Community Corner

County Of Santa Clara And Public Rights Project Lead Nationwide Coalition Opposing Trump Administration’s Assault On USPS

The USPS's changes undercut the ability of those on the front lines of government committed to serving their communities.

September 8, 2020

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIF. (September 8, 2020) — On Friday, the County of Santa Clara and Public Rights Project filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of a nationwide coalition of local and tribal governments opposing recent U.S. Postal Service (USPS) changes that have slowed critically important mail delivery. The brief, filed by 32 local and tribal governments, urges courts in Washington D.C. and Pennsylvania to block the USPS changes, which impede the ability of localities to administer the November election and provide other core governmental services in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Find out what's happening in Gilroyfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Starting in July 2020, U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy implemented a number of changes at USPS that have slowed down mail delivery and will make it harder for vulnerable communities, such as the elderly and communities of color, to vote by mail and receive essential government services. The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted these same communities, and due to the changes, now face even greater hurdles in exercising their right to vote and receiving often life-saving services such as mail-delivered prescriptions.

“As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, granting women the right to vote, during the most significant pandemic since that time, I am proud that the County of Santa Clara is leading this coalition of local and tribal governments to clearly demonstrate how the recent USPS policy changes would interfere with our efforts to ensure that everyone can safely vote,” said Cindy Chavez, President of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors.

Find out what's happening in Gilroyfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The amicus brief highlights how the USPS changes and resulting mail delays directly interfere with local and tribal government plans to administer the November election, including by delaying the delivery and receipt of ballots—posing a particular risk that ballots cast by members of the military overseas as well as elderly and disabled voters mailing their ballots will not be received in time to be counted. As a result, many local and tribal governments now must revamp election plans and find the funds—a mere two months before the election—to increase voting hours, secure additional polling locations, and/or add ballot drop boxes to ensure their constituents can safely and reliably exercise their right to vote.

“The Trump Administration’s attempt to sabotage the USPS is an unlawful assault on our democracy,” said Santa Clara County Counsel James R. Williams. “The County of Santa Clara will continue to make every effort to ensure that its constituents are able to exercise their fundamental right to vote in a safe and reliable manner.”

The brief also details the ways that many local governments rely on the mail to provide their residents essential social services, such as mailing prescriptions and providing rental assistance. Delays in receiving these services are particularly high stakes for vulnerable communities, given the health and economic crisis across the nation.

“As the brief makes clear, the USPS provides the backbone to so many crucial government services delivered by local and tribal governments,” said Public Rights Project’s Legal Director Jonathan Miller. “This isn’t just about the upcoming election. The USPS’s changes undercut the ability of those on the front lines of government committed to serving their communities. They delay needed medications, delivery of test results, and crucial notices. These politically motivated and totally unnecessary changes harm people’s lives.”

A diverse coalition of local and tribal jurisdictions joined the County of Santa Clara and Public Rights Project in filing the amicus brief. Signatories include: Columbus, OH; Philadelphia, PA; Cook County, IL; Alameda City, CA; Cincinnati, OH; Atlanta, GA; Dayton, OH; Austin, TX; East Palo Alto, CA; Berkeley, CA; Flint, MI; Boston, MA; Gary, IN; Cambridge, MA; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; Harris County, TX; Los Angeles County, CA; Pittsburgh, PA; Los Angeles City, CA; Portland, OR; Madison, WI; Saint Paul, MN; Marin County, CA; Santa Cruz, CA; Monterey County, CA; Seattle, WA; Oakland, CA; Somerville, MA; West Hollywood, CA; Yurok Tribe, CA.

The brief, which can be accessed at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/cco/overview/impact/Pages/ impact.aspx, was filed in support of motions for preliminary injunctions filed in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. v. DeJoy et al., No. 2-20-cv-04096 (E.D. Pa.) and State of New York, et al. v. Trump, et al., No. 1-20-cv-02340 (D.D.C.).

# # #

About the Santa Clara County Counsel’s Office

The Office of the County Counsel serves as legal counsel to the County of Santa Clara, its Board of Supervisors and elected officials, every County department and agency, and the County’s boards and commissions. With a staff of over 200, the Office is also responsible for all civil litigation involving the County and its officers. Through its Social Justice and Impact Litigation Section, the Office litigates high-impact cases, drafts innovative local ordinances, and develops policies and programs to advance social and economic justice.

About the County of Santa Clara, California

The County of Santa Clara government serves a diverse, multi-cultural population of 1.9 million residents in Santa Clara County, California, making it more populous than 14 states in the U.S. The County provides essential services to its residents, including public health protection, environmental stewardship, medical services through the County of Santa Clara Health System, child and adult protection services, homelessness prevention and solutions, roads, park services, libraries, emergency response to disasters, protection of minority communities and those under threat, access to a fair criminal justice system, and many other public benefits.

About the Public Rights Project

Public Rights Project is a national non-profit, based in Oakland, that builds state and local governments’ capacity to enforce their residents’ rights. Their mission is to close the gap between the promise of our laws and the lived reality of our most vulnerable communities. They work to achieve this mission by training attorney fellows to catalyze the proactive work of government law offices; providing strategic support in legal strategy, research, partnerships and data analytics to help offices develop high-impact legal cases; and designing and spreading community outreach and organizing approaches that empower community residents and advocates to be active partners in an enforcement agenda rooted in equity.

Media Contact: County of Santa Clara: María Leticia Gómez/Laurel Anderson, Office of Communications and Public Affairs, (408) 299-5119, sccpublicaffairs@ceo.sccgov.org; Public Rights Project: Madison Jacobs, 602-642-6471, madison@publicrightsproject.org

Posted: September 8, 2020

Amicus Brief D.D.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

________________________________________________

}

STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., }

}

Plaintiffs, }

}

v. } Case No. 20 Civ. 2340

}

DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as }

President of the United States, et al., }

}

Defendants. }

________________________________________________}

[PROPOSED] AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

THE CITY OF COLUMBUS, AND THIRTY LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS

Zach Klein, City Attorney

Richard N. Coglianese, City Solicitor General

77 South Front Street, 4th Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Jonathan B. Miller, Legal Director

LiJia Gong, Counsel

Sophia TonNu, Legal Fellow

Victoria Stilwell, Staff Attorney

PUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT

4096 Piedmont Avenue #149

Oakland, California 94611

Attorneys for the City of Columbus, Ohio

James R. Williams, County Counsel

Greta S. Hansen, Chief Assistant County Counsel

Tony LoPresti, Assistant County Counsel

Laura S. Trice, Lead Deputy County Counsel

Julia B. Spiegel, Deputy County Counsel

Mary E. Hanna-Weir, Deputy County Counsel

Zoé E. Friedland, Deputy County Counsel

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor

San José, California 95110-1770

Attorneys for the County of Santa Clara, California

Jessica M. Scheller

Chief; Advice, Business & Complex Litigation Division

Lauren E. Miller

Special Assistant State’s Attorney

Civil Actions Bureau –

Affirmative & Impact Litigation

Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office

500 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Attorneys for Cook County, Illinois

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 34

i

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES…………………………………………………………………….iii

STATEMENT OF INTEREST…………………………………………………………………. 1

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT………………………………………………………………… 3

ARGUMENT………………………………………………………………………………….... 4

I. USPS CHANGES HARM AMICI’S ABILITY TO ADMINISTER AND FACILITATE THE NOVEMBER 3, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION…………………………………………………………………………. 4

A. USPS Changes Impede Amici’s Ability to Reliably Send and Receive Critical Election Materials to Voters…………………………………………….5

1. USPS Changes Impede Delivery and Receipt of Vote-By-Mail, Absentee, Replacement, Emergency, Military, and Overseas Ballots…………………. 6

2. USPS Changes Impede Voter Registration and List Maintenance…………. 8

3. USPS Changes Impede Voter Outreach and Education Efforts …………… 9

4. USPS Changes Impede Outreach to Cure Ballot Deficiencies….………….. 10

B. USPS Changes Create Significant Administrative and Operational Burdens for Amici Administering Elections…………………………………………….... 11

1. Many Amici Must Seek to Expand In-Person Voting Options and Resources….………………………………………………………………... 12

2. Many Amici Will Need to Add Official Ballot Drop Boxes, More Frequently Empty Drop Boxes, and Increase Messaging Around Drop Box Availability…………………………………………………………….. 13

3. Amici Must Absorb Increased Mail and Other Costs……………………….. 15

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 2 of 34

ii

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

II. USPS CHANGES UNDERMINE OTHER CORE LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS……………………………………………………. 16

A. USPS Delays Interfere with Timely Payments to and from Amici and Increase Administrative Burdens…..…………………………………………… 16

B. USPS Delays Harm Amici’s Enforcement Efforts……………………………… 18

C. USPS Delays Undermine Critical Local Health Care Services.…………………20

III. A NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION IS REQUIRED TO REDRESS THE HARMS CAUSED BY THE USPS CHANGES ……………………………………………...23

CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………..25

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 3 of 34

iii

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Page

Cases

Pennsylvania v. Trump, 351 F. Supp. 3d 791, 830-35 (E.D. Pa.) .................................................................................... 24

Trump v. Int’l Refugee Assistance Project, 137 S. Ct. 2080, 2087 (2017) ................................................................................................... 23

Federal Statutes and Rules

52 U.S.C. § 20507 ........................................................................................................................... 9

52 U.S.C. § 21004(a)(3) ................................................................................................................ 10

Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(4)(E) ............................................................................................................. 1

State Statutes

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/1A-17 ........................................................................................................... 10

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2B-15 ........................................................................................................... 10

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2B-20 ........................................................................................................... 12

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/7-40(a) ......................................................................................................... 10

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(b)-(c) ................................................................................................... 11

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(g-5)...................................................................................................... 11

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/20-8.............................................................................................................. 12

Cal. Elec. Code §§ 2225(b), (c) ...................................................................................................... 9

Cal. Elec. Code § 3019 ................................................................................................................. 11

Cal. Elec. Code § 3020(b)(1), (d) ................................................................................................. 11

Cal. Elec. Code § 4005(a)(10)(I)(i) ............................................................................................... 10

Tex. Elec. Code § 18.061 ................................................................................................................ 9

Tex. Elec. Code § 86.006 .............................................................................................................. 15

Tex. Elec. Code § 87.0431(a), (b)(3) ............................................................................................ 11 Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 4 of 34

iv

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Local and Tribal Ordinances

Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code § 1101-63....................................................................................... 19

Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code § 1123-05....................................................................................... 20

Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code §§ 1101-57, 1101-61, 1101-81 ...................................................... 19

Emergency Yurok Tribe Election Ordinance §§ 4003, 4203, 4401, 4502 (Aug. 11, 2020) ......... 13

Other Authorities

Alex Ura, Texas’ Most Populous County Sending Mail-in Ballot Applications to Millions of Registered Voters, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 25, 2020) ............................................................................ 7

Alexa Ura, Texas Tells Harris County to Halt Plan to Send all Voters Applications for Mail-in Ballots, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 28, 2020) ..................................................... 7

Bethany Blankley, Candidates, Others Sue Secretary of State over Election Law Violations, Ctr. Square (Aug. 21, 2020) ...................................................................................................... 15

Bill Bush, Few Will Travel Far to Franklin County’s Single Early-Voting Site, Analysis Finds, Columbus Dispatch, Nov. 11, 2018 ............................................................................... 15

Catherine Candisky, Ohio Drug Overdose Deaths Back on Rise, Columbus Dispatch (July 21, 2020) .......................................................................................... 22

Cherokee County, Iowa, Military/Overseas Voting ........................................................................ 8

Columbus, Ohio, Access to Naloxone ........................................................................................... 23

Cook County Government, Cook County Health Patients Experience Major Delays in Mail Deliveries for Daily Medical Prescriptions (Aug. 24, 2020) ..................................... 21, 22

Erin Cox et al., Postal Service Warns 46 States Their Voters Could Be Disenfranchised by Delayed Mail-In Ballots, Wash. Post (Aug. 14, 2020) ............................................................... 7

Erin Spaht, VERIFY: No, the Post Office Did Not Triple the Cost States Pay to Mail Election Ballots, WUSA (Aug. 13, 2020) ............................................................................................... 16

Jacob Bogage, ‘Everyone’s Clueless’: Cost-Cutting Uncertainty Mires Postal Service In More Delays, Wash. Post (Aug. 29, 2020) ........................................................................................... 4

Jacob Pramuk, Fewer voters say they’re voting by mail amid uproar over USPS changes, CNBC/Change Research polls find, CNBC (Aug. 26, 2020) .................................................... 12

Jan Hoffman, Fearing a ‘Twindemic,’ Health Experts Push Urgently for Flu Shots, N.Y. Times (Aug. 16, 2020) ........................................................................................................ 2 Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 5 of 34

v

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Letter from Thomas J. Marshall, Gen. Couns., U.S. Postal Serv., to U.S. States (July 29, 2020) . 6

Lila Carpenter, Signature Match Laws Disproportionately Impact Voters Already on the Margins, ACLU (Nov. 2, 2018) ................................................................................................ 12

Mark Munro, As COVID-19 Resurges, So Does the Threat to Local Budgets, Brookings Inst. (June 2020) ...................................................................................................... 18

Nat’l Conf. of State Legislatures, Voting Outside the Polling Place, at tbl. 11 (2020 ............. 7, 11

Nat’l Inst. of Health, National institute on Drug Abuse: Opioid Summaries by State (2018)...... 22

Ohio Sec’y of State, The Use of Drop Boxes and Additional Instructions for Curbside Voting (Aug. 12, 2020) .................................................. 14

Press Release, Harris County Clerk, Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins Requests Governor Abbott to Extend Deadline to Receive Mailed Ballots After Election Day (Aug. 20, 2020) ....... 7

Samuel Stebbins & Grant Suneson, Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Missed Rent and Mortgage Payments Are Piling Up In Nearly Every State, USA Today (July 2020) ............................................................................................................ 18

Santa Clara County, Cal., Emergency Ballot Delivery Program, (2020) ....................................... 8

Tony Romm, Over 700 Cash-strapped Cities Halt Plans to Repair Roads, Water Systems, or Make Other Key Investments, Wash. Post (June 23, 2020), ...................................................... 18

U.S. Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, CDC COVID Data Tracker: Trends in Number of COVID-19 Cases in the US Reported to CDC, by State/Territory ........... 1

U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., Cincinnati City Health Department: Northside Health Center ........................................................................................................... 23

U.S. Dep’t of Just., Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, (Feb. 18, 2020)....... 8

U.S. Election Assistance Comm’n, Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2018 Comprehensive Report, at i, 98 (2018) ....................................................................................... 6

U.S. Postal Serv., 2020 Official Election Mail ............................................................................... 4

U.S. Postal Serv., State and Local Election Mail – User’s Guide, Pub. No. 632 (Jan. 2020) ...... 15

United Indian Health Servs, UIHS COVID-19 Response, Facebook (Apr. 2, 2020) .................... 21

United Indian Health Servs., Consortium Tribes .......................................................................... 21

Zach Gespart, Harris County OKs $17M to Add Polls, Voting Hours and Drive-Thru Balloting For November Election, Houston Chronicle (Aug. 25, 2020) .................................................. 13 Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 6 of 34

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

1

STATEMENT OF INTEREST

Amici, led by the County of Santa Clara and the City of Columbus,1 are local and tribal governments from across the county—representing communities large and small, rural and urban. Amici rely on the United States Postal Service (“USPS” or “Postal Service”) as the operational backbone of many essential government functions. Through the mail, amici administer elections, issue notices of violations of local ordinances, send pension checks, deliver medication, and provide diagnostic medical testing results—many of which are time-sensitive, time-bound, or otherwise require immediate attention.

