Neighbor News
Andy Kim Under Fire for Taking Donation from Union-Busting CEO
Congressman's Senate Campaign Brews Trouble with Java Money from Ex-Starbucks Boss!

With the Democratic primary election for the US Senate nomination in New Jersey drawing near, contrasting records have emerged between the two leading contenders: civil rights champion Lawrence "Larry" Hamm and Congressman Andy Kim.
Recent revelations regarding campaign contributions have put Kim under intense scrutiny. Federal Election Commission records show that the corporation-loving Congressman accepted a $2000 donation from former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, known for the aggressive anti-union tactics the company used against workers' rights.
The greedy billionaire's money has ignited criticism from progressive Democrats and raised ethical questions about Kim's alignment with corporate interests over workers' welfare.
Find out what's happening in Teaneckfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
In stark contrast, Larry Hamm has positioned himself as a staunch advocate for working families and equitable economic policies.
Hamm supports raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour and advocating for higher wages, salaries, and a living wage for all Americans. His platform emphasizes the importance of addressing income inequality and promoting policies that uplift the most vulnerable members of society.
Find out what's happening in Teaneckfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
"The acceptance of contributions from Howard Schultz, who has a history of violating federal labor laws and engaging in anti-union practices, has called into question Kim's commitment to supporting working-class Americans," said Brian Lang, a member of Starbucks Workers United (SBWU). "Schultz's contentious actions, including illegal firings and anti-union retaliation, stand in direct opposition to the values that real Democrats stand for."

Baristas in Miami recently became the 400th store to join Starbucks Workers United, pushing the total number of workers at union stores to over 10,000.
Workers United and Starbucks announced an agreement to achieve collective bargaining agreements for represented stores and partners; the resolution of litigation between the union and the company, including brand litigation; and a fair process for workers to organize after Schultz ended his third stint as head of the coffee chain by stepping down as interim chief executive about one year ago.
Lisa McCormick, a progressive Democrat whose grassroots support in the 2018 primary stunned observers, expressed dismay over Kim's acceptance of financial support from Schultz.
"It is deeply troubling to see Andy Kim accepting financial support from Howard Schultz, the poster boy for corporate anti-labor practices in America," said McCormick. "By aligning himself with union-busting Schultz, Andy Kim sends a clear message that he is willing to prioritize the interests of corporate elites over the rights and well-being of workers."
"Since the first Starbucks store formed a labor union, Howard Schultz aggressively fought against his own workers, using illegal anti-union tactics to intimidate and punish employees for organizing. In response, Workers United has filed around 180 Unfair Labor Practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board, where Andy Kim's campaign contributor lost," said McCormick.
"Taking this contribution from Howard Schultz raises serious concerns about Andy Kim's allegiances," said McCormick. "Democrats for Change is calling on Andy Kim to acknowledge the donation and explain why he is supported by someone synonmous with corporate exploitation and abuse against working people."
While Kim's campaign has come under fire for its association with corporate interests, Hamm has remained steadfast in his commitment to advancing policies that empower working families and promote economic justice.
Hamm's candidacy represents a genuine grassroots movement aimed at challenging the status quo and advocating for progressive change.
As the June 4 Democratic primary election approaches, voters in New Jersey face a critical decision. Will they choose a candidate aligned with corporate interests and the status quo, or will they embrace a champion for progressive values and working-class Americans? The choice is theirs to make.