Politics & Government

CA Proposition 3: Makes Progressive Income Tax Rates Permanent

Proposition 3 would make permanent California's progressive income tax brackets, which require the wealthiest residents to pay more.

SACRAMENTO, CA — Buried by the debate over Proposition 40 — California's "Billionaire Tax" — is another tax measure for Golden State voters to consider this November: Proposition 3.

Currently, state income tax rates adjust upward for high wage-earners under a measure approved by California voters in 2012 (Proposition 30) and extended in 2016 (Proposition 55). The progressive tax brackets, which require the wealthiest residents to pay more, are set to expire in 2031. Proposition 3 would make them permanent.

Today, for example, joint filers in California earning up to $22,000 annually pay a 1% personal income tax rate, compared to 12.3% for joint filers earning over $1.5 million per year. The brackets would become permanent if Prop. 3 passes.

Find out what's happening in Murrietafor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Currently, state income tax rates adjust upward for high wage-earners under a measure approved by California voters in 2012 (Proposition 30) and extended in 2016 (Proposition 55). The bolded brackets above were added as a result of Prop. 30 and extended under Prop. 16. Proposition 3 would make these tax brackets permanent. (Image: California Secretary of State)

According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, passing Prop. 3 would preserve $5 billion to $15 billion in annual state income tax revenue.

California state income tax is the largest source of revenue for the state's General Fund, supplying nearly half of total state revenue. It pays for public education, health and human services programs, corrections and prisons, higher education, and the general operations of state government and local community assistance.

Find out what's happening in Murrietafor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Proposition 3 maintains broad support among California leaders. Despite the tax implications for high earners, Building a Better California endorsed Prop. 3, stating revenues are needed "to protect funding for our schools and healthcare by maintaining the state’s progressive income tax rates, which the wealthiest 2% have paid for 15 years."

But the measure's opponents argue that Prop. 3 could spur wealthy Californians to flee for lower-tax states, taking jobs and revenue with them. While California did experience a small exodus of wealthy residents following the 2012 passage of Prop. 30, the 2016 passage of Prop. 55 didn't have the same effect.

Despite predictions of mass millionaire flight after the 2016 extension, California's share of million-dollar tax filers actually expanded from roughly 14.9% in 2010 to over 16% in subsequent years.

Election & Voter Resources

For official information regarding ballot measures, voter registration, and polling logistics, consult the following resources:

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.