Amici’s dependence on reliable Postal Service mail delivery has taken on even greater significance over the past six months due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic across the United States.2 With many government offices closed, in-person staffing significantly reduced, and residents encouraged to limit in-person contacts with people outside of their households, much of the business of government is conducted online, over the phone, and increasingly, through the mail. For some segments of the population, whether because of lack of familiarity with or access to the internet, the mail is the easiest way to apply for benefits, pay tickets and utility bills, or obtain additional services from their local or tribal government. The COVID-19-induced public health and economic crises have increased residents’ reliance on their local and tribal governments, including for the receipt of rental assistance and health care.

1 Amici declare that: (i) none of the parties nor their counsel prepared this brief in whole or in part; (ii) no party or party’s counsel contributed money that was intended to fund the preparation or submission of the brief; and (iii) no person or entity contributed money that was intended to fund the preparation or submission of the brief. Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(4)(E).

2 As of September 4, 2020, more than 6 million people have contracted COVID-19 and over 185,000 COVID-19-related deaths have been reported in the United States; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 43,249 new COVID-19 cases on September 1, 2020 alone. U.S. Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, CDC COVID Data Tracker: Trends in Number of COVID-19 Cases in the US Reported to CDC, by State/Territory, https://perma.cc/GDD7-TRJ6. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 7 of 34

2

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Amici also rely on the Postal Service to administer and facilitate federal, state, and local elections. Some amici run elections operations directly, setting up polling locations and counting mail-in or absentee ballots. Others facilitate local elections, are tasked with protecting public safety at polling locations, and engage their communities through registration drives, voter outreach, and other efforts to ensure that residents fulfill their civic duty to vote. All amici are more dependent on the efficient and reliable delivery of election-related mail this year due to public health concerns. Public health experts warn of a new surge of COVID-19 in the fall and winter, which may be aggravated by a severe flu season.3 To mitigate the health risks associated with contact outside of the home such as voting in person, some amici are mailing ballots to all eligible voters, while others are encouraging voters—especially those with health risks or who are living with vulnerable family members—to use mail-in options to cast their ballots. All amici have a vested interest in ensuring that elections are run effectively and fairly, protecting the fundamental rights of their constituents and fulfilling their statutory obligations to run and support elections while complying with public health orders and recommendations.

But now, a series of changes enacted by the recently appointed Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has undermined amici’s ability to use the mail. By slowing mail delivery and reducing the availability of mail services in certain areas, these changes hamper amici’s ability to execute their core governmental functions at a time when communities need services more than ever. Amici submit this brief to highlight the urgent harms that amici face.

3 Jan Hoffman, Fearing a ‘Twindemic,’ Health Experts Push Urgently for Flu Shots, N.Y. Times, (Aug. 16, 2020) https://perma.cc/ZUY3-V4TL. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 8 of 34

3

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

For amici—a broad group of local and tribal governments—reliable and efficient mail services are essential to the administration of core local government functions. That reliance is even more acute today because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The changes to Postal Service policies will irreparably harm amici’s ability to administer and facilitate the November General Election. Amici rely on the Postal Service at nearly every point in the election administration process—to maintain voter rolls, register voters, conduct voter outreach and education, provide ballots, and receive completed ballots. The uncertainty and delays caused by the USPS policy changes now jeopardize these critical functions. The changes have undermined public confidence in voting by mail at a time when public health risks weigh strongly against unnecessary contact outside of the home such as voting in person. The changes also have increased the administrative burdens on amici to rapidly set up additional ways for voters to exercise their constitutional right to vote.

Further, the changes interfere with amici’s other essential government functions such as collecting fees and taxes, sending pension payments, and enforcing local ordinances. Amici also depend on reliable Postal Service mail to provide critical health care services such as prescription refills, contact tracing, sexually-transmitted infection testing, and opioid overdose prevention. Without these services, patients are at risk for complications that could lead to emergency room visits and hospitalizations at a time when individuals are encouraged to stay home. In many instances, a delay of even a day can lead to irreparable harm—for amici, in fulfilling statutory obligations and ensuring efficient service delivery, and for their constituents, an elderly voter’s ballot may not be counted, a retiree may not be able to pay rent, or a patient may not receive life-

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 9 of 34

4

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

saving medication. For these reasons, amici urge this Court to grant Plaintiffs’ motion seeking preliminary relief.

ARGUMENT

I. USPS CHANGES HARM AMICI’S ABILITY TO ADMINISTER AND FACILITATE THE NOVEMBER 3, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION

Amici and their voting constituents rely on the Postal Service to conduct free and fair elections. Especially for the amici that are responsible for election administration, their reliance became even more pronounced in recent months as they planned for greater voting by mail in response to public health concerns surrounding in-person contact during the pandemic.4 However, those plans were thrown into question starting in early July 2020, when newly appointed Postmaster General Louis DeJoy instituted significant changes to USPS policies and operations. These changes included restricting operating hours and extra delivery trips, delaying mail processing and sorting, and changing election mail classifications and charges.5 The resulting degradation of USPS operations and mail delivery speed (1) impedes amici’s ability to reliably send and receive critical election materials to voters and (2) creates significant administrative and operational burdens for amici, which must now augment their non-mail voting options and related messaging less than two months before the General Election.

4 The Postal Service also anticipated increased vote by mail in the General Election. See, e.g., U.S. Postal Serv., 2020 Official Election Mail, https://perma.cc/6DXC-UZ96 (noting its creation of an official mail kit “in preparation for increasing Official Election Mail volume during the 2020 election season”).

5 On August 18, 2020, Postmaster DeJoy issued a statement “suspending” some of the changes, at least temporarily, but his statement did not reverse the confusion and harms already caused to USPS operations and amici. See, e.g., Jacob Bogage, (Aug. 29, 2020), ‘Everyone’s Clueless’: Cost-Cutting Uncertainty Mires Postal Service In More Delays, Wash. Post, https://perma.cc/8FMC-XDHQ. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 10 of 34

5

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

A. USPS Changes Impede Amici’s Ability to Reliably Send and Receive Critical Election Materials to Voters.

The changes to Postal Service operations and policies hinder amici’s ability to disseminate and receive core election information and materials, as required by federal and state law. Specifically, the USPS changes impede amici’s ability to: (1) send and receive requests for vote-by-mail, absentee, replacement, emergency, military, and overseas ballots; (2) regularly update and maintain voter registration rolls; (3) conduct voter outreach and education, including distribution of voter information guides; and (4) enable voters to timely address vote-by-mail ballot deficiencies.

These concerns about mail efficiency and reliability are not mere speculation. On August 6, 2020, for example, a candidate for office in Santa Clara County contacted the County’s Registrar of Voters to update the candidate’s statement of qualifications and inform the County that the candidate would send the requisite payment using USPS overnight guaranteed delivery. Six days later, the Postal Service sent the candidate a notice indicating it was unable to locate delivery information for the envelope carrying the check, which the County had not received. Not until August 14, 2020, long after the filing deadline, did the Postal Service locate and deliver the envelope. Had the candidate not acted swiftly to find an alternate payment method, due to the Postal Service delays, the candidate likely would have been unable to have the statement included in the county voter information guide, which is sent to all voters within the district.

The Postal Service has acknowledged this new reality. In letters to forty-six states and the District of Columbia, the Postal Service stated that its newly instituted operational delays will slow election-related mail, even indicating that some ballots requested close to state deadlines

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 11 of 34

6

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

are unlikely to arrive in time to be counted.6 As detailed below, similar delays now imperil amici’s election administration and facilitation plans a mere two months before the General Election.

1. USPS Changes Impede Delivery and Receipt of Vote-By-Mail, Absentee, Replacement, Emergency, Military, and Overseas Ballots.

The mail is a critical way by which voters receive and return their ballots. Whether a voter is using a vote-by-mail, absentee, replacement, or emergency ballot, or is a military or overseas voter, many citizens rely upon the mail to exercise their fundamental right to vote. More than a quarter of the 120 million Americans who cast ballots in the 2018 General Election did so by mail, and Postal Service mail was the most common method of ballot return.7 In Santa Clara County more than 950,000 voters received ballots in the mail in the March primary—and 87% of those who voted used mail-in ballots to cast their votes. In Chicago, Illinois, vote-by-mail is on the rise, jumping from around 4% of ballots cast in the 2000-2012 presidential elections to more than 20% in the March 2020 primary, with further increases expected in the 2020 General Election. In surrounding suburban Cook County, Illinois, the County Clerk’s Office already has received more than 176,800 vote-by-mail applications for the upcoming General Election—more than double the total number of mail ballots cast in the 2016 General Election. Harris County, Texas, experienced a more than 550% increase in vote-by-mail use between the 2016 and 2020 presidential primary run-offs and expects even larger numbers in the

6 See Letter from Thomas J. Marshall, Gen. Couns., U.S. Postal Serv., to U.S. States (July 29, 2020), https://perma.cc/E34C-7YXG.

7 U.S. Election Assistance Comm’n, Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2018 Comprehensive Report, at i, 98 (2018), https://perma.cc/8UGH-98UJ. Ballots may also be returned at polling locations and ballot drop boxes, depending on local and state regulations and policies. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 12 of 34

7

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

November General Election due, in part, to plans to mail ballot applications to all 2.4 million registered voters.8 And in Los Angeles County, all registered voters will receive vote-by-mail ballots, meaning that approximately 5.5 million votes could be cast by mail.

The efficient delivery of these ballots is critical for voters to receive, complete, and mail their ballots back to amici in time for their votes to be counted—as the Postal Service itself acknowledged.9 This is particularly true in the vast majority of states where ballots, postmarked on or before Election Day, must also be received by Election Day or shortly thereafter.10 It is also disproportionately true for elderly voters, who are more likely to vote by mail, particularly given their increased vulnerability to COVID-19. For example, in the March 2020 primary, Santa Clara County voters who were 65 and older used mail-in ballots 93.5% of the time, compared to around 70-80% for younger voters.

Mail delays are especially harmful to the emergency ballot delivery program in Santa Clara County and similar programs administered by other amici. The program is used by facilities that house voters who are hospitalized, incarcerated, or disabled and unable to retrieve their ballots themselves or to vote in person, allowing them to request a replacement vote-by-mail ballot. The program has particularly high uptake with senior living facilities, assisted living

8 Press Release, Harris County Clerk, Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins Requests Governor Abbott to Extend Deadline to Receive Mailed Ballots After Election Day (Aug. 20, 2020), https://perma.cc/Y58Z-MEW9; Alex Ura, Texas’ Most Populous County Sending Mail-in Ballot Applications to Millions of Registered Voters, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 25, 2020), https://perma.cc/8NSK-LZBX. Whether all 2.4 million applications for ballots ultimately will be sent to Harris County voters is being contested by the Texas Secretary of State. See Alexa Ura, Texas Tells Harris County to Halt Plan to Send all Voters Applications for Mail-in Ballots, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 28, 2020), https://perma.cc/HH8U-THUD.

9 See Erin Cox et al., Postal Service Warns 46 States Their Voters Could Be Disenfranchised by Delayed Mail-In Ballots, Wash. Post (Aug. 14, 2020), https://perma.cc/5CAW-YWR4.

10 See Nat’l Conf. of State Legislatures, Voting Outside the Polling Place, at tbl. 11 (2020), https://perma.cc/SJ9E-CLPW. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 13 of 34

8

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

centers, residential care facilities, and behavioral health care facilities. If a facility requests to participate in the program, the County’s Registrar of Voters allows voters to request a ballot to be mailed to them up until seven days before Election Day.11 But given the proximity of these requests to Election Day, mail delays of even one or two days could mean that ballots are not sent to voters or received by the County’s Registrar of Voters in time to be counted.

Uniformed and overseas voters are also acutely impacted. To receive a ballot, these voters must complete a request form, which is typically sent by Postal Service mail.12 In turn, amici must mail, fax, or email the ballot to the military or overseas voter. Once complete, most of these voters must return their ballots by mail, now risking that their ballots will not be received by amici in time to be counted.13 Moreover, some amici have strict time limits within which to mail military and overseas ballots, which increases this risk. In Los Angeles County, for example, the Registrar must mail these ballots between September 4 and September 19; as a result, delays in delivering or returning mailed ballots could result in disenfranchisement.

