The board president, who has been accused of micromanagement, was involved with "select student records."
Critics said the district's data is false. Even the school board leader has cast doubt upon the numbers.
A permanent replacement is not expected for another year, officials said.
Central offers a course that is linked to a test for college credit. It doesn't exist at South.
The board reversed a policy requiring tuition from such students. It was in response to residents' requests.
The progress was praised, but a committee member said, "I don't know how we got there."
Members expressed frustration with the pace of drafting long-term goals. "We're spinning our wheels," an official said.
The board unanimously voted for a "notice to remedy" for the teacher.
The school board delayed action on naming a new assistant superintendent for academics.
The district released "intentionally vague data," the board president said. Doing so, she said, erodes trust.
A board ally objects to the secrecy. Some districts provide such information.
The district released the records after a watchdog group sought them. Officials did not explain the reversal.
The gap between Central and South's opportunities continues, the watchdog said.
The district should have divulged the recipients of legal advice and other information, the agency said.
The district had incorrectly described previous data, an official said.
The debate also revealed a communication gap among top officials.
The school's data gives no clear answer. Meanwhile, a board member wants to bid farewell to "alignment" effort.
The new headquarters building is appropriately sized, an official said.
The Hinsdalean said its attorney advised against running the ad. A resident disputes the paper's contention about her public statement.
The district never intended to charge tuition to foreign exchange students, a former board president said.
A board member said she took notes from a closed-meeting recording after the district contended such notes do not exist.
The district's policy is unlike most of its counterparts. Board members want to look into it.
An official called for a "pause" in destroying records in the interests of openness.
That is expected to change with a new policy approved by the school board.
The local schools compare well to their similarly wealthy counterparts in the suburbs, the district asserted.
The district has yet to explain a public benefit for removing online documents.
The attorney general has no power to compel openness in this case, the district contended.
The district is keeping secret a message in a billing dispute with its former lawyer.
This time, the district issued no letters emphasizing confidentiality to departing board members.
The district's public message was "inappropriate" and "misleading," a former board member's husband said.
The incoming principal received "glowing" recommendations. But her bosses said issues exist over communications and transparency.
The official said she took notes, but the district asserted no such records exist.
Board members generally agreed on a schedule with fewer meetings.
The program coordinator said changes for next year are not equitable for both schools.
A student leader recommended a requirement to help deal with such situations.
A member referred to "strained relationships," while another hailed the board for a "fantastic" job.
She is set to replace someone who is leaving after four years at the helm.
The attorney responded to a resident's concern about a possible illegality.
The board is departing from its practice that lasted until early 2024.
Constant questioning of the staff's integrity disrupts the learning environment, the board says.