34 Districts Join Point Pleasant To Fight School Aid Cuts

As a bill that would cut aid to dozens of school districts across New Jersey advanced out of committee on Tuesday, a coalition of districts – including Point Pleasant – that stand to be hurt significantly are calling on state legislators to take a closer look before they move forward.

Senate Bill S2, proposed by state Senate President Stephen Sweeney, would cut so-called adjustment aid to districts across New Jersey in order to push more aid to severely underfunded school districts. Sweeney, who has taken a hard line on the cuts, says districts receiving the aid are overfunded. It was approved by the state Senate Budget Committee and heads to the Senate for a full vote Thursday.

Point Pleasant Boro stands to lose $149,240 under the plan. Read more: 188 School Districts May Have To Raise Taxes To Stop NJ Shutdown

Opponents of the bill say the formula used to determine state aid is severely flawed and doesn't properly calculate wealth and income.

The Brick and Toms River school districts have been vocal in their opposition to the bill, which would result in cuts of $42 million combined over seven years. But they are far from alone, and on Tuesday representatives of 34 other districts affected by the Sweeney proposal joined them in calling for state legislators to take another look, according to a joint news release from the coalition of school districts.

The key contention: the formula used to determine state education funding is severely flawed, and has been for quite some time. Components such as wealth and income are not calculated fairly; the formula fails to take into consideration PILOTs (payments in lieu of taxes, paid by developers to towns instead of property taxes); and more than 30 towns have not had property revaluations -- a key facet in determining need -- in more than 25 years.

Jeffrey Bennett, of the Fair Funding Action Committee, a group backing the Sweeney bill, says the complaints about the revaluations are inaccurate and that county tax assessors compensate for that in an equalized valuation figure that looks at recent property sales to gauge valuation. He also contents the PILOT issue is overstated.

The Sweeney bill, S2, would reduce adjustment aid 5 percent for the 2018-19 school year, and reductions of 8 percent in 2019-2020, 10 percent, 14 percent, 18 percent, and 21 percent, with the last portion being cut in the 2024-25 school year.

The bill is the second attempt by Sweeney to cut the aid; last summer, a budget deal between Sweeney, then-Assembly Speaker Vincent Prieto and then-Gov. Chris Christie led to cuts to that aid — more than $1.4 million in Toms River and $720,000 in Brick. Those funds were later restored by the state Department of Education.

Under S2, in districts losing aid where school spending is under adequacy — meaning it is less than what the state formula says should be spent to provide a "thorough and efficient education" as defined by the state constititution — the Sweeney bill would require those districts to raise the property tax levy yearly by 2 percent to compensate for the lost aid. According to Sweeney, the funding formula says those districts are not paying their fair share of property taxes.

"We’re in the Pinelands," said Southampton Township School District Business Administrator Barbara Godfrey, one of the districts that joined the coalition. "There’s no growth opportunity for us to increase our student base, so this falls on our taxpayer sand residents."

Also represented at the meeting in Brick were Freehold Regional; Southampton; Millville; Hazlet; Lavalette; Weymouth; Vineland; Delaware ValleyRegional; Frankford; Evesham; Clearview; Logan Township; Lacey; Pitman; Shamong; Medford; Burlington City; Dennis Township; Upper Township; Lumberton; Middle Township; Wildwood; Tinton Falls; Point Pleasant; Ocean Township; Clinton; Little Egg Harbor; Manalapan-Englishtown Regional; Manchester; Jackson; Pinelands; Plumstead; Stanhope, and Middletown Township.

"The formula’s flaws seem evident in the volume and diversity of the affected districts in attendance,which were big and small, rural and suburban, and represented populations of varying economic need," the coalition said.

"Those 34 school districts represent 13 legislative districts, which accounts for one-third of all legislative districts in NJ. Even school districts that could not attend, such as Eagleswood, reached out to express their support of and inclusion in the coalition," the release said. They represent more than 2 million voters combined, the coalition said.

The coalition noted that Gov. Phil Murphy, in his March 13 budget address, said the funding formula needs to be modernized.

"I ask you to work with me to make these changes so we can reach this goal of full, fair funding by the 2021-2022 school year. Together, we can fulfill the promises made a decade ago while ensuring that our dollars are spent according to the needs of students and districts today," Murphy said in his address to the state legislature.

With reporting by Karen Wall