2. USPS Changes Impede Voter Registration and List Maintenance.

Efficient and reliable mail is critical for amici that directly administer elections. The mail is the primary method for voters to update their voter registration and for elections officials to

11 See, e.g., Santa Clara County, Cal., Emergency Ballot Delivery Program, at 3, 7 (2020), https://perma.cc/P6RG-5CU2. If the ballot is requested within six days of the election, the County will arrange for ballots to be hand-delivered to, or picked up by, the facility. But even then, the voters may be reliant on USPS to return their completed ballots.

12 See generally U.S. Dep’t of Just., Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, (Feb. 18, 2020), https://perma.cc/SF3F-5XAE.

13 See, e.g., Cherokee County, Iowa, Military/Overseas Voting, https://perma.cc/5K3U-ASBJ. Further, in Santa Clara County, even where these voters had the option of returning their ballots by fax, 80% of military and overseas voters in the March 2020 election elected to return their ballots by mail. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 14 of 34

9

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

confirm address changes and update their voter rolls, as required under federal and state law.14 For example, in Santa Clara County, in the last five months alone, almost 31,000 new voters registered to vote, more than 8,000 of whom completed their registrations by paper affidavit and returned them using Postal Service mail.

In addition, most residency confirmation required by federal and state law is conducted by sending out postcard mailers. When an elections official receives information indicating possible voter address changes, the official sends postcards by mail to the address at which the voter is registered.15 If the postcard is undeliverable, the voter will not receive a vote-by-mail ballot unless they contact the elections official—often by mail—to update or confirm their address. This process is critical to ensuring that voter registration rolls are up to date—i.e., that active voters receive their voting materials and that these materials are not erroneously sent to voters who have moved or are deceased, thereby reducing the likelihood of voter fraud. In Santa Clara County, at least a few hundred postcards have been marked as undeliverable. But due to the Postal Service delays, the County now may not receive those address corrections in time to send ballots to these voters and have them returned in time to be counted.

3. USPS Changes Impede Voter Outreach and Education Efforts.

Voter education and outreach is another critical aspect of amici’s election administration and facilitation efforts. It is also core to the mission of the elections departments for many amici. In many jurisdictions, significant outreach beyond the basic requirements of the Help America

14 See 52 U.S.C. § 20507; Tex. Elec. Code § 18.061 (requiring Texas to implement and maintain a statewide computerized voter registration list).

15 See, e.g., Cal. Elec. Code §§ 2225(b), (c). Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 15 of 34

10

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Vote Act is statutorily required.16 Moreover, amici must mail out voter information guides and other voter education material to ensure that voters have essential information in advance of the election—including how to change mailing addresses to receive vote-by-mail ballots. This outreach and messaging may need to be augmented and retooled to address concerns about voting by mail, requiring amici to make additional expenditures. In Santa Clara County, for example, because of uncertainty caused by the USPS changes, the Registrar of Voters altered its outreach messaging to further emphasize that vote-by-mail ballots can be dropped off at official ballot drop boxes and at polling locations as an alternative to returning ballots through the mail. And in response to voter concerns about the Postal Service, the City of Madison plans to have poll workers available in 206 city parks on Saturday, September 26, and on Saturday, October 3, 2020. Voters may drop off their absentee ballot with a poll worker, who will also be available to serve as a witness, if needed. The City estimates that this initiative will cost around $106,000.

4. USPS Changes Impede Outreach to Cure Ballot Deficiencies.

USPS delays and uncertainty also impede voter outreach by certain amici to cure ballot deficiencies, as permitted by state law. Nineteen states have a process for voters to correct errors on their mailed-in ballot, such as a missing signature or signature that does not match voter registration records. However, most of these states have extremely short timeframes for elections officials to notify voters of the error and for the voter to correct it, all of which is predominantly

16 52 U.S.C. § 21004(a)(3) (requiring state programs for voter education); see, e.g., Cal. Elec. Code § 4005(a)(10)(I)(i) (same); 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/1A-17 (requiring state departments and public institutes of higher learning to make voter registration information available); id. 5/7-40(a) (regulating ballot boxes, which allow voters to vote via drop box instead of in-person or by mail); id. 5/2B-15 (requiring Illinois election authorities, in light of COVID-19, to automatically send vote by mail applications to any person who voted by mail or in person in a 2018, 2019, or 2020 primary election, as well as to any person who registered to vote or changed their registration address between Illinois’ 2020 primary election and July 31, 2020). Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 16 of 34

11

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

done by Postal Service mail.17 For example, in California, when elections officials find a missing signature or mismatch between the signature on file and the signature on the ballot, they mail a statement to the voter explaining how the ballot error can be cured.18 The voter must send back the requisite information, arriving no later than two days before certification of the election, or return the form in-person by the deadline, for the ballot to be counted. Postal Service delays mean these voters may not have time to cure their ballots and have them counted, absent hand-delivering them during a pandemic.19 In previous elections, older voters, especially voters with disabilities, may have had their ballots disproportionately rejected due to signature mismatches and therefore may be more likely to need to use the signature cure process.20

B. USPS Changes Create Significant Administrative and Operational Burdens for Amici Administering Elections.

The USPS changes have rattled the public’s confidence in using the Postal Service for election-related services.21 As a result, more voters are likely to opt for in-person voting, despite

17 Nat’l Conf. of State Legislatures, supra note 10.

18 See Cal. Elec. Code § 3019 (requiring elections officials in California to provide notice to all voters with mismatching signatures on vote-by-mail ballots an opportunity to verify their signatures). In Santa Clara County, the County’s Registrar of Voters received around 1,500 of these signature verification forms by USPS mail in the March 2020 primary. See also 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(g-5) (requiring the election authority in Illinois to send notice by mail of the rejection of a vote-by-mail ballot and allowing up to fourteen days after the election for the voter to cure); Tex. Elec. Code § 87.0431(a), (b)(3) (requiring notice of signature mismatch, but no opportunity to cure).

19 This concern is heightened in California, where the state proactively extended statutory deadlines for receipt of ballots by mail, allowing them to be counted if postmarked on or before Election Day and received by seventeen days after Election Day. Cal. Elec. Code § 3020(b)(1), (d); see also 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(b)-(c) (requiring that mail-in votes postmarked no later than Election Day to be counted). However, the cure period was not also extended, which means that voters have an even shorter period of time to verify their signature. Compare id. 5/2B-20, with id. 5/20-8 (making no changes in period to cure signature mismatches).

20 Lila Carpenter, Signature Match Laws Disproportionately Impact Voters Already on the Margins, ACLU (Nov. 2, 2018), https://perma.cc/U7JG-4QUU.

21 See, e.g., Jacob Pramuk, Fewer Voters Say They’re Voting by Mail amid Uproar over USPS Changes, CNBC/Change Research Polls Find, CNBC (Aug. 26, 2020), https://perma.cc/TCJ3-WBYG (describing swing-state poll indicating significant drops in voters who plan to vote by mail). Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 17 of 34

12

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

the COVID-19 pandemic, or to seek out ballot boxes. Yet far more voters are receiving ballots by mail than in any prior election. As a result, amici will need to augment their plans for in-person voting, mail-in voting, ballot drop boxes, and other election services, imposing significant administrative and operational burdens only two months before the General Election.

1. Many Amici Must Seek to Expand In-Person Voting Options and Resources.

Due to the unreliability of USPS mail, amici must now seek to increase in-person voting opportunities to the extent practicable. These changes must be implemented only two months before the General Election and in accordance with state and local pandemic-related public health orders and recommendations. Yet many polling locations—many of which are senior centers and living facilities—are now declining to serve in that capacity due to COVID-19 concerns.22 At the same time, amici may be unable to increase poll-worker staff at existing polling locations while maintaining a six-foot distance between work stations, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Given these constraints, some jurisdictions are now making significant changes to increase voting hours and otherwise supplement capacity to ensure all voters can safely exercise their right to vote. For instance, after the Postal Service informed the state of Texas of potential delays, to account for the uncertainty of whether voters will vote in person or by mail, Harris County approved an additional $17 million outlay to both extend early voting hours to 10 p.m. on multiple nights, add one 24-hour voting period, and

22 For example, as of the end of August 2020, five senior centers or living facilities in Santa Clara County have declined to serve as polling locations due to COVID-19-related concerns. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 18 of 34

13

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

provide drive-through options, as well as to obtain new equipment to process an anticipated record number of ballots received by mail.23

However, for other local jurisdictions, increasing in-person voting capacity is not an option. For example, the Yurok Tribe, which is located in rural Del Norte and Humboldt counties in California, passed emergency legislation requiring the General Election to be conducted entirely by mail because of COVID-19 associated risks.24 As a result, tribal voters are entirely dependent on the mail to vote. In an area where access to the Postal Service is already extremely limited,25 these voters now have no choice but to be subject to USPS’s delays, increasing the likelihood that their ballots will not arrive or be returned in time to be counted. Ultimately, due to uncertainty caused by the USPS changes, many amici will have to prepare for both scenarios: increased voting at polling locations, and increased use of mail-in ballots and ballot boxes—even though budgets are tight and time to prepare is short.

2. Many Amici Will Need to Add Official Ballot Drop Boxes, More Frequently Empty Drop Boxes, and Increase Messaging Around Drop Box Availability.

Particularly where it is not possible to increase polling locations, amici, where possible, will need to increase the number of official drop boxes, drop box pick-ups, and messaging about drop box availability. In Santa Clara County, because of the USPS changes, the Registrar of Voters will need to add three additional routes to pick up drop box ballots. The County will also

23 Zach Gespart, Harris County OKs $17M to Add Polls, Voting Hours and Drive-Thru Balloting For November Election, Houston Chronicle (Aug. 25, 2020), https://perma.cc/XYK4-XNDE.

24 Emergency Yurok Tribe Election Ordinance §§ 4003, 4203, 4401, 4502 (Aug. 11, 2020).

25 In some Yurok tribal areas, mail cannot be delivered to households; rather, members depend on access to transportation to a local Post Office to pick up and send mail. The local Post Office has limited business hours and depends on a postal processing site in Eureka, California, leading to further mail delivery delays. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 19 of 34

14

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

need to place twenty-three additional boxes at locations that had high volume return in the March 2020 primary and to increase its public messaging to urge greater drop box use. The County and other amici must now seek to identify funds to provide these additional services at a time when local and tribal government budgets are facing enormous strains due to mounting COVID-related community needs that dwarf shrinking revenue.

Other amici are constrained from increasing drop box availability, putting additional pressure on amici to find other ways to expand voting opportunities. In Ohio, for example, the Secretary of State has issued a directive prohibiting any Board of Elections from using more than one drop box location per county.26 That means that any resident of the City of Columbus, for example, can drop off their ballot at only one location—the Franklin County Board of Elections office—even though that location may be a long distance to travel, in some cases more than 25 miles roundtrip, for many residents of Columbus and broader Franklin County.27 The same is true for the City of Cincinnati, where the only drop box is located outside of the City and is hard to access by public transit. In Harris County—and all counties in Texas—drop boxes are not permitted, though voters may deposit their ballots at the voting clerk’s office. For these jurisdictions, even in the face of a pandemic, in-person voting will be the primary option for casting a vote due to the uncertainty caused by the USPS changes for voting by mail—putting

26 Ohio Sec’y of State, The Use of Drop Boxes and Additional Instructions for Curbside Voting (Aug. 12, 2020), https://perma.cc/392P-MZGN (“Boards of elections are prohibited from installing a drop box at any other location other than the board of elections.”).

27 In 2018, due to state restrictions, Franklin County only operated one early polling location. Almost half of the County’s residents who voted in-person before Election Day lived within five miles of the polling location; those that lived further away used it “sparingly.” Bill Bush, Few Will Travel Far to Franklin County’s Single Early-Voting Site, Analysis Finds, Columbus Dispatch, Nov. 11, 2018, https://perma.cc/EG59-CW6A. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 20 of 34

15

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

even greater pressure on these jurisdictions to boost in-person voting capacity while adhering to public health orders and recommendations amid shrinking budgets.28

3. Amici Must Absorb Increased Mail and Other Costs.

The USPS’s longstanding practice has been to treat all election mail as First Class mail, which means election mail receives priority and is typically delivered between two and five days after mailing.29 Now, USPS has announced that election mail will instead be treated as standard mail, with delivery timeframes between three and ten days,30 and possibly more when mail volumes are unusually high such as during the winter holidays. As a result, amici may need to pay approximately 35 cents more per piece of election mail to ensure it is treated as First Class mail31—a significant cost and logistical change with little time to locate funds. Other costs include a likely uptick in counter services required to address voting questions at various Registrars of Voters and Boards of Election offices and otherwise deal with the upheaval caused by the USPS changes. Marin County has already noted an increased number of concerned calls to its Registrar of Voters about USPS changes.

Taken together, these changes undermine the reliability of election-related mail—and amici’s election administration plans—on the eve of a Presidential General Election that amici

28 See Tex. Elec. Code § 86.006. Harris County has piloted allowing these ballot drop boxes at eleven of the clerk’s office’s locations, making ballot delivery more accessible. Whether these ballot drops can occur during an extended early voting period is currently being litigated. See Bethany Blankley, Candidates, Others Sue Secretary of State over Election Law Violations, Ctr. Square (Aug. 21, 2020), https://perma.cc/T42Z-LE2N.

29 See U.S. Postal Serv., State and Local Election Mail – User’s Guide, Pub. No. 632 (Jan. 2020), https://perma.cc/TGE5-2NW5.

30 Id.

31 Erin Spaht, VERIFY: No, the Post Office Did Not Triple the Cost States Pay to Mail Election Ballots, WUSA (Aug. 13, 2020), https://perma.cc/Y2K7-6Z3C. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 21 of 34

16

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

must administer and facilitate during the worst pandemic in a century. Moreover, these changes come at a time when, as detailed below, USPS delays will impose significant non-election related costs on amici.

II. USPS CHANGES UNDERMINE OTHER CORE LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS.

Separate and apart from the harms to election administration, the USPS changes will hamper other core local and tribal government functions. Indeed, USPS delays will further stress local government services at a time when they already face unprecedented challenges due to COVID-19. These impacts include delays in payments, enforcement actions, and critical health care services.

