Politics & Government

Sudbury Election Guide: Get Ready to Vote on Nov. 8

Here's everything you need to know about Sudbury's state and presidential election.

SUDBURY, MA—OK Sudbury residents, it’s almost time to join the rest of the country to vote not only for our next president, but state senators, representatives in congress, councillors, sheriff, and on four controversial ballot initiatives. Provided, of course, that you didn't take advantage of early voting.

Here’s everything you need to know about the election on Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2016.

First, polls in Sudbury will be open 6:15 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Find out what's happening in Sudburyfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Polling locations:

  • Precincts 1, 1A, 2 and 5 vote at the Fairbank Community Center, 40 Fairbank Road
  • Precincts 3 and 4 vote at the Town Hall, 322 Concord Road

Oct. 19 was the deadline to register to vote or for registered voters to make any changes to their registration.

Find out what's happening in Sudburyfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Click here to check your voter registration status.

Sudbury officials have have received the absentee ballots from the Secretary of the Commonwealth for the State Election. Voters who qualify to vote by absentee ballot may submit an application to have a ballot mailed or voters wishing to vote in person at the Town Clerk’s Office may do so upon completing an absentee ballot application. Deadline to apply for an absentee ballot is noon on Monday, Nov. 7. Click here for additional information on Absentee Ballots.

Who is running:

President and Vice President:

  • Trump and Pence
  • Clinton and Kaine
  • Johnson and Weld
  • Stein and Baraka

Precinct 1 (click to view specimen ballot)

Representative in Congress, Third District:

  • Nicola S. Tsongas (D)
  • Ann Woffard (R)

Councillor:

  • Marilyn M. Pettito Devaney (D)

State Senator, Third Middlesex District:

  • Michael J. Barrett (D)

State Representative, 13th Middlesex District

  • Carmine Lawrence Gentile (D)

Sheriff:

  • Peter J. Koutoujian (D)

Precincts 2 and 3 (click to view specimen ballot)

Representative in Congress, Fifth District:

  • Katherine M. Clark (D)

Councillor:

  • Marilyn M. Pettito Devaney (D)

State Senator, Middlesex and Worcester District:

  • James Eldridge (D)
  • Tim Busiek (R)
  • Terra Friedrichs (GP)

State Representative

  • Carmine Lawrence Gentile (D)

Sheriff:

  • Peter J. Koutoujian (D)

Precincts 1A, 4 and 5 (click to view specimen ballot)

Representative in Congress, Fifth District:

  • Katherine M. Clark (D)

Councillor:

  • Marilyn M. Pettito Devaney (D)

State Senator, Third Middlesex District:

  • Michael J. Barrett (D)

State Representative

  • Carmine Lawrence Gentile (D)

Sheriff:

  • Peter J. Koutoujian (D)

The Ballot Questions:

Ballot Question 1: More Slots Licenses

The Question
"Expanding slot machine gaming. A 'yes' vote would allow a second slots parlor to exist in Massachusetts. The 2011 gambling law currently allows for up to three resort casinos and one slots parlor. The slots parlor license is owned by Penn National Gaming, which operates Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville."

The Players

The man behind the ballot push, according to The Boston Globe, is a "secretive" developer who's been buying up property near Suffolk Downs, with hopes to build a luxury hotel and gambling facility there. Opposed is Revere Mayor Brian Arrigo, whose city would be directly impacted. Staying tellingly neutral are other big gaming figures in the state, who would face increased competition should the ballot initiative succeed, the Globe reports. There is also a formalized opposition to the measure from the newly formed Committee for Sustainable and Responsible Economic Development.

Ballot Question 2: More Charter Schools

The Question

The Massachusetts Authorization of Additional Charter Schools and Charter School Expansion Initiative, also known as Question 2, is on the Nov. 8, 2016, ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute.
A "yes" vote supports this proposal to authorize up to 12 new charter schools or enrollment expansions in existing charter schools by the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education per year.
A "no" vote opposes this proposal to authorize up to 12 new charter schools or enrollment expansions in existing charter schools.

The Players

The state Democratic Party recently moved to oppose lifting the charter cap, aligning with many of its biggest supporters, including several state teachers' unions, most prominently the Massachusetts Teachers' Association. However, it's not a cut-and-dry, partisan issue. Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican, supports lifting the cap and allowing more charter schools in Massachusetts, but so do several Democratic state lawmakers. Great Schools Massachusetts is mounting a million-dollar campaign for a "yes" on the ballot.

Ballot Question 3: More Free-Range Chickens

The Question

The Massachusetts Minimum Size Requirements for Question 3, also known as Question 3, is on the Nov. 8, 2016, ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute. It will be Question 3 on the ballot.

A "yes" vote is a vote in favor of prohibiting the sale of eggs, veal or pork of a farm animal "confined in a cruel manner."

A "no" vote is a vote against prohibiting the sale of eggs, veal or pork of a farm animal "confined in a cruel manner."

Question 3 would define "confined in a cruel manner" as "confined so as to prevent a covered animal from lying down, standing up, fully extending the animal’s limbs, or turning around freely."[1]
Massachusetts' Attorney General would be responsible for enforcing the law. A maximum fine of $1,000 could be levied for each violation.

The Players
Animal welfare advocacy group Citizens for Farm Animal Protection is the coalition supporting the Massachusetts ballot initiative. The egg industry isn't such a fan, saying the requirements fly in the face of logic, not to mention the laws of supply and demand. Find the full story on both sides from The Atlantic here.

Ballot Question 4: More Marijuana

The Question
The Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization Initiative.

A "yes" vote supports this proposal to allow the use, cultivation, possession and distribution of recreational marijuana for individuals at least 21 years old.

A "no" vote opposes this proposal to allow the use, cultivation, possession and distribution of recreational marijuana for individuals at least 21 years old.

The Players
Pushing for this initiative is a group called The Massachusetts Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol. Aligned against it is a bipartisan group of powerful politicians including the state's governor, Boston's mayor and more members of the Campaign for a Safe and Healthy Massachusetts.

Get results and updates on Sudbury Patch.

Alison Bauter contributed to this report.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.