Community Corner

Letter to the Editor: More Opposition to Lund Ranch II Referendum

Residents impacted by traffic from the approved development disagree about what should be done.

Previous:

Editor’s Note: Patch continues to receive letters to the editor regarding the Lund Ranch II petition drive.
--

Editor,

Find out what's happening in Pleasantonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Traffic impact on neighborhoods is the heart of our concern over development in Southeast Pleasanton dating back to Bonde Ranch in 1991. The Lund Ranch II PUD-25 that passed recently by the City Council honors previous agreements/understandings made by past Pleasanton City Council’s, and the compromises agreed to with the Ventana Hills/Mission Hills neighborhoods and City Staff, represented in their recommendation to City Council for Lund Ranch II.

*The Ventana Hills Steering Committee supports Council’s decision, which represents compromises from all parties. Although all traffic was slated to exit through Sycamore Heights/Bridle Creek (who were made aware in their CC&R’s before purchasing their homes), the plan splits the traffic (including 15 homes on Middleton Place in the Bonde development). 27 will exit Lund Ranch Rd. in Ventana Hills/Mission Hills and 31 will exit through Sycamore Heights/Bridle Creek. We do NOT support a referendum.

Find out what's happening in Pleasantonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Thank You,

George T. Dort, Pleasanton

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.