A. USPS Delays Interfere with Timely Payments to and from Amici and Increase Administrative Burdens.

USPS delays will impede revenue streams that fund essential services for residents. Amici collect millions to billions of dollars in parking tickets, tax payments, and user fees, which support police and fire services, public schools, libraries, and park districts, among other things. Much of this revenue flows through the postal system—and is time-sensitive. Year-to-date, for example, the City of Chicago’s Department of Finance has received over $18 million in mailed parking tickets, red light camera violations, and speed camera violations; over $233 million via mailed tax payments; and $422 million in mailed payments related to its Aviation Department.32 And in 2019, Chicago received over $349 million via 403,813 mailed payments for its Utility Billing and Customer Services, which include water, sewer, and garbage fees and related taxes.

32 These payments include, for example, payments for Landing Fees, Terminal Area Use Charges, Rents, Concessions, and other Passenger Facility Charges and Customer Facility Charges. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 22 of 34

17

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Mail delays thus present a two-fold problem for local revenue streams. First, given that cities and counties collect up to billions of dollars through mail-in payments, even small delays can result in the loss of millions of dollars of earned interest income on savings or investments. These losses, in turn, directly impact amici’s bottom lines and budgets, which already are stretched thin during the pandemic and economic downturn. Second, mail delays create confusion for payees and additional operational burdens for local government employees. In Chicago, for example, an automated system electronically imposes late fees on parking ticket fines that are not paid within the allotted time. If a resident’s otherwise timely payment gets delayed or lost in the mail, Chicago must then track the original payment, manually remove the late fee, and communicate with the payee regarding the true amount owed. Given the volume of parking tickets processed daily, particularly in larger cities, these extra administrative burdens can add up to significant manpower and notice costs at a time when localities already are facing significant budget and staffing cuts.33

Relatedly, USPS delays pose a threat to residents who rely on the mail for certain local government payments. In Cincinnati, for example, many residents receive retirement service and pension payments from the City through the mail. A mail delay of just a few days—at a time when 24% of Ohioans either missed their most recent housing payment or are not confident that

33 See, e.g., Mark Munro, As COVID-19 Resurges, So Does the Threat to Local Budgets, Brookings Inst. (June 2020), https://perma.cc/T9GC-SHZP (reporting that in June 2020, states and localities across the country already had laid off 1.5 million government workers as a result of COVID-19 budget cuts); see also Tony Romm, Over 700 Cash-strapped Cities Halt Plans to Repair Roads, Water Systems, or Make Other Key Investments, Wash. Post (June 23, 2020), https://perma.cc/XS42-7BF5. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 23 of 34

18

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

they will be able to make their next one34—can make the difference between a missed or late payment and related fees. In the Yurok Tribe, fishermen confronted with depleted salmon stocks rely upon local governments to disburse disaster relief payments, sent through the mail, to make ends meet. Delays could be devastating for these fishermen. Similarly, the City of Chicago’s Department of Family and Support Services operates a Rental Assistance Program to help those who may face homelessness due to COVID-19. Within the past four months, Chicago received over 500 applications for this program through the mail. Even with a significant increase in funding for the program in response to the pandemic, the Department receives twice the number of applications than it can fund in a single month. Because the program has a finite budget that is inadequate to address local demand, and because applications often require back-and-forth to ensure all requirements have been met, mail delays could cause applicants to miss out on this program, or to not apply to other assistance programs for which they would be eligible if their rental assistance applications were denied. As a result, more Chicago residents could be at risk of becoming homeless.

B. USPS Delays Harm Amici’s Enforcement Efforts.

In addition to revenue collection, the USPS changes threaten to delay and undermine local enforcement efforts. Specifically, many local governments use the mail system to deliver code violation and fine notices. Timely delivery of these notices is thus crucial to correcting infractions as soon as possible and thereby protecting residents’ safety and well-being.

34 Samuel Stebbins & Grant Suneson, Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Missed Rent and Mortgage Payments Are Piling Up In Nearly Every State, USA Today (July 2020), https://perma.cc/DVA4-LQ7A. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 24 of 34

19

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

In Cincinnati, for example, the City relies on the mail system to enforce building standards and prevent mass foreclosures. Indeed, the Cincinnati Department of Buildings and Investigations—responsible for maintaining the health, safety, and welfare of Cincinnati residents in connection with residential and commercial buildings35—spends $41,000 on postage costs alone each year. Cincinnati uses this postage to send out critical notices concerning building demolitions and repairs that violate city code and face administrative proceedings.36 A delay in these notices may, as a result, perpetuate or create dangerous conditions for residents. Moreover, Cincinnati requires that within ten business days of filing a foreclosure action on residential property, banks register—through the mail—the vacant or foreclosed property with the city and maintain it until it is sold or reoccupied.37 Accurate and timely registrations are critical to Cincinnati’s efforts to track and combat the proliferation of abandoned properties and neighborhood blight, particularly in the present economic downturn.38

Code enforcement extends beyond building violations and, in fact, touches almost every aspect of residents’ everyday lives. In an average year, for example, the City of Chicago’s Department of Streets and Sanitation writes 40,000 to 50,000 tickets for violations, including overgrown weeds, overflowing garbage, and rat harborage—all of which are sent via USPS mail. Accordingly, even a few days’ delay in mail can create and exacerbate unsafe and unsanitary living conditions.

35 Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code § 1101-63.

36 Id. §§ 1101-57, 1101-61, 1101-81.

37 Id. § 1123-05.

38 See supra, note 33. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 25 of 34

20

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

More generally, amici rely upon the mail for basic registration and authorization functions. Chicago’s Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, for example, depends on the mail to send out business license applications, certificates, and account documents, including new licenses, cancellation forms, and license payments. Delays in this official correspondence can create significant confusion and backlogs in the licensing process, thus adding to the City’s administrative burdens and harming businesses forced to delay their operations while waiting on documents.

C. USPS Delays Undermine Critical Local Health Care Services.

USPS delays present a particularly acute problem for locally administered health care services, which many amici provide to millions of residents. Many of these local health care systems use the mail system to provide aspects of this care.

Cook County, Illinois, for example, operates one of the largest hospital systems in the nation. In this role, Cook County Health’s mail order pharmacy fulfills more than 20,000 prescriptions each month and relies on USPS to deliver prescriptions to patients.39 In July 2020, 23% of those prescriptions—more than 5,000 prescriptions—were delayed.40 In comparison, less than 1% of prescriptions faced delays in March of 2020.41 And already-vulnerable populations are disproportionately impacted by these delays. In certain zip codes within the Chicago area’s South Side neighborhoods, for example, as many of 50% of Cook County Health’s mail order

39 Cook County Government, Cook County Health Patients Experience Major Delays in Mail Deliveries for Daily Medical Prescriptions (Aug. 24, 2020), https://perma.cc/NBH3-HH43.

40 Id.

41 Id. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 26 of 34

21

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

prescriptions faced mail delays in July.42 Similarly, members of the Yurok Tribe—many of whom already face severely limited mail conditions—depend on mail order prescriptions delivered through the United Indian Health Services.43 The Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (“DHS”) has seen a marked increase in patients receiving their prescriptions by mail during the COVID-19 pandemic, jumping from about 15-16% prior to the pandemic to over 70-72% of patients during it. However, DHS reports that since the USPS policy changes, delivery times for prescriptions have shifted from three to five days to as long as three weeks.

These medication delays have life-threatening consequences, particularly when in-person options pose significant health risks during the pandemic. As the Chief Medical Officer at Cook County Health has explained, “[i]n many cases, these [delayed prescriptions] are life-saving medications that treat diabetes, hypertension and other chronic illnesses. Without these medications, patients are at risk for complications that could lead to emergency room visits and hospitalizations at a time when we are asking people to stay home.”44 Indeed, the Postal Service’s cost-cutting measures will exacerbate the spread of COVID-19 in more ways than one: local government health care providers not only rely upon mail-prescriptions to encourage patients to stay home, but also use the postal system for infectious disease contact tracing and quarantine notices for individuals without reliable internet or phone. A postal delay of just one

42 Id.

43 The Yurok Tribe is one of nine tribes that joined a consortium to operate the United Indian Health Services’ network of clinics. United Indian Health Servs., Consortium Tribes, https://perma.cc/KT53-35ZS. During the pandemic, the network has recommended that patients receive their prescriptions by mail to avoid in-person contact. United Indian Health Servs, UIHS COVID-19 Response, Facebook (Apr. 2, 2020), https://perma.cc/C3SM-GBW8.

44 Cook County Government, supra 39. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 27 of 34

22

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

day could, as a result, lead to innumerable infections if an unknowingly infected person goes to work or school while waiting for results, undermining efforts to control an outbreak.

Amici’s mail-related health care services extend beyond prescription programs and the mailing of COVID-19 notices and test results. The State of Ohio, for example, has the fourth highest rate of opioid-involved overdose deaths in the country,45 and Columbus and its surrounding suburbs have the highest number of overdose deaths—543 in 2019—in the state.46 To combat this crisis, Columbus mails free naloxone kits—used to prevent overdoses—through the mail to clinic providers and others.47 A delay in receiving these kits could directly result in preventable deaths. Relatedly, through the mail, the City of Cincinnati provides testing for sexually-transmitted diseases and screening for cancer and other chronic illnesses, such as diabetes.48 And because testing results are confidential, the City mails notices to vulnerable patients, including elderly or unsheltered community members, to request that they follow up with the Department of Health via phone or in person. In these instances, mail delays could worsen health outcomes not only for the recipients, but also for those with whom they may come into contact.

45 Nat’l Inst. of Health, National institute on Drug Abuse: Opioid Summaries by State (2018), https://perma.cc/EV5W-32WA.

46 Catherine Candisky, Ohio Drug Overdose Deaths Back on Rise, Columbus Dispatch (July 21, 2020), https://perma.cc/BP65-LQCU.

47 Columbus, Ohio, Access to Naloxone, https://perma.cc/9ZZ3-CVTU.

48 U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., Cincinnati City Health Department: Northside Health Center, https://perma.cc/A62G-BSEX. Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 28 of 34

23

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

III. A NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION IS REQUIRED TO REDRESS THE HARMS CAUSED BY THE USPS CHANGES.

The significant harms that amici and the plaintiff states and jurisdictions are experiencing due to the USPS changes are immediate and irreparable—and they will persist without nationwide relief.49

If only some states are granted relief, voters receiving ballots outside of those select states will continue to be adversely impacted by the USPS changes. For example, for overseas and military voters, and other voters who receive and mail their ballots outside of the jurisdictions that are granted relief, such relief will be incomplete.50 Santa Clara County, for example, has nearly 7,500 military and overseas voters and anticipates mailing more than an additional 11,000 ballots to voters who live in the County but requested that their ballots be mailed to an out-of-state address. The City of Madison has nearly 1,000 military and overseas voters and anticipates more than 2,500 total absentee ballots will be mailed outside of the county. Piecemeal relief will cause further confusion for voters and amici seeking to administer and facilitate elections, with little time to engage in outreach to clarify which voters will still be affected by USPS mail delays. Moreover, these mail delays cannot be redressed or otherwise mitigated through other voting avenues, as out-of-jurisdiction voters do not have the option of

49 Trump v. Int’l Refugee Assistance Project, 137 S. Ct. 2080, 2087 (2017) (per curiam) (“Crafting a preliminary injunction is an exercise of discretion and judgment, often dependent as much on the equities of a given case as the substance of the legal issues it presents.”).

50 See Pennsylvania v. Trump, 351 F. Supp. 3d 791, 830-35 (E.D. Pa.), aff'd sub nom. Pennsylvania v. President United States, 930 F.3d 543 (3d Cir. 2019), as amended (July 18, 2019), cert. granted sub nom. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 918, (2020), and cert. granted sub nom. Trump v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 918, (2020), and rev'd and remanded sub nom. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367 (2020 (exercising judgment and discretion in crafting a remedy that provides “complete relief to the plaintiffs”). Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 29 of 34

24

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

depositing a ballot in a local drop box or voting in person. Similarly, many local government operations conducted through the mail are not confined to geographical borders. As explained above, some of amici’s infectious disease contact tracing, which can save lives and limit the spread of COVID-19, relies upon mailing test results and quarantine notices to persons connected to local contacts regardless of the other person’s location.

As the Postal Service letters to nearly all states reveal, the USPS changes are nationwide in scope, and so, too, must be the remedy.

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 30 of 34

25

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, amici urge the Court to grant Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.

