Schools

Brick Has N.J.'s Second Lowest Rate Of 'Highly Effective' Teachers, State Says

But Brick had the highest number of teachers deemed "effective" in the state's newly released statistics.

The New Jersey Department of Education has come up with a list that was developed under a new teacher and administrator evaluation system, with educators in the 2013-14 school year graded on a scale of four measures.

According to the list, Brick has the second lowest percentage of “highly effective” teachers in New Jersey, at 2 percent. But the district has the highest percentage of “effective” teachers in the state, at 97 percent.

Here are the bottom districts in the state based on the percentage of highly effective teachers on its faculty. The bottom 25 districts and their percentages are:

Find out what's happening in Brickfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

  • BAYONNE CITY: 0.020618557
  • BRICK: 0.021505376
  • WEST ORANGE: 0.024163569
  • ATLANTIC CITY: 0.029850746
  • CAMDEN: 0.032544379
  • GLOUCESTER TWP: 0.038910506
  • SOUTH PLAINFIELD BORO: 0.039711191
  • PASSAIC: 0.04035433
  • ROSELLE BORO: 0.041493776
  • GALLOWAY 0.046822742
  • NUTLEY: 0.04797048
  • JERSEY CITY: 0.051884484
  • PEQUANNOCK: 0.051886792
  • BURLINGTON TWP: 0.052980132
  • WINSLOW: 0.057831325
  • MIDDLESEX BORO: 0.061349693
  • PLEASANTVILLE CITY: 0.061583578
  • SPRINGFIELD: 0.062111801
  • PENNSAUKEN: 0.063400576
  • OCEAN CITY: 0.064171123
  • WESTFIELD: 0.070362473
  • ESSEX CO VOC-TECH: 0.072222222
  • KINNELON BORO: 0.074712644
  • MANALAPAN-ENGLISHTOWN: 0.075801749
  • HACKENSACK: 0.081632653

Here is the top-25 list of districts labeled “effective:”

  • BRICK: 0.971774194
  • BAYONNE CITY: 0.967599411
  • WEST ORANGE: 0.960966543
  • GALLOWAY: 0.953177258
  • SOUTH PLAINFIELD BORO: 0.953068592
  • GLOUCESTER TWP: 0.947470817
  • BURLINGTON TWP: 0.940397351
  • ATLANTIC CITY: 0.93880597
  • MIDDLESEX BORO: 0.932515337
  • PASSAIC: 0.929133858
  • OCEAN CITY: 0.92513369
  • MANALAPAN-ENGLISHTOWN: 0.924198251
  • WESTFIELD TOWN: 0.921108742
  • KINNELON BORO: 0.91954023
  • COLLINGSWOOD BORO: 0.912280702
  • PLEASANTVILLE: 0.91202346
  • PENNSAUKEN: 0.910662824
  • HIGHLAND PARK: 0.909090909
  • WINSLOW: 0.908433735
  • HACKENSACK: 0.908163265
  • SPRINGFIELD: 0.906832298
  • PEQUANNOCK: 0.905660377
  • ESSEX CO VOC-TECH: 0.905555556
  • SOUTHERN REGIONAL: 0.900452489
  • KEARNY: 0.8997669

For the entire list, go here: Top-to-bottom list of districts/schools with highly performing teachers.

Find out what's happening in Brickfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Teachers in each school were ranked on a four-level scale, from ineffective, to partially ineffective, to effective, to highly effective as part of the new AchieveNJ evaluation system.

Because the disclosure of evaluation data of any particular employee is, by law, completely confidential, discrepancies in the overall numbers will be seen. The Department of Education calls this its suppression rate, meaning it won’t release the figures of specific categories of educators. From the DOE, regarding suppression:cleardot.gif

  1. Records that have n-size < 10 are suppressed, e.g., if 9 or fewer staff received a rating of Ineffective, the record will be suppressed (the record will not be part of the data file). The total will always be displayed irrespective of n-size.
  2. When one performance level is suppressed due to n-size, and all 4 performance level ratings are present, the next lowest staff count will be suppressed (record will not be part of the file), to disallow roll-up to find the rating count for the first level suppressed and thus potentially identify educators.
  3. Records with 100 percent staff in one performance level are suppressed, as per state law (since in this case, any viewer would know each educator’s evaluation rating). In such cases, only the total staff count record will be provided as part of the data file.”

A total of seven building administrators – principals, assistant principals, vice principals – were evaluated in the school district, but those results were not disclosed. All data submitted to the state was self-reported, meaning evaluations were done by administrators and colleagues inside each school building.

The majority of teachers across the state evaluated well, the DOE reported, but there were still a percentage of teachers that would need further training or changes in their instruction techniques.

According to the report, some 2,900 teachers – providing instruction to more than 180,000 students that school year – across the state were considered ineffective or partially effective, the state noted. As a result of those ratings, AchieveNJ requires those teachers to receive extra support and demonstrate progress over time to earn or maintain tenure, the report said.

“The real story of the first year of AchieveNJ,” said Peter Shulman, Assistant Commissioner of Education and Chief Talent Officer in a press release, “is that educators have risen to the challenge of improving feedback for all teachers and leaders. While one year of this new data is insufficient for identifying sustained trends or making sweeping conclusions about the state’s teaching staff, we are proud of this significant improvement and the personalized support all educators are now receiving.”

What do you think of the teachers’ evaluations? Do they rank where you feel they should? Or the scores too high, too low? Tell us in the comments.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.