VIEWPOINT: 701 Pages of Evidence Are on the Record. Will Southampton Take a Real 'Hard Look'?
By Blaise F. Labriola
In a recent letter to The Southampton Press, Mayor Bill Manger assured our community of an open, robust, and transparent environmental review of the proposed downtown sewer system, inviting public engagement ahead of the Village Board's October 8 scoping hearing.
Approximately 50 Southampton Village homeowners have answered that invitation, submitting two bound reports totaling 701 pages of primary data, internal municipal files, and hydrogeological analysis into the official public record.
Southampton Town Clerk Sundy Schermeyer and Southampton Village Clerk Karen Bontempo have confirmed receipt, docketing the 701-page package for the October 8 hearing and transmitting it to Mayor Manger, the Village Trustees, and the Town Board.
Placing 701 pages on an administrative desk is merely step one. When citizens deliver scientific modeling and municipal files challenging the official narrative, government cannot simply check a procedural box, file the volumes away, and proceed with business as usual.
Residents attending the October 8 hearing deserve to know what these reports contain:
The 268-Page Environmental Dossier
Review the full document online
The first document, the Expanded Environmental Dossier, is an in-depth scientific, spatial, and topographical investigation of the proposed wastewater site at Lola Prentice Memorial Park (185 Windmill Lane).
Drawing on USGS bare-earth digital elevation models, soil surveys, and regional aquifer data, the report models the real-world dangers of injecting nearly 200,000 gallons per day of treated effluent into an area already plagued by a shallow water table. Concentrated subsurface recharge causes groundwater mounding, a physical rise in the local water table that spreads laterally. Directly downhill sits the sacred 1721 North End Burying Ground, the final resting place of American Revolutionary War patriots. Groundwater saturation threatens to destabilize 300-year-old headstones, accelerate foundation settlement, and flood burial shafts.
Crucially, the dossier disproves the claim that Lola Prentice Park is the "only" viable site. It profiles nine alternative locations across the Village, including developed municipal land, such as the 3.7-acre Department of Public Works campus at 100–104 Willow Street and transportation parking lots, that could host compact treatment facilities or split-site recharge without alienating public parkland or endangering a historic cemetery.
The 433-Page Evidence Matrix and FOIL Source Report
Review the full document online
The Evidence Matrix and FOIL Source Report reproduces 412 pages of primary internal municipal records, Board of Trustees minutes, engineering drafts, and email correspondence obtained through New York Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) requests.
The matrix itemizes 54 evidentiary findings where the Village's internal records conflict directly with its public presentations.
Among the revelations:
Clean Water, or Commercial Overdevelopment?
Beyond the immediate hazards at Windmill Lane, our community must confront an uncomfortable truth: Is this multi-million-dollar project purely about water quality, or is it an industrial infrastructure backbone designed to spur large-scale commercial densification?
A sewer system does not merely treat wastewater; its capacity shapes future density. Centralized sewer capacity can unlock multi-story upstairs apartments, expanded restaurant and bar seating, and commercial square footage that our historic streetscapes and local roadways were never built to accommodate. Sacrificing a quiet public park and threatening an ancestral cemetery to place industrial utility infrastructure in a residential neighborhood, all to fuel commercial expansion, is not environmental conservation.
Under SEQRA, the Village is legally required to study "induced growth" and the cumulative impacts on community character created by this capacity. What will Southampton Village look like once this spigot is opened?
The Legal Mandate for a Real "Hard Look"
The 701-page record dismantles the claim that sacrificing Lola Prentice Park is an inevitable necessity. It exposes that municipal leadership is spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars pursuing a legally obstructed, environmentally perilous site while viable, park-preserving alternatives remain unstudied.
Under New York's State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR Part 617), the Lead Agency is legally mandated to take a verified "hard look" at all substantive environmental concerns raised during public scoping. Officials cannot satisfy that duty with curated slide decks that gloss over primary records. Ignoring documented groundwater constraints, cultural resource risks, and prior municipal admissions does not make them disappear; it renders the Village's review vulnerable as arbitrary and capricious.
A Call for Genuine Dialogue
The 50 homeowners behind this submission are not opposed to clean water or restoring Lake Agawam. We recognize that downtown Southampton needs modern wastewater solutions. But "clean water" must not serve as rhetorical cover for unbridled commercial densification, the destruction of public parkland, or the desecration of our historic heritage.
We call upon Mayor Manger and the Village Board to publish both reports immediately on the Village's website and provide written, substantive answers to all 54 issues raised.
To our neighbors: Do not settle for curated presentations. If you would like a digital copy of the 268-page Environmental Dossier and the 433-page Evidence Matrix to help inform your own written comments before the October 22 scoping deadline, email me directly at blaise2475@gmail.com.
The public owns this data, and on October 8, the public will be heard.
Blaise F. Labriola is a Southampton Village resident writing on behalf of Village homeowners.
Sign up for free local newsletters and alerts for the
Southampton Patch
Patch.com is the nationwide leader in hyperlocal news.
Visit Patch.com to find your town today.