Respectfully submitted,

ZACK KLEIN

CITY ATTORNEY

Zach Klein, City Attorney

Richard N. Coglianese, City Solicitor General

77 South Front Street, 4th Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Jonathan B. Miller, Legal Director

LiJia Gong, Counsel

Sophia TonNu, Legal Fellow

Victoria Stilwell, Staff Attorney

PUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT

4096 Piedmont Avenue #149

Oakland, California 94611

Attorneys for the City of Columbus, Ohio

Jessica M. Scheller

Chief; Advice, Business & Complex Litigation Division

Lauren E. Miller

Special Assistant State’s Attorney

Civil Actions Bureau - Affirmative & Impact Litigation

Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office

500 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, IL 60602

Attorneys for Cook County, Illinois

JAMES R. WILLIAMS

COUNTY COUNSEL

/s/ Zoé E. Friedland

James R. Williams, County Counsel

Greta S. Hansen, Chief Assistant County Counsel

Tony LoPresti, Assistant County Counsel

Laura S. Trice, Lead Deputy County Counsel

Julia B. Spiegel, Deputy County Counsel

Mary E. Hanna-Weir, Deputy County Counsel

Zoé E. Friedland, Deputy County Counsel

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor

San José, California 95110-1770

Tel. (408) 497-5198

zoe.friedland@cco.sccgov.org

Attorneys for the County of Santa Clara, California

Dated: September 4, 2020

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 31 of 34

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL YIBIN SHEN City Attorney 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Room #280 Alameda, CA 94501 Attorney for the City of Alameda, California NINA HICKSON City Attorney 55 Trinity Avenue, Suite 5000 Atlanta, GA 30303 Attorney for the City of Atlanta, Georgia ANNE L. MORGAN City Attorney P.O. Box 1546 Austin, TX 78701-1546 Attorney for the City of Austin, Texas FARIMAH FAIZ BROWN City Attorney 2180 Milvia Street, 4th Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Attorney for the City of Berkeley, California EUGENE L. O'FLAHERTY Corporation Counsel City Hall, Room 615 Boston MA, 02201 Attorney for the City of Boston, Massachusetts NANCY E. GLOWA City Solicitor City of Cambridge 795 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Attorney for the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts MARK A. FLESSNER Corporation Counsel 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60602 Attorney for the City of Chicago, Illinois ANDREW W. GARTH Interim City Solicitor 801 Plum Street, Room 214 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Attorney for the City of Cincinnati, Ohio BARBARA J. DOSECK City Attorney 101 W. Third Street P.O. Box 22 Dayton, OH 45401 Attorney for the City of Dayton, Ohio RAFAEL E. ALVARADO JR. City Attorney 2415 University Ave. East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Attorney for the City of East Palo Alto, California ANGELA WHEELER City Attorney 1101 S. Saginaw Street Flint, MI 48502 Attorney for the City of Flint, Michigan RODNEY POL, JR. City Attorney 401 Broadway, Suite 101 Gary, IN 46402 Attorney for the City of Gary, Indiana VINCE RYAN Harris County Attorney 1019 Congress St., 15th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Attorney for Harris County, Texas RONALD C. LEWIS City Attorney 900 Bagby, 4th Floor Houston, TX 77002 Attorney for the City of Houston, Texas Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 32 of 34

MARY C. WICKHAM County Counsel 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attorney for the County of Los Angeles, California MICHAEL N. FEUER City Attorney 200 North Main Street, 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, California MICHAEL HAAS City Attorney 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Room 401 Madison, WI 53703 Attorney for the City of Madison, Wisconsin BRIAN E. WASHINGTON County Counsel 3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 275 San Rafael, CA 94903 Attorney for Marin County, California LESLIE J. GIRARD County Counsel 168 West Alisal Street, 3rd Floor Salinas, CA 93901 Counsel for the County of Monterey, California BARBARA J. PARKER City Attorney One Frank Ogawa Plaza Sixth Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Attorney for the City of Oakland, California MARCEL S. PRATT Philadelphia City Solicitor 1515 Arch Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania YVONNE S. HILTON City Solicitor City County Building 414 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Attorney for the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania TRACY REEVE City Attorney 1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 430 Portland, OR 97204 Attorney for the City of Portland, Oregon LYNDSEY M. OLSON City Attorney 400 City Hall and Courthouse 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Saint Paul, MN 55102 Attorney for the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota ANTHONY P. CONDOTTI City Attorney Atchinson, Barisone & Condotti P.O. Box 481 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 Attorney for the City of Santa Cruz, California PETER S. HOLMES Seattle City Attorney 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104-7097 Attorney for the City of Seattle, Washington

FRANCIS X. WRIGHT, JR. City Solicitor 93 Highland Avenue Somerville, MA 02143 Attorney for the City of Somerville, Massachusetts Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 33 of 34

MICHAEL JENKINS City Attorney Best Best & Krieger, LLP 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Ste 110 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Attorney for the City of West Hollywood, California MAGGIE POFFENBARGER Associate General Counsel 190 Klamath Blvd. Klamath, CA 95548 Attorney for the Yurok Tribe

Case 1:20-cv-02340-EGS Document 18-1 Filed 09/04/20 Page 34 of 34

Amicus Brief E.D.Pa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

________________________________________________

}

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., }

}

Plaintiffs, }

}

v. } No. 2:20-cv-4096

}

LOUIS DEJOY, in his official capacity as United States }

Postmaster General, et al., }

}

Defendants. }

________________________________________________}

[PROPOSED] AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

THE CITY OF COLUMBUS, AND THIRTY LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS

Marcel S. Pratt

Solicitor of the City of Philadelphia

Diana P. Cortes (PA ID No. 204274)

Chair, Litigation Group

Eleanor N. Ewing (PA ID No. 28226)

Chief Deputy City Solicitor

Benjamin H. Field (PA ID No. 204569)

Divisional Deputy City Solicitor

Sean McGrath (PA ID No. 322895)

Assistant City Solicitor

Michael W. Pfautz (PA ID No. 325323)

Assistant City Solicitor

Affirmative & Special Litigation

City of Philadelphia Law Department

1515 Arch Street, 15th Floor

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Attorneys for the City of Philadelphia

Jessica M. Scheller

Chief; Advice, Business & Complex Litigation Div.

Lauren E. Miller

Special Assistant State’s Attorney

Civil Actions Bureau - Affirmative & Impact Lit.

Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office

500 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Attorneys for Cook County, Illinois

James R. Williams, County Counsel

Greta S. Hansen, Chief Assistant County Counsel

Tony LoPresti, Assistant County Counsel

Laura S. Trice, Lead Deputy County Counsel

Julia B. Spiegel, Deputy County Counsel

Mary E. Hanna-Weir, Deputy County Counsel

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor

San José, California 95110-1770

Attorneys for the County of Santa Clara, California

Zach Klein, City Attorney

Richard N. Coglianese, City Solicitor General

77 South Front Street, 4th Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Jonathan B. Miller, Legal Director

LiJia Gong, Counsel

Sophia TonNu, Legal Fellow

Victoria Stilwell, Staff Attorney

PUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT

4096 Piedmont Avenue #149

Oakland, California 94611

Attorneys for the City of Columbus, Ohio

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 33

i

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES…………………………………………………………………….iii

STATEMENT OF INTEREST…………………………………………………………………. 1

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT………………………………………………………………… 3

ARGUMENT………………………………………………………………………………….... 4

I. USPS CHANGES HARM AMICI’S ABILITY TO ADMINISTER AND FACILITATE THE NOVEMBER 3, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION…………………………………………………………………………. 4

A. USPS Changes Impede Amici’s Ability to Reliably Send and Receive Critical Election Materials to Voters…………………………………………….5

1. USPS Changes Impede Delivery and Receipt of Vote-By-Mail, Absentee, Replacement, Emergency, Military, and Overseas Ballots…………………. 6

2. USPS Changes Impede Voter Registration and List Maintenance…………. 8

3. USPS Changes Impede Voter Outreach and Education Efforts …………… 9

4. USPS Changes Impede Outreach to Cure Ballot Deficiencies….………….. 10

B. USPS Changes Create Significant Administrative and Operational Burdens for Amici Administering Elections…………………………………………….... 11

1. Many Amici Must Seek to Expand In-Person Voting Options and Resources….………………………………………………………………... 12

2. Many Amici Will Need to Add Official Ballot Drop Boxes, More Frequently Empty Drop Boxes, and Increase Messaging Around Drop Box Availability…………………………………………………………….. 13

3. Amici Must Absorb Increased Mail and Other Costs……………………….. 15

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 2 of 33

ii

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

II. USPS CHANGES UNDERMINE OTHER CORE LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS……………………………………………………. 16

A. USPS Delays Interfere with Timely Payments to and from Amici and Increase Administrative Burdens…..…………………………………………… 16

B. USPS Delays Harm Amici’s Enforcement Efforts……………………………… 18

C. USPS Delays Undermine Critical Local Health Care Services.…………………20

CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………..23

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 3 of 33

iii

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Page

Federal Statutes and Rules

52 U.S.C. § 20507 ........................................................................................................................... 9

52 U.S.C. § 21004(a)(3) ................................................................................................................ 10

Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(4)(E) ............................................................................................................. 1

State Statutes

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/1A-17 ........................................................................................................... 10

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2B-15 ........................................................................................................... 10

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2B-20 ........................................................................................................... 12

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/7-40(a) ......................................................................................................... 10

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(b)-(c) ................................................................................................... 11

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(g-5)...................................................................................................... 11

10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/20-8.............................................................................................................. 12

Cal. Elec. Code §§ 2225(b), (c) ...................................................................................................... 9

Cal. Elec. Code § 3019 ................................................................................................................. 11

Cal. Elec. Code § 3020(b)(1), (d) ................................................................................................. 11

Cal. Elec. Code § 4005(a)(10)(I)(i) ............................................................................................... 10

Tex. Elec. Code § 18.061 ................................................................................................................ 9

Tex. Elec. Code § 86.006 .............................................................................................................. 15

Tex. Elec. Code § 87.0431(a), (b)(3) ............................................................................................ 11

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 4 of 33

iv

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Local and Tribal Ordinances

Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code § 1101-63....................................................................................... 19

Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code § 1123-05....................................................................................... 20

Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code §§ 1101-57, 1101-61, 1101-81 ...................................................... 19

Emergency Yurok Tribe Election Ordinance §§ 4003, 4203, 4401, 4502 (Aug. 11, 2020) ......... 13

Other Authorities

Alex Ura, Texas’ Most Populous County Sending Mail-in Ballot Applications to Millions of Registered Voters, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 25, 2020) ............................................................................ 7

Alexa Ura, Texas Tells Harris County to Halt Plan to Send all Voters Applications for Mail-in Ballots, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 28, 2020) ..................................................... 7

Bethany Blankley, Candidates, Others Sue Secretary of State over Election Law Violations, Ctr. Square (Aug. 21, 2020) ...................................................................................................... 15

Bill Bush, Few Will Travel Far to Franklin County’s Single Early-Voting Site, Analysis Finds, Columbus Dispatch, Nov. 11, 2018 ............................................................................... 15

Catherine Candisky, Ohio Drug Overdose Deaths Back on Rise, Columbus Dispatch (July 21, 2020) .......................................................................................... 22

Cherokee County, Iowa, Military/Overseas Voting ........................................................................ 8

Columbus, Ohio, Access to Naloxone ........................................................................................... 23

Cook County Government, Cook County Health Patients Experience Major Delays in Mail Deliveries for Daily Medical Prescriptions (Aug. 24, 2020) ..................................... 21, 22

Erin Cox et al., Postal Service Warns 46 States Their Voters Could Be Disenfranchised by Delayed Mail-In Ballots, Wash. Post (Aug. 14, 2020) ............................................................... 7

Erin Spaht, VERIFY: No, the Post Office Did Not Triple the Cost States Pay to Mail Election Ballots, WUSA (Aug. 13, 2020) ............................................................................................... 16

Jacob Bogage, ‘Everyone’s Clueless’: Cost-Cutting Uncertainty Mires Postal Service In More Delays, Wash. Post (Aug. 29, 2020) ........................................................................................... 4

Jacob Pramuk, Fewer Voters Say They’re Voting by Mail Amid Uproar over USPS Changes, CNBC/Change Research Polls Find, CNBC (Aug. 26, 2020) .................................................. 12 Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 5 of 33

v

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Jan Hoffman, Fearing a ‘Twindemic,’ Health Experts Push Urgently for Flu Shots, N.Y. Times (Aug. 16, 2020) ........................................................................................................ 2

Letter from Thomas J. Marshall, Gen. Couns., U.S. Postal Serv., to U.S. States (July 29, 2020) . 6

Lila Carpenter, Signature Match Laws Disproportionately Impact Voters Already on the Margins, ACLU (Nov. 2, 2018) ................................................................................................ 12

Mark Munro, As COVID-19 Resurges, So Does the Threat to Local Budgets, Brookings Inst. (June 2020) ...................................................................................................... 18

Nat’l Conf. of State Legislatures, Voting Outside the Polling Place, at tbl. 11 (2020 ............. 7, 11

Nat’l Inst. of Health, National institute on Drug Abuse: Opioid Summaries by State (2018)...... 22

Ohio Sec’y of State, The Use of Drop Boxes and Additional Instructions for Curbside Voting (Aug. 12, 2020) .................................................. 14

Press Release, Harris County Clerk, Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins Requests Governor Abbott to Extend Deadline to Receive Mailed Ballots After Election Day (Aug. 20, 2020) ....... 7

Samuel Stebbins & Grant Suneson, Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Missed Rent and Mortgage Payments Are Piling Up In Nearly Every State, USA Today (July 2020) ............................................................................................................ 18

Santa Clara County, Cal., Emergency Ballot Delivery Program, (2020) ....................................... 8

Tony Romm, Over 700 Cash-strapped Cities Halt Plans to Repair Roads, Water Systems, or Make Other Key Investments, Wash. Post (June 23, 2020), ...................................................... 18

U.S. Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, CDC COVID Data Tracker: Trends in Number of COVID-19 Cases in the US Reported to CDC, by State/Territory ........... 1

U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., Cincinnati City Health Department: Northside Health Center ........................................................................................................... 23

U.S. Dep’t of Just., Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, (Feb. 18, 2020)....... 8

U.S. Election Assistance Comm’n, Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2018 Comprehensive Report, at i, 98 (2018) ....................................................................................... 6

U.S. Postal Serv., 2020 Official Election Mail ............................................................................... 4

U.S. Postal Serv., State and Local Election Mail – User’s Guide, Pub. No. 632 (Jan. 2020) ...... 15

United Indian Health Servs, UIHS COVID-19 Response, Facebook (Apr. 2, 2020) .................... 21

United Indian Health Servs., Consortium Tribes .......................................................................... 21 Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 6 of 33

vi

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Zach Gespart, Harris County OKs $17M to Add Polls, Voting Hours and Drive-Thru Balloting For November Election, Houston Chronicle (Aug. 25, 2020) .................................................. 13 Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 7 of 33

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

1

STATEMENT OF INTEREST

Amici, led by the County of Santa Clara and the City of Columbus,1 are local and tribal governments from across the county—representing communities large and small, rural and urban. Amici rely on the United States Postal Service (“USPS” or “Postal Service”) as the operational backbone of many essential government functions. Through the mail, amici administer elections, issue notices of violations of local ordinances, send pension checks, deliver medication, and provide diagnostic medical testing results—many of which are time-sensitive, time-bound, or otherwise require immediate attention.

Amici’s dependence on reliable Postal Service mail delivery has taken on even greater significance over the past six months due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic across the United States.2 With many government offices closed, in-person staffing significantly reduced, and residents encouraged to limit in-person contacts with people outside of their households, much of the business of government is conducted online, over the phone, and increasingly, through the mail. For some segments of the population, whether because of lack of familiarity with or access to the internet, the mail is the easiest way to apply for benefits, pay tickets and utility bills, or obtain additional services from their local or tribal government. The COVID-19-induced public health and economic crises have increased residents’ reliance on their local and tribal governments, including for the receipt of rental assistance and health care.

