Community Corner
Letter to the Editor: Don't Sign Lund II Referendum
"Saving Pleasanton's hillsides and PP" not the real reason behind this referendum, letter writer asserts.

Dear Editor:
Bridle Creek/ Sycamore Heights residents who want to overturn Lund Ranch II at taxpayers expense of up to $247,000 have branded their efforts under the illusion that they are “Saving Pleasanton’s hillsides and PP”. Sounds praiseworthy to “protect” all of Pleasanton from the “hillside sprawl” but what this illusion really amounts to is a small group of residents who want to push traffic out of their neighborhood, by referendum, into another.
The illusion that Lund Ranch II violates PP is false. Listen to the voices of truth who authored PP. They will NOT be signing this referendum.
Find out what's happening in Pleasantonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
By pushing this idea of “Saving hillsides” and “protecting PP” in the media, outside schools, at the Farmers Market, and other local shopping areas by an outside firm hired to collect signatures, the Bridle Creek/Sycamore Heights residents are hoping many Pleasanton residents will believe their illusion and sign the referendum. Please don’t be fooled by the catchy phrases and deception. I for one stand with the truth tellers and will NOT be signing the referendum.
Teresa Cross
Find out what's happening in Pleasantonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Previous Coverage:
- Lund Ranch II Development Project Approved
- Letter to the Editor: Don’t Support Lund Ranch II Petition Drive
- Letter to the Editor: More Opposition to Lund Ranch II Referendum
--Image via Patch archive
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.