Politics & Government

Abortion Pills Available For Now In Connecticut, Supreme Court Says

The challenge to mifepristone is the first abortion controversy to reach the nation's highest court since it struck down Roe v. Wade.

CONNECTICUT — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday stopped a lower court’s restrictions on the abortion pill mifepristone from taking effect, a win for the Biden administration. Women in Connecticut can continue to access the drug that his been in use for more than two decades.

The justices granted emergency requests from the Biden administration and New York-based Danco Laboratories, the maker of the drug, to reject limits on mifepristone’s use imposed by lower courts, at least as long as the legal case makes it way through the courts.

The drug has been approved for use in the U.S. since 2000 and more than 5 million people have used it. Mifepristone is used in combination with a second drug, misoprostol, in more than half of all abortions in the U.S.

Find out what's happening in Across Connecticutfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The underlying issue in the case is whether the Food and Drug Administration went through the proper procedures in approving the drug. Although the court maintained FDA approval of mifepristone for now, it’s likely not the last time the court will weigh in on the issue.

Essentially, the court said, medical abortions are a state issue.

Find out what's happening in Across Connecticutfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Gov. Ned Lamont said, "Decisions on reproductive healthcare should only be made between a patient and their doctor without the interference of politicians or politically-motivated judges. Today’s Supreme Court decision to preserve access to mifepristone is the right course for the court to take before making a monumental decision on Americans’ access to healthcare, particularly when Americans have been safely using this medication for decades with the support of their doctors."

The case before the high court stems from a Texas judge’s April 7 ruling. Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ordered a hold on federal approval of mifepristone, the drug that is used to carry out a majority of U.S. abortions and was approved by the FDA in 2000. Kacsmaryk’s decision overruled decades of scientific approval.

Less than a week later, a federal appeals court modified the ruling so that mifepristone would remain available while the case continues, but with limits. The appeals court said that the drug can’t be mailed or dispensed as a generic and that patients who seek it need to make three in-person visits with a doctor, among other things.

The generic version of mifepristone makes up two-thirds of the supply in the United States, its manufacturer, Las Vegas-based GenBioPro Inc., wrote in a court filing that underscored the perils of allowing the restrictions to be put into effect.

The court also said the drug should only be approved through seven weeks of pregnancy for now, even though the FDA since 2016 has endorsed its use through 10 weeks of pregnancy.

Complicating the situation, a ruling by a federal judge in Washington ordered the FDA to preserve access to mifepristone in 17 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia that filed a separate lawsuit.

The challenge to mifepristone is the first abortion controversy to reach the nation’s highest court since it struck down Roe v. Wade last June. States have since put together a patchwork of abortion laws, a dozen of them enacting laws so restrictive that abortions are effectively banned.

In Connecticut, abortion is legal and available, and a right to an abortion has been codified in Connecticut state law since 1990. Legislators have enacted later laws which expand abortion access even further.

Even in states where abortion is legal and available, providers would have to limit services to in-clinic procedural abortion if mifepristone became unavailable or switch to a misoprostol-only abortion regime, according to the Guttmacher Institute. The drug can be used alone to terminate pregnancies, but medical experts have said it is not as effective as the standard two-pill regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol.

Also, patients whose providers prescribe abortion pills during clinic visits or via telehealth would no longer be able to pick them up from participating pharmacies or in the mail.

Attorney General William Tong issued the following statement after the U.S Supreme Court further stayed a Texas judge’s medication abortion decision that would suspend the Food and Drug Administration’s long-standing approval of mifepristone. The Texas judge’s order is now on hold until the federal Fifth Circuit hears and resolves the FDA’s appeal and the Supreme Court resolves any certiorari petition.

"Today’s stay preserves access to safe, legal medication abortion. We’re done with radical, misogynist politicians who want to micromanage our lives and bodily autonomy," Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a statement released Friday.

The impact would be far greater in 10 states — Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Montana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Washington — where women’s access would be even more limited if providers don’t offer a regimen of misoprostol alone, according to Guttmacher.

The Associated Press contributed reporting.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.