1 Amici declare that: (i) none of the parties nor their counsel prepared this brief in whole or in part; (ii) no party or party’s counsel contributed money that was intended to fund the preparation or submission of the brief; and (iii) no person or entity contributed money that was intended to fund the preparation or submission of the brief. Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(4)(E).

2 As of September 4, 2020, more than 6 million people have contracted COVID-19 and over 185,000 COVID-19-related deaths have been reported in the United States; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 43,249 new COVID-19 cases on September 1, 2020 alone. U.S. Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, CDC COVID Data Tracker: Trends in Number of COVID-19 Cases in the US Reported to CDC, by State/Territory, https://perma.cc/GDD7-TRJ6. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 8 of 33

2

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Amici also rely on the Postal Service to administer and facilitate federal, state, and local elections. Some amici run elections operations directly, setting up polling locations and counting mail-in or absentee ballots. Others facilitate local elections, are tasked with protecting public safety at polling locations, and engage their communities through registration drives, voter outreach, and other efforts to ensure that residents fulfill their civic duty to vote. All amici are more dependent on the efficient and reliable delivery of election-related mail this year due to public health concerns. Public health experts warn of a new surge of COVID-19 in the fall and winter, which may be aggravated by a severe flu season.3 To mitigate the health risks associated with contact outside of the home such as voting in person, some amici are mailing ballots to all eligible voters, while others are encouraging voters—especially those with health risks or who are living with vulnerable family members—to use mail-in options to cast their ballots. All amici have a vested interest in ensuring that elections are run effectively and fairly, protecting the fundamental rights of their constituents and fulfilling their statutory obligations to run and support elections while complying with public health orders and recommendations.

But now, a series of changes enacted by the recently appointed Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has undermined amici’s ability to use the mail. By slowing mail delivery and reducing the availability of mail services in certain areas, these changes hamper amici’s ability to execute their core governmental functions at a time when communities need services more than ever. Amici submit this brief to highlight the urgent harms that amici face.

3 Jan Hoffman, Fearing a ‘Twindemic,’ Health Experts Push Urgently for Flu Shots, N.Y. Times, (Aug. 16, 2020) https://perma.cc/ZUY3-V4TL. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 9 of 33

3

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

For amici—a broad group of local and tribal governments—reliable and efficient mail services are essential to the administration of core local government functions. That reliance is even more acute today because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The changes to Postal Service policies will irreparably harm amici’s ability to administer and facilitate the November General Election. Amici rely on the Postal Service at nearly every point in the election administration process—to maintain voter rolls, register voters, conduct voter outreach and education, provide ballots, and receive completed ballots. The uncertainty and delays caused by the USPS policy changes now jeopardize these critical functions. The changes have undermined public confidence in voting by mail at a time when public health risks weigh strongly against unnecessary contact outside of the home such as voting in person. The changes also have increased the administrative burdens on amici to rapidly set up additional ways for voters to exercise their constitutional right to vote.

Further, the changes interfere with amici’s other essential government functions such as collecting fees and taxes, sending pension payments, and enforcing local ordinances. Amici also depend on reliable Postal Service mail to provide critical health care services such as prescription refills, contact tracing, sexually-transmitted infection testing, and opioid overdose prevention. Without these services, patients are at risk for complications that could lead to emergency room visits and hospitalizations at a time when individuals are encouraged to stay home. In many instances, a delay of even a day can lead to irreparable harm—for amici, in fulfilling statutory obligations and ensuring efficient service delivery, and for their constituents, an elderly voter’s ballot may not be counted, a retiree may not be able to pay rent, or a patient may not receive life-

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 10 of 33

4

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

saving medication. For these reasons, amici urge this Court to grant Plaintiffs’ motion seeking preliminary relief.

ARGUMENT

I. USPS CHANGES HARM AMICI’S ABILITY TO ADMINISTER AND FACILITATE THE NOVEMBER 3, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION

Amici and their voting constituents rely on the Postal Service to conduct free and fair elections. Especially for the amici that are responsible for election administration, their reliance became even more pronounced in recent months as they planned for greater voting by mail in response to public health concerns surrounding in-person contact during the pandemic.4 However, those plans were thrown into question starting in early July 2020, when newly appointed Postmaster General Louis DeJoy instituted significant changes to USPS policies and operations. These changes included restricting operating hours and extra delivery trips, delaying mail processing and sorting, and changing election mail classifications and charges.5 The resulting degradation of USPS operations and mail delivery speed (1) impedes amici’s ability to reliably send and receive critical election materials to voters and (2) creates significant administrative and operational burdens for amici, which must now augment their non-mail voting options and related messaging less than two months before the General Election.

4 The Postal Service also anticipated increased vote by mail in the General Election. See, e.g., U.S. Postal Serv., 2020 Official Election Mail, https://perma.cc/6DXC-UZ96 (noting its creation of an official mail kit “in preparation for increasing Official Election Mail volume during the 2020 election season”).

5 On August 18, 2020, Postmaster DeJoy issued a statement “suspending” some of the changes, at least temporarily, but his statement did not reverse the confusion and harms already caused to USPS operations and amici. See, e.g., Jacob Bogage, (Aug. 29, 2020), ‘Everyone’s Clueless’: Cost-Cutting Uncertainty Mires Postal Service In More Delays, Wash. Post, https://perma.cc/8FMC-XDHQ. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 11 of 33

5

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

A. USPS Changes Impede Amici’s Ability to Reliably Send and Receive Critical Election Materials to Voters.

The changes to Postal Service operations and policies hinder amici’s ability to disseminate and receive core election information and materials, as required by federal and state law. Specifically, the USPS changes impede amici’s ability to: (1) send and receive requests for vote-by-mail, absentee, replacement, emergency, military, and overseas ballots; (2) regularly update and maintain voter registration rolls; (3) conduct voter outreach and education, including distribution of voter information guides; and (4) enable voters to timely address vote-by-mail ballot deficiencies.

These concerns about mail efficiency and reliability are not mere speculation. On August 6, 2020, for example, a candidate for office in Santa Clara County contacted the County’s Registrar of Voters to update the candidate’s statement of qualifications and inform the County that the candidate would send the requisite payment using USPS overnight guaranteed delivery. Six days later, the Postal Service sent the candidate a notice indicating it was unable to locate delivery information for the envelope carrying the check, which the County had not received. Not until August 14, 2020, long after the filing deadline, did the Postal Service locate and deliver the envelope. Had the candidate not acted swiftly to find an alternate payment method, due to the Postal Service delays, the candidate likely would have been unable to have the statement included in the county voter information guide, which is sent to all voters within the district.

The Postal Service has acknowledged this new reality. In letters to forty-six states and the District of Columbia, the Postal Service stated that its newly instituted operational delays will slow election-related mail, even indicating that some ballots requested close to state deadlines

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 12 of 33

6

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

are unlikely to arrive in time to be counted.6 As detailed below, similar delays now imperil amici’s election administration and facilitation plans a mere two months before the General Election.

1. USPS Changes Impede Delivery and Receipt of Vote-By-Mail, Absentee, Replacement, Emergency, Military, and Overseas Ballots.

The mail is a critical way by which voters receive and return their ballots. Whether a voter is using a vote-by-mail, absentee, replacement, or emergency ballot, or is a military or overseas voter, many citizens rely upon the mail to exercise their fundamental right to vote. More than a quarter of the 120 million Americans who cast ballots in the 2018 General Election did so by mail, and Postal Service mail was the most common method of ballot return.7 In Santa Clara County more than 950,000 voters received ballots in the mail in the March primary—and 87% of those who voted used mail-in ballots to cast their votes. In Chicago, Illinois, vote-by-mail is on the rise, jumping from around 4% of ballots cast in the 2000-2012 presidential elections to more than 20% in the March 2020 primary, with further increases expected in the 2020 General Election. In surrounding suburban Cook County, Illinois, the County Clerk’s Office already has received more than 176,800 vote-by-mail applications for the upcoming General Election—more than double the total number of mail ballots cast in the 2016 General Election. Harris County, Texas, experienced a more than 550% increase in vote-by-mail use between the 2016 and 2020 presidential primary run-offs and expects even larger numbers in the

6 See Letter from Thomas J. Marshall, Gen. Couns., U.S. Postal Serv., to U.S. States (July 29, 2020), https://perma.cc/E34C-7YXG.

7 U.S. Election Assistance Comm’n, Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2018 Comprehensive Report, at i, 98 (2018), https://perma.cc/8UGH-98UJ. Ballots may also be returned at polling locations and ballot drop boxes, depending on local and state regulations and policies. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 13 of 33

7

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

November General Election due, in part, to plans to mail ballot applications to all 2.4 million registered voters.8 And in Los Angeles County, all registered voters will receive vote-by-mail ballots, meaning that approximately 5.5 million votes could be cast by mail.

The efficient delivery of these ballots is critical for voters to receive, complete, and mail their ballots back to amici in time for their votes to be counted—as the Postal Service itself acknowledged.9 This is particularly true in the vast majority of states where ballots, postmarked on or before Election Day, must also be received by Election Day or shortly thereafter.10 It is also disproportionately true for elderly voters, who are more likely to vote by mail, particularly given their increased vulnerability to COVID-19. For example, in the March 2020 primary, Santa Clara County voters who were 65 and older used mail-in ballots 93.5% of the time, compared to around 70-80% for younger voters.

Mail delays are especially harmful to the emergency ballot delivery program in Santa Clara County and similar programs administered by other amici. The program is used by facilities that house voters who are hospitalized, incarcerated, or disabled and unable to retrieve their ballots themselves or to vote in person, allowing them to request a replacement vote-by-mail ballot. The program has particularly high uptake with senior living facilities, assisted living

8 Press Release, Harris County Clerk, Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins Requests Governor Abbott to Extend Deadline to Receive Mailed Ballots After Election Day (Aug. 20, 2020), https://perma.cc/Y58Z-MEW9; Alex Ura, Texas’ Most Populous County Sending Mail-in Ballot Applications to Millions of Registered Voters, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 25, 2020), https://perma.cc/8NSK-LZBX. Whether all 2.4 million applications for ballots ultimately will be sent to Harris County voters is being contested by the Texas Secretary of State. See Alexa Ura, Texas Tells Harris County to Halt Plan to Send all Voters Applications for Mail-in Ballots, Tex. Trib. (Aug. 28, 2020), https://perma.cc/HH8U-THUD.

9 See Erin Cox et al., Postal Service Warns 46 States Their Voters Could Be Disenfranchised by Delayed Mail-In Ballots, Wash. Post (Aug. 14, 2020), https://perma.cc/5CAW-YWR4.

10 See Nat’l Conf. of State Legislatures, Voting Outside the Polling Place, at tbl. 11 (2020), https://perma.cc/SJ9E-CLPW. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 14 of 33

8

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

centers, residential care facilities, and behavioral health care facilities. If a facility requests to participate in the program, the County’s Registrar of Voters allows voters to request a ballot to be mailed to them up until seven days before Election Day.11 But given the proximity of these requests to Election Day, mail delays of even one or two days could mean that ballots are not sent to voters or received by the County’s Registrar of Voters in time to be counted.

Uniformed and overseas voters are also acutely impacted. To receive a ballot, these voters must complete a request form, which is typically sent by Postal Service mail.12 In turn, amici must mail, fax, or email the ballot to the military or overseas voter. Once complete, most of these voters must return their ballots by mail, now risking that their ballots will not be received by amici in time to be counted.13 Moreover, some amici have strict time limits within which to mail military and overseas ballots, which increases this risk. In Los Angeles County, for example, the Registrar must mail these ballots between September 4 and September 19; as a result, delays in delivering or returning mailed ballots could result in disenfranchisement.

2. USPS Changes Impede Voter Registration and List Maintenance.

Efficient and reliable mail is critical for amici that directly administer elections. The mail is the primary method for voters to update their voter registration and for elections officials to

11 See, e.g., Santa Clara County, Cal., Emergency Ballot Delivery Program, at 3, 7 (2020), https://perma.cc/P6RG-5CU2. If the ballot is requested within six days of the election, the County will arrange for ballots to be hand-delivered to, or picked up by, the facility. But even then, the voters may be reliant on USPS to return their completed ballots.

12 See generally U.S. Dep’t of Just., Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, (Feb. 18, 2020), https://perma.cc/SF3F-5XAE.

13 See, e.g., Cherokee County, Iowa, Military/Overseas Voting, https://perma.cc/5K3U-ASBJ. Further, in Santa Clara County, even where these voters had the option of returning their ballots by fax, 80% of military and overseas voters in the March 2020 election elected to return their ballots by mail. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 15 of 33

9

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

confirm address changes and update their voter rolls, as required under federal and state law.14 For example, in Santa Clara County, in the last five months alone, almost 31,000 new voters registered to vote, more than 8,000 of whom completed their registrations by paper affidavit and returned them using Postal Service mail.

In addition, most residency confirmation required by federal and state law is conducted by sending out postcard mailers. When an elections official receives information indicating possible voter address changes, the official sends postcards by mail to the address at which the voter is registered.15 If the postcard is undeliverable, the voter will not receive a vote-by-mail ballot unless they contact the elections official—often by mail—to update or confirm their address. This process is critical to ensuring that voter registration rolls are up to date—i.e., that active voters receive their voting materials and that these materials are not erroneously sent to voters who have moved or are deceased, thereby reducing the likelihood of voter fraud. In Santa Clara County, at least a few hundred postcards have been marked as undeliverable. But due to the Postal Service delays, the County now may not receive those address corrections in time to send ballots to these voters and have them returned in time to be counted.

