Community