists a completely different headquarters location.
A human may notice the discrepancy. Automated systems can encounter the same problem when gathering information from multiple sources.
Businesses should therefore pay attention to consistency across their digital presence.
Important information can include:
This doesn't mean every website needs identical wording.
It means the underlying facts should not contradict one another.
The internet already contains millions of articles explaining the same basic subjects.
Simply publishing another generic article may not give readers a compelling reason to pay attention.
Businesses can make content more useful by adding something they actually know.
That might be original research, first-hand observations, customer questions, proprietary data, expert commentary, case studies or a detailed explanation of how a process works in a specific industry.
For example, a local accounting firm could publish a generic article about business taxes.
Or it could explain the most common bookkeeping problems it sees among small businesses in its service area, supported by anonymized observations and publicly available tax information.
The second approach gives the reader something more specific.
It also gives other publishers a reason to reference the resource.
Backlinks remain an important part of traditional SEO, but businesses should think beyond link counts.
A link from a relevant, respected publication can place a company in front of an audience while also providing a third-party reference to its work.
Mentions can matter for the broader online reputation of an organization as well.
However, businesses should avoid assuming that every mention automatically improves AI visibility.
AI platforms use proprietary systems, and their exact methods for selecting and weighting information can change.
There is no universal formula that guarantees a particular website will be cited.
The safer strategy is to build the type of digital footprint that would make sense for a trusted source in any environment: accurate information, useful resources, legitimate expertise and references from relevant third parties.
One of the biggest risks in the current AI-search conversation is turning a complicated subject into another checklist of ranking tricks.
There is no single universal "LLM score" that businesses can optimize against.
There isn't a magic word count that guarantees an AI citation.
There isn't a particular number of headings that automatically makes a page authoritative.
And adding schema to a weak article does not transform it into a trusted resource.
Businesses should be suspicious of anyone promising guaranteed placement in AI-generated answers.
Instead, focus on fundamentals that make information genuinely useful.
Answer questions clearly.
Support important claims.
Show expertise.
Keep facts accurate.
Make the page understandable.
Build a legitimate reputation outside your own website.
Those are durable strategies because they benefit readers regardless of which search technology becomes dominant.
If a business wants to build online authority, publishing everything on its own website is only part of the equation.
Third-party coverage can provide context that a company's own marketing materials cannot.
For example, a local business might be mentioned by a community publication, an industry association, a professional organization, a local chamber of commerce or a relevant trade publication.
The value isn't simply that another website contains the company's name.
The surrounding context matters.
A meaningful article that explains what the organization does, why it matters and where its expertise lies can provide substantially more value than dozens of irrelevant mentions.
This is why quality and relevance should generally matter more than chasing large quantities of links.
One practical way to adapt to AI-driven discovery is to stop thinking exclusively in terms of keywords.
Instead, identify the questions surrounding a topic.
Suppose a company sells project management software.
A keyword-focused content plan might target:
"project management software"
A broader question-based strategy could address:
These questions create a more comprehensive resource.
They also reflect the way people increasingly communicate with conversational search tools.
Another useful test is to imagine removing the marketing language from an article.
Would the information still be useful?
If the answer is no, the page probably needs more substance.
A strong business article should teach something before it asks the reader to buy something.
This is particularly important for content published on third-party websites. Readers generally respond better to useful information than to an advertisement disguised as an article.
A company can still be referenced naturally when it is relevant to the discussion. But the article should not depend on that mention to provide its value.
Google rankings remain worth monitoring, but they are no longer the only useful visibility metric.
Businesses can also watch for:
AI visibility can be harder to measure because answers may vary based on the wording of a prompt, user context, location, model and time.
That makes isolated tests unreliable.
A better approach is to monitor a consistent set of relevant questions over time and look for broader patterns.
Businesses don't necessarily need two completely separate SEO departments.
A more efficient approach is to build a unified content process.
Identify the questions, problems and decisions that matter to the people you want to reach.
Look at what currently ranks, what reputable publications have covered and where existing resources leave unanswered questions.
Answer the primary question directly, then cover the related issues that help the reader make a decision.
Use reliable sources for statistics, research and important factual claims. Distinguish clearly between established facts and opinions.
Use descriptive headings, concise explanations, relevant lists and appropriate structured data.
Make it clear who created the content and why that person or organization is qualified to discuss the subject.
If the content is genuinely useful, look for appropriate opportunities to have it referenced by relevant publications, organizations, and communities.
Outdated pricing, statistics, regulations, product information and other time-sensitive facts can quickly reduce the usefulness of an otherwise strong article.
Review traditional search performance alongside broader brand visibility and referral signals.
This workflow doesn't guarantee that an AI system will cite a particular page.
It does something more important: it creates content that deserves to be found and referenced.
The shift toward AI-assisted search also makes several old habits less attractive.
Publishing hundreds of nearly identical pages isn't a substitute for expertise.
Repeating a keyword dozens of times doesn't make an article more authoritative.
Adding vague claims such as "industry-leading" or "the world's best" doesn't establish credibility.
And generating large quantities of generic AI-written content without meaningful review can make a website less useful rather than more useful.
AI tools can help with research, outlining, editing and other parts of the content process. But the finished material still needs human judgment.
Someone needs to verify the facts, remove unsupported claims and add information that actually helps the reader.
There isn't a single tactic that guarantees success across Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and every future search platform.
The more sustainable answer is to build a content and authority strategy that works across environments.
For businesses trying to understand the best way to rank on Google and get cited by LLMs, the starting point should not be chasing a secret AI-ranking formula. It should be creating authoritative information that is easy to discover, easy to understand, properly supported and consistently represented across the web.
That means combining traditional SEO fundamentals with stronger editorial standards.
It means answering questions directly instead of burying the answer.
It means producing original insights instead of rewriting information that already exists everywhere.
It means earning relevant third-party references rather than treating link building as a numbers game.
And it means keeping important facts consistent wherever the organization appears online.
Google isn't going away simply because people are experimenting with AI search.
At the same time, businesses shouldn't assume that traditional rankings represent the entire future of online discovery.
The search experience is becoming more fragmented. People may discover a company through Google, an AI-generated answer, a news article, a social platform, a forum, a review site or a recommendation from another website.
That creates a larger opportunity for organizations willing to think beyond rankings.
The winners won't necessarily be the businesses that publish the most pages or chase every new optimization trick.
They will be the ones that consistently produce information worth finding, worth understanding and worth referencing.
For years, SEO was largely about getting someone to click a result.
The next phase is broader.
Businesses need to make sure their information can become part of the answer itself.
And that requires something that has always mattered in publishing, regardless of the technology involved: useful information, credible sources, clear communication and genuine authority.
Sign up for free local newsletters and alerts for the
New York City Patch
Patch.com is the nationwide leader in hyperlocal news.
Visit Patch.com to find your town today.