3. USPS Changes Impede Voter Outreach and Education Efforts.

Voter education and outreach is another critical aspect of amici’s election administration and facilitation efforts. It is also core to the mission of the elections departments for many amici. In many jurisdictions, significant outreach beyond the basic requirements of the Help America

14 See 52 U.S.C. § 20507; 10 Ill. Stat. 5/1A-25 (requiring Illinois to create and maintain a centralized statewide voter registration list); Tex. Elec. Code § 18.061 (requiring Texas to implement and maintain a statewide computerized voter registration list).

15 See, e.g., Cal. Elec. Code §§ 2225(b), (c). Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 16 of 33

10

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Vote Act is statutorily required.16 Moreover, amici must mail out voter information guides and other voter education material to ensure that voters have essential information in advance of the election—including how to change mailing addresses to receive vote-by-mail ballots. This outreach and messaging may need to be augmented and retooled to address concerns about voting by mail, requiring amici to make additional expenditures. In Santa Clara County, for example, because of uncertainty caused by the USPS changes, the Registrar of Voters altered its outreach messaging to further emphasize that vote-by-mail ballots can be dropped off at official ballot drop boxes and at polling locations as an alternative to returning ballots through the mail. And in response to voter concerns about the Postal Service, the City of Madison plans to have poll workers available in 206 city parks on Saturday, September 26, and on Saturday, October 3, 2020. Voters may drop off their absentee ballot with a poll worker, who will also be available to serve as a witness, if needed. The City estimates that this initiative will cost around $106,000.

4. USPS Changes Impede Outreach to Cure Ballot Deficiencies.

USPS delays and uncertainty also impede voter outreach by certain amici to cure ballot deficiencies, as permitted by state law. Nineteen states have a process for voters to correct errors on their mailed-in ballot, such as a missing signature or signature that does not match voter registration records. However, most of these states have extremely short timeframes for elections officials to notify voters of the error and for the voter to correct it, all of which is predominantly

16 52 U.S.C. § 21004(a)(3) (requiring state programs for voter education); see, e.g., Cal. Elec. Code § 4005(a)(10)(I)(i) (same); 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/1A-17 (requiring state departments and public institutes of higher learning to make voter registration information available); id. 5/7-40(a) (regulating ballot boxes, which allow voters to vote via drop box instead of in-person or by mail); id. 5/2B-15 (requiring Illinois election authorities, in light of COVID-19, to automatically send vote by mail applications to any person who voted by mail or in person in a 2018, 2019, or 2020 primary election, as well as to any person who registered to vote or changed their registration address between Illinois’ 2020 primary election and July 31, 2020). Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 17 of 33

11

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

done by Postal Service mail.17 For example, in California, when elections officials find a missing signature or mismatch between the signature on file and the signature on the ballot, they mail a statement to the voter explaining how the ballot error can be cured.18 The voter must send back the requisite information, arriving no later than two days before certification of the election, or return the form in-person by the deadline, for the ballot to be counted. Postal Service delays mean these voters may not have time to cure their ballots and have them counted, absent hand-delivering them during a pandemic.19 In previous elections, older voters, especially voters with disabilities, may have had their ballots disproportionately rejected due to signature mismatches and therefore may be more likely to need to use the signature cure process.20

B. USPS Changes Create Significant Administrative and Operational Burdens for Amici Administering Elections.

The USPS changes have rattled the public’s confidence in using the Postal Service for election-related services.21 As a result, more voters are likely to opt for in-person voting, despite

17 Nat’l Conf. of State Legislatures, supra note 10.

18 See Cal. Elec. Code § 3019 (requiring elections officials in California to provide notice to all voters with mismatching signatures on vote-by-mail ballots an opportunity to verify their signatures). In Santa Clara County, the County’s Registrar of Voters received around 1,500 of these signature verification forms by USPS mail in the March 2020 primary. See also 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(g-5) (requiring the election authority in Illinois to send notice by mail of the rejection of a vote-by-mail ballot and allowing up to fourteen days after the election for the voter to cure); Tex. Elec. Code § 87.0431(a), (b)(3) (requiring notice of signature mismatch, but no opportunity to cure).

19 This concern is heightened in California, where the state proactively extended statutory deadlines for receipt of ballots by mail, allowing them to be counted if postmarked on or before Election Day and received by seventeen days after Election Day. Cal. Elec. Code § 3020(b)(1), (d); see also 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/19-8(b)-(c) (requiring that mail-in votes postmarked no later than Election Day to be counted). However, the cure period was not also extended, which means that voters have an even shorter period of time to verify their signature. Compare id. 5/2B-20, with id. 5/20-8 (making no changes in period to cure signature mismatches).

20 Lila Carpenter, Signature Match Laws Disproportionately Impact Voters Already on the Margins, ACLU (Nov. 2, 2018), https://perma.cc/U7JG-4QUU.

21 See, e.g., Jacob Pramuk, Fewer Voters Say They’re Voting by Mail amid Uproar over USPS Changes, CNBC/Change Research Polls Find, CNBC (Aug. 26, 2020), https://perma.cc/TCJ3-WBYG (describing swing-state poll indicating significant drops in voters who plan to vote by mail). Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 18 of 33

12

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

the COVID-19 pandemic, or to seek out ballot boxes. Yet far more voters are receiving ballots by mail than in any prior election. As a result, amici will need to augment their plans for in-person voting, mail-in voting, ballot drop boxes, and other election services, imposing significant administrative and operational burdens only two months before the General Election.

1. Many Amici Must Seek to Expand In-Person Voting Options and Resources.

Due to the unreliability of USPS mail, amici must now seek to increase in-person voting opportunities to the extent practicable. These changes must be implemented only two months before the General Election and in accordance with state and local pandemic-related public health orders and recommendations. Yet many polling locations—many of which are senior centers and living facilities—are now declining to serve in that capacity due to COVID-19 concerns.22 At the same time, amici may be unable to increase poll-worker staff at existing polling locations while maintaining a six-foot distance between work stations, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Given these constraints, some jurisdictions are now making significant changes to increase voting hours and otherwise supplement capacity to ensure all voters can safely exercise their right to vote. For instance, after the Postal Service informed the state of Texas of potential delays, to account for the uncertainty of whether voters will vote in person or by mail, Harris County approved an additional $17 million outlay to both extend early voting hours to 10 p.m. on multiple nights, add one 24-hour voting period, and

22 For example, as of the end of August 2020, five senior centers or living facilities in Santa Clara County have declined to serve as polling locations due to COVID-19-related concerns. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 19 of 33

13

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

provide drive-through options, as well as to obtain new equipment to process an anticipated record number of ballots received by mail.23

However, for other local jurisdictions, increasing in-person voting capacity is not an option. For example, the Yurok Tribe, which is located in rural Del Norte and Humboldt counties in California, passed emergency legislation requiring the General Election to be conducted entirely by mail because of COVID-19 associated risks.24 As a result, tribal voters are entirely dependent on the mail to vote. In an area where access to the Postal Service is already extremely limited,25 these voters now have no choice but to be subject to USPS’s delays, increasing the likelihood that their ballots will not arrive or be returned in time to be counted. Ultimately, due to uncertainty caused by the USPS changes, many amici will have to prepare for both scenarios: increased voting at polling locations, and increased use of mail-in ballots and ballot boxes—even though budgets are tight and time to prepare is short.

2. Many Amici Will Need to Add Official Ballot Drop Boxes, More Frequently Empty Drop Boxes, and Increase Messaging Around Drop Box Availability.

Particularly where it is not possible to increase polling locations, amici, where possible, will need to increase the number of official drop boxes, drop box pick-ups, and messaging about drop box availability. In Santa Clara County, because of the USPS changes, the Registrar of Voters will need to add three additional routes to pick up drop box ballots. The County will also

23 Zach Gespart, Harris County OKs $17M to Add Polls, Voting Hours and Drive-Thru Balloting For November Election, Houston Chronicle (Aug. 25, 2020), https://perma.cc/XYK4-XNDE.

24 Emergency Yurok Tribe Election Ordinance §§ 4003, 4203, 4401, 4502 (Aug. 11, 2020).

25 In some Yurok tribal areas, mail cannot be delivered to households; rather, members depend on access to transportation to a local Post Office to pick up and send mail. The local Post Office has limited business hours and depends on a postal processing site in Eureka, California, leading to further mail delivery delays. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 20 of 33

14

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

need to place twenty-three additional boxes at locations that had high volume return in the March 2020 primary and to increase its public messaging to urge greater drop box use. The County and other amici must now seek to identify funds to provide these additional services at a time when local and tribal government budgets are facing enormous strains due to mounting COVID-related community needs that dwarf shrinking revenue.

Other amici are constrained from increasing drop box availability, putting additional pressure on amici to find other ways to expand voting opportunities. In Ohio, for example, the Secretary of State has issued a directive prohibiting any Board of Elections from using more than one drop box location per county.26 That means that any resident of the City of Columbus, for example, can drop off their ballot at only one location—the Franklin County Board of Elections office—even though that location may be a long distance to travel, in some cases more than 25 miles roundtrip, for many residents of Columbus and broader Franklin County.27 The same is true for the City of Cincinnati, where the only drop box is located outside of the City and is hard to access by public transit. In Harris County—and all counties in Texas—drop boxes are not permitted, though voters may deposit their ballots at the voting clerk’s office. For these jurisdictions, even in the face of a pandemic, in-person voting will be the primary option for casting a vote due to the uncertainty caused by the USPS changes for voting by mail—putting

26 Ohio Sec’y of State, The Use of Drop Boxes and Additional Instructions for Curbside Voting (Aug. 12, 2020), https://perma.cc/392P-MZGN (“Boards of elections are prohibited from installing a drop box at any other location other than the board of elections.”).

27 In 2018, due to state restrictions, Franklin County only operated one early polling location. Almost half of the County’s residents who voted in-person before Election Day lived within five miles of the polling location; those that lived further away used it “sparingly.” Bill Bush, Few Will Travel Far to Franklin County’s Single Early-Voting Site, Analysis Finds, Columbus Dispatch, Nov. 11, 2018, https://perma.cc/EG59-CW6A. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 21 of 33

15

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

even greater pressure on these jurisdictions to boost in-person voting capacity while adhering to public health orders and recommendations amid shrinking budgets.28

3. Amici Must Absorb Increased Mail and Other Costs.

The USPS’s longstanding practice has been to treat all election mail as First Class mail, which means election mail receives priority and is typically delivered between two and five days after mailing.29 Now, USPS has announced that election mail will instead be treated as standard mail, with delivery timeframes between three and ten days,30 and possibly more when mail volumes are unusually high such as during the winter holidays. As a result, amici may need to pay approximately 35 cents more per piece of election mail to ensure it is treated as First Class mail31—a significant cost and logistical change with little time to locate funds. Other costs include a likely uptick in counter services required to address voting questions at various Registrars of Voters and Boards of Election offices and otherwise deal with the upheaval caused by the USPS changes. Marin County has already noted an increased number of concerned calls to its Registrar of Voters about USPS changes.

Taken together, these changes undermine the reliability of election-related mail—and amici’s election administration plans—on the eve of a Presidential General Election that amici

28 See Tex. Elec. Code § 86.006. Harris County has piloted allowing these ballot drop boxes at eleven of the clerk’s office’s locations, making ballot delivery more accessible. Whether these ballot drops can occur during an extended early voting period is currently being litigated. See Bethany Blankley, Candidates, Others Sue Secretary of State over Election Law Violations, Ctr. Square (Aug. 21, 2020), https://perma.cc/T42Z-LE2N.

29 See U.S. Postal Serv., State and Local Election Mail – User’s Guide, Pub. No. 632 (Jan. 2020), https://perma.cc/TGE5-2NW5.

30 Id.

31 Erin Spaht, VERIFY: No, the Post Office Did Not Triple the Cost States Pay to Mail Election Ballots, WUSA (Aug. 13, 2020), https://perma.cc/Y2K7-6Z3C. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 22 of 33

16

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

must administer and facilitate during the worst pandemic in a century. Moreover, these changes come at a time when, as detailed below, USPS delays will impose significant non-election related costs on amici.

II. USPS CHANGES UNDERMINE OTHER CORE LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS.

Separate and apart from the harms to election administration, the USPS changes will hamper other core local and tribal government functions. Indeed, USPS delays will further stress local government services at a time when they already face unprecedented challenges due to COVID-19. These impacts include delays in payments, enforcement actions, and critical health care services.

A. USPS Delays Interfere with Timely Payments to and from Amici and Increase Administrative Burdens.

USPS delays will impede revenue streams that fund essential services for residents. Amici collect millions to billions of dollars in parking tickets, tax payments, and user fees, which support police and fire services, public schools, libraries, and park districts, among other things. Much of this revenue flows through the postal system—and is time-sensitive. Year-to-date, for example, the City of Chicago’s Department of Finance has received over $18 million in mailed parking tickets, red light camera violations, and speed camera violations; over $233 million via mailed tax payments; and $422 million in mailed payments related to its Aviation Department.32 And in 2019, Chicago received over $349 million via 403,813 mailed payments for its Utility Billing and Customer Services, which include water, sewer, and garbage fees and related taxes.

