Health & Fitness
Coronavirus: SoCal Hospitals Lack Beds To Handle Likely Cases
Even in a "moderate" scenario, hospitals in Southern California would struggle to treat all patients, a new report from ProPublica found.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — Hospitals around Southern California will be overwhelmed with coronavirus patients in nearly all possible scenarios for infection rates, according to a ProPublica report using data from the Harvard Global Health Institute.
The report backs up the repeated calls by public health officials to "flatten the curve" — slowing the spread of the virus through social distancing in order to avoid a scenario where more Americans are infected by COVID-19 than can receive care at their local hospital.
But even under "moderate" infection levels, all of the Southern California cities and counties modeled by researchers would see an influx of patients far greater than their hospitals are currently equipped to handle, ProPublica found.
Find out what's happening in Banning-Beaumontfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The study looked at hospital capacity in referral regions — cities and counties — across the U.S., using data from 2018. In Southern California, it included Los Angeles, Orange County, Palm Springs, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura. Researchers considered different infection levels — 20%, 40%, or 60% of the population — and stretched them over six, 12 and 18-month timelines.
A "moderate" infection level would mean 40% of American adults contracting COVID-19 over 12 months, according to the Harvard team. By contrast, in a worst-case scenario, 60% of the population could be infected within just six months.
Find out what's happening in Banning-Beaumontfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Hospital capacities in each region
Even using researchers' "moderate" scenario, all of the Southern California regions modeled will need to expand their hospital capacities to accommodate likely surges in coronavirus patients. Each region's intensive care units, where severe COVID-19 cases are treated, will also be overwhelmed unless they are expanded, the researchers found.
Los Angeles would be overwhelmed in the "moderate" scenario, getting an influx of 647,000 patients and requiring 21,600 beds over one year. That's 3.3 times the region's current capacity.
In Orange County, hospitals would receive about 220,000 coronavirus patients in the moderate scenario, requiring 7,320 beds over one year — or 3.3 times the region's current capacity.
In the Palm Springs/Rancho Mirage area, hospitals would receive 26,800 patients needing 900 beds over one year in the moderate scenario, which is 2.2 times the region's current capacity.
The San Bernardino area would see an estimated 197,000 patients over a year in the moderate scenario, requiring 6,560 beds — 3.1 times its hospitals' current capacity.
The San Diego area would receive about 247,000 coronavirus patients over one year in the moderate scenario, needing 8,240 beds over one year, which is 4.2 times the region's current capacity.
Hospitals in the Ventura area would see 55,600 new coronavirus patients over one year in the moderate scenario, requiring 1,850 beds over that year. That's 6.7 times the region's current availability.
Even in researchers' best-case scenario, in which social distancing measures limit the infection rate to 20% of the population and spread the outbreak over 18 months, hospitals in Southern California and across the U.S. will still need to increase capacity in order to treat all those who get infected.
The state moved on Tuesday to do just that, as Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an emergency $500 million grant that will go, in part, toward adding new hospital beds. It was unclear how much the state's hospital capacity would be increased.
Don't miss the latest coronavirus updates from health and government officials in California. Sign up for Patch news alerts and newsletters for what you need to know daily.
Some regions are better-equipped than others, especially those in urban areas, which serve larger populations than rural hospitals.
"A serious epidemic in Grand Forks, North Dakota, will be much different than in Boston," Dr. David Blumenthal, president of the health care think tank The Commonwealth Fund, said in the ProPublica report.
In response to a request for comment from Patch, the state Department of Health referenced Gov. Gavin Newsom's remarks during a Sunday press conference, in which he said the state had 74,000 total hospital beds, with a surge capacity of 8,661. The state also has 7,587 ventilators, and expects to add another 900, Newsom said.
Across the country, hospitals have already started preparing for the influx of patients by canceling elective surgeries and trying to discharge patients sooner. But that may not be enough to get a handle on the pandemic unless hospitals also add more beds, according to the research.
ProPublica, a Patch Partner, is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power and other public concerns. Click here to see ProPublica’s full story and specifics about hospitals in your area.
Full coronavirus coverage:
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.
