Neighbor News
Easton EMS-Vote No Today-Polls Open Until 8 pm--Staples School
One Million of the Four is Other People's Money-The Other Three Million is Yours
Please review the attached photos to understand how renovating Easton's EMS could cost over four million dollars. Approximately one million of that is "Other People Money," but three million is yours!
This so-called "cost-effective” plan includes six private offices, four bedrooms, five bathrooms, a large classroom, two extra conference rooms, a reception area, and a laundry room.
The consultant we hired to assess our First Responder system recommended building a new EMS facility next to or integrated with the Fire Department. This would effectively encourage both services to share resources and lower taxpayer costs.
Find out what's happening in Weston-Redding-Eastonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
This practical recommendation was dismissed. Instead, we are renovating a 99-year-old building. Demolishing a structure or building a new one on another plot of land is almost always cheaper than renovating an existing building.
Considering Easton has rejected common sense, do we really need an EMS building with six private offices and five bathrooms? I don’t think so, and I strongly urge you to vote against this proposal on Tuesday. An EMS building should be a basic garage with minimal amenities, like the Firehouse.
Find out what's happening in Weston-Redding-Eastonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Easton has a history of amending extravagant building proposals. The original Staples school design included an auditorium and a cafeteria. Andy Kachele (Board of Finance) and others suggested a "cafetorium compromise" that dramatically reduced costs. Where is the compromise in this EMS plan?
The town has committed to purchasing upgraded police radios for around three million dollars. This is a much-needed upgrade, and the price is fixed; it doesn't include “amenity items”. I have heard the Board of Education will be looking for a significant annual budget increase, around 7%.
EMS Proponents argue that the project won't raise future taxes because much of the town's portion will come from our Unallocated Fund Balance (the extra tax money the town collects each year and keeps in reserve for emergencies).
The Unallocated Fund Balance is still your tax money. Its size is crucial in determining Easton’s credit rating. If we spend down our rainy-day fund, I believe taxes must increase to maintain our credit rating.
Proponents have labeled opponents of this six private office, four-bedroom, five bathroom, three conference room, project with its reception area, art, copper sub-roof and other amenities as "Anti-EMS."
Nothing could be further from the truth. We are “Pro-EMS,” “Pro-Taxpayer," and “Pro-Commonsense.”
Vote no today. It’s time to go back to the drawing board.
Dana Benson
Pond Rd.
Easton, CT