32 These payments include, for example, payments for Landing Fees, Terminal Area Use Charges, Rents, Concessions, and other Passenger Facility Charges and Customer Facility Charges. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 23 of 33

17

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

Mail delays thus present a two-fold problem for local revenue streams. First, given that cities and counties collect up to billions of dollars through mail-in payments, even small delays can result in the loss of millions of dollars of earned interest income on savings or investments. These losses, in turn, directly impact amici’s bottom lines and budgets, which already are stretched thin during the pandemic and economic downturn. Second, mail delays create confusion for payees and additional operational burdens for local government employees. In Chicago, for example, an automated system electronically imposes late fees on parking ticket fines that are not paid within the allotted time. If a resident’s otherwise timely payment gets delayed or lost in the mail, Chicago must then track the original payment, manually remove the late fee, and communicate with the payee regarding the true amount owed. Given the volume of parking tickets processed daily, particularly in larger cities, these extra administrative burdens can add up to significant manpower and notice costs at a time when localities already are facing significant budget and staffing cuts.33

Relatedly, USPS delays pose a threat to residents who rely on the mail for certain local government payments. In Cincinnati, for example, many residents receive retirement service and pension payments from the City through the mail. A mail delay of just a few days—at a time when 24% of Ohioans either missed their most recent housing payment or are not confident that

33 See, e.g., Mark Munro, As COVID-19 Resurges, So Does the Threat to Local Budgets, Brookings Inst. (June 2020), https://perma.cc/T9GC-SHZP (reporting that in June 2020, states and localities across the country already had laid off 1.5 million government workers as a result of COVID-19 budget cuts); see also Tony Romm, Over 700 Cash-strapped Cities Halt Plans to Repair Roads, Water Systems, or Make Other Key Investments, Wash. Post (June 23, 2020), https://perma.cc/XS42-7BF5. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 24 of 33

18

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

they will be able to make their next one34—can make the difference between a missed or late payment and related fees. In the Yurok Tribe, fishermen confronted with depleted salmon stocks rely upon local governments to disburse disaster relief payments, sent through the mail, to make ends meet. Delays could be devastating for these fishermen. Similarly, the City of Chicago’s Department of Family and Support Services operates a Rental Assistance Program to help those who may face homelessness due to COVID-19. Within the past four months, Chicago received over 500 applications for this program through the mail. Even with a significant increase in funding for the program in response to the pandemic, the Department receives twice the number of applications than it can fund in a single month. Because the program has a finite budget that is inadequate to address local demand, and because applications often require back-and-forth to ensure all requirements have been met, mail delays could cause applicants to miss out on this program, or to not apply to other assistance programs for which they would be eligible if their rental assistance applications were denied. As a result, more Chicago residents could be at risk of becoming homeless.

B. USPS Delays Harm Amici’s Enforcement Efforts.

In addition to revenue collection, the USPS changes threaten to delay and undermine local enforcement efforts. Specifically, many local governments use the mail system to deliver code violation and fine notices. Timely delivery of these notices is thus crucial to correcting infractions as soon as possible and thereby protecting residents’ safety and well-being.

34 Samuel Stebbins & Grant Suneson, Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Missed Rent and Mortgage Payments Are Piling Up In Nearly Every State, USA Today (July 2020), https://perma.cc/DVA4-LQ7A. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 25 of 33

19

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

In Cincinnati, for example, the City relies on the mail system to enforce building standards and prevent mass foreclosures. Indeed, the Cincinnati Department of Buildings and Investigations—responsible for maintaining the health, safety, and welfare of Cincinnati residents in connection with residential and commercial buildings35—spends $41,000 on postage costs alone each year. Cincinnati uses this postage to send out critical notices concerning building demolitions and repairs that violate city code and face administrative proceedings.36 A delay in these notices may, as a result, perpetuate or create dangerous conditions for residents. Moreover, Cincinnati requires that within ten business days of filing a foreclosure action on residential property, banks register—through the mail—the vacant or foreclosed property with the city and maintain it until it is sold or reoccupied.37 Accurate and timely registrations are critical to Cincinnati’s efforts to track and combat the proliferation of abandoned properties and neighborhood blight, particularly in the present economic downturn.38

Code enforcement extends beyond building violations and, in fact, touches almost every aspect of residents’ everyday lives. In an average year, for example, the City of Chicago’s Department of Streets and Sanitation writes 40,000 to 50,000 tickets for violations, including overgrown weeds, overflowing garbage, and rat harborage—all of which are sent via USPS mail. Accordingly, even a few days’ delay in mail can create and exacerbate unsafe and unsanitary living conditions.

35 Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code § 1101-63.

36 Id. §§ 1101-57, 1101-61, 1101-81.

37 Id. § 1123-05.

38 See supra, note 33. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 26 of 33

20

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

More generally, amici rely upon the mail for basic registration and authorization functions. Chicago’s Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, for example, depends on the mail to send out business license applications, certificates, and account documents, including new licenses, cancellation forms, and license payments. Delays in this official correspondence can create significant confusion and backlogs in the licensing process, thus adding to the City’s administrative burdens and harming businesses forced to delay their operations while waiting on documents.

C. USPS Delays Undermine Critical Local Health Care Services.

USPS delays present a particularly acute problem for locally administered health care services, which many amici provide to millions of residents. Many of these local health care systems use the mail system to provide aspects of this care.

Cook County, Illinois, for example, operates one of the largest hospital systems in the nation. In this role, Cook County Health’s mail order pharmacy fulfills more than 20,000 prescriptions each month and relies on USPS to deliver prescriptions to patients.39 In July 2020, 23% of those prescriptions—more than 5,000 prescriptions—were delayed.40 In comparison, less than 1% of prescriptions faced delays in March of 2020.41 And already-vulnerable populations are disproportionately impacted by these delays. In certain zip codes within the Chicago area’s South Side neighborhoods, for example, as many of 50% of Cook County Health’s mail order

39 Cook County Government, Cook County Health Patients Experience Major Delays in Mail Deliveries for Daily Medical Prescriptions (Aug. 24, 2020), https://perma.cc/NBH3-HH43.

40 Id.

41 Id. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 27 of 33

21

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

prescriptions faced mail delays in July.42 Similarly, members of the Yurok Tribe—many of whom already face severely limited mail conditions—depend on mail order prescriptions delivered through the United Indian Health Services.43 The Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (“DHS”) has seen a marked increase in patients receiving their prescriptions by mail during the COVID-19 pandemic, jumping from about 15-16% prior to the pandemic to over 70-72% of patients during it. However, DHS reports that since the USPS policy changes, delivery times for prescriptions have shifted from three to five days to as long as three weeks.

These medication delays have life-threatening consequences, particularly when in-person options pose significant health risks during the pandemic. As the Chief Medical Officer at Cook County Health has explained, “[i]n many cases, these [delayed prescriptions] are life-saving medications that treat diabetes, hypertension and other chronic illnesses. Without these medications, patients are at risk for complications that could lead to emergency room visits and hospitalizations at a time when we are asking people to stay home.”44 Indeed, the Postal Service’s cost-cutting measures will exacerbate the spread of COVID-19 in more ways than one: local government health care providers not only rely upon mail-prescriptions to encourage patients to stay home, but also use the postal system for infectious disease contact tracing and quarantine notices for individuals without reliable internet or phone. A postal delay of just one

42 Id.

43 The Yurok Tribe is one of nine tribes that joined a consortium to operate the United Indian Health Services’ network of clinics. United Indian Health Servs., Consortium Tribes, https://perma.cc/KT53-35ZS. During the pandemic, the network has recommended that patients receive their prescriptions by mail to avoid in-person contact. United Indian Health Servs, UIHS COVID-19 Response, Facebook (Apr. 2, 2020), https://perma.cc/C3SM-GBW8.

44 Cook County Government, supra 39. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 28 of 33

22

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

day could, as a result, lead to innumerable infections if an unknowingly infected person goes to work or school while waiting for results, undermining efforts to control an outbreak.

Amici’s mail-related health care services extend beyond prescription programs and the mailing of COVID-19 notices and test results. The State of Ohio, for example, has the fourth highest rate of opioid-involved overdose deaths in the country,45 and Columbus and its surrounding suburbs have the highest number of overdose deaths—543 in 2019—in the state.46 To combat this crisis, Columbus mails free naloxone kits—used to prevent overdoses—through the mail to clinic providers and others.47 A delay in receiving these kits could directly result in preventable deaths. Relatedly, through the mail, the City of Cincinnati provides testing for sexually-transmitted diseases and screening for cancer and other chronic illnesses, such as diabetes.48 And because testing results are confidential, the City mails notices to vulnerable patients, including elderly or unsheltered community members, to request that they follow up with the Department of Health via phone or in person. In these instances, mail delays could worsen health outcomes not only for the recipients, but also for those with whom they may come into contact.

45 Nat’l Inst. of Health, National institute on Drug Abuse: Opioid Summaries by State (2018), https://perma.cc/EV5W-32WA.

46 Catherine Candisky, Ohio Drug Overdose Deaths Back on Rise, Columbus Dispatch (July 21, 2020), https://perma.cc/BP65-LQCU.

47 Columbus, Ohio, Access to Naloxone, https://perma.cc/9ZZ3-CVTU.

48 U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., Cincinnati City Health Department: Northside Health Center, https://perma.cc/A62G-BSEX. Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 29 of 33

23

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LOCAL & TRIBAL

GOVERNMENTS ISO PLAINTIFFS

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, amici urge the Court to grant Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.

Respectfully submitted,

MARCEL S. PRATT

Solicitor of the City of Philadelphia

By: /s/ Sean McGrath

Diana P. Cortes (PA ID No. 204274)

Chair, Litigation Group

Eleanor N. Ewing (PA ID No. 28226)

Chief Deputy City Solicitor

Benjamin H. Field (PA ID No. 204569)

Divisional Deputy City Solicitor

Sean McGrath (PA ID No. 322895)

Assistant City Solicitor

Michael W. Pfautz (PA ID No. 325323)

Assistant City Solicitor

Affirmative & Special Litigation

City of Philadelphia Law Department

1515 Arch Street, 15th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19102

sean.mcgrath@phila.gov

Tel. (215) 683-5444

Fax (215) 683-5299

Attorneys for the City of Philadelphia

/s/ Lauren E. Miller

Jessica M. Scheller

Chief; Advice, Business & Complex Litigation Division

Lauren E. Miller

Special Assistant State’s Attorney

Civil Actions Bureau - Affirmative & Impact Litigation

Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office

500 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, IL 60602

Attorneys for Cook County, Illinois

JAMES R. WILLIAMS

COUNTY COUNSEL

By: /s/ Julia B. Spiegel

James R. Williams, County Counsel

Greta S. Hansen, Chief Assistant County Counsel

Tony LoPresti, Assistant County Counsel

Laura S. Trice, Lead Deputy County Counsel

Julia B. Spiegel, Deputy County Counsel

Mary E. Hanna-Weir, Deputy County Counsel

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor

San José, California 95110-1770

Attorneys for the County of Santa Clara, California

ZACH KLEIN

CITY ATTORNEY

/s/ Richard N. Coglianese

Zach Klein, City Attorney

Richard N. Coglianese, City Solicitor General

77 South Front Street, 4th Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215

/s/ Jonathan B. Miller

Jonathan B. Miller, Legal Director

LiJia Gong, Counsel

Sophia TonNu, Legal Fellow

Victoria Stilwell, Staff Attorney

PUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT

4096 Piedmont Avenue #149,

Oakland, California 94611

Attorneys for the City of Columbus, Ohio

Dated: September 4, 2020 Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 30 of 33

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL YIBIN SHEN City Attorney 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Room #280 Alameda, CA 94501 Attorney for the City of Alameda, California NINA HICKSON City Attorney 55 Trinity Avenue, Suite 5000 Atlanta, GA 30303 Attorney for the City of Atlanta, Georgia ANNE L. MORGAN City Attorney P.O. Box 1546 Austin, TX 78701-1546 Attorney for the City of Austin, Texas FARIMAH FAIZ BROWN City Attorney 2180 Milvia Street, 4th Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Attorney for the City of Berkeley, California EUGENE L. O'FLAHERTY Corporation Counsel City Hall, Room 615 Boston MA, 02201 Attorney for the City of Boston, Massachusetts NANCY E. GLOWA City Solicitor City of Cambridge 795 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Attorney for the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts MARK A. FLESSNER Corporation Counsel 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60602 Attorney for the City of Chicago, Illinois ANDREW W. GARTH Interim City Solicitor 801 Plum Street, Room 214 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Attorney for the City of Cincinnati, Ohio BARBARA J. DOSECK City Attorney 101 W. Third Street P.O. Box 22 Dayton, OH 45401 Attorney for the City of Dayton, Ohio RAFAEL E. ALVARADO JR. City Attorney 2415 University Ave. East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Attorney for the City of East Palo Alto, California ANGELA WHEELER City Attorney 1101 S. Saginaw Street Flint, MI 48502 Attorney for the City of Flint, Michigan RODNEY POL, JR. City Attorney 401 Broadway, Suite 101 Gary, IN 46402 Attorney for the City of Gary, Indiana VINCE RYAN Harris County Attorney 1019 Congress St., 15th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Attorney for Harris County, Texas RONALD C. LEWIS City Attorney 900 Bagby, 4th Floor Houston, TX 77002 Attorney for the City of Houston, Texas Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 31 of 33

MARY C. WICKHAM County Counsel 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attorney for the County of Los Angeles, California MICHAEL N. FEUER City Attorney 200 North Main Street, 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, California MICHAEL HAAS City Attorney 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Room 401 Madison, WI 53703 Attorney for the City of Madison, Wisconsin BRIAN E. WASHINGTON County Counsel 3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 275 San Rafael, CA 94903 Attorney for Marin County, California LESLIE J. GIRARD County Counsel 168 West Alisal Street, 3rd Floor Salinas, CA 93901 Counsel for the County of Monterey, California BARBARA J. PARKER City Attorney One Frank Ogawa Plaza Sixth Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Attorney for the City of Oakland, California YVONNE S. HILTON City Solicitor City County Building 414 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Attorney for the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania TRACY REEVE City Attorney 1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 430 Portland, OR 97204 Attorney for the City of Portland, Oregon LYNDSEY M. OLSON City Attorney 400 City Hall and Courthouse 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Saint Paul, MN 55102 Attorney for the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota ANTHONY P. CONDOTTI City Attorney Atchinson, Barisone & Condotti P.O. Box 481 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 Attorney for the City of Santa Cruz, California PETER S. HOLMES Seattle City Attorney 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104-7097 Attorney for the City of Seattle, Washington

FRANCIS X. WRIGHT, JR. City Solicitor 93 Highland Avenue Somerville, MA 02143 Attorney for the City of Somerville, Massachusetts Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 32 of 33

MICHAEL JENKINS City Attorney Best Best & Krieger, LLP 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Ste 110 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Attorney for the City of West Hollywood, California MAGGIE POFFENBARGER Associate General Counsel 190 Klamath Blvd. Klamath, CA 95548 Attorney for the Yurok Tribe

Case 2:20-cv-04096-GAM Document 24-2 Filed 09/04/20 Page 33 of 33


This press release was produced by the Santa Clara County Government. The views expressed here are the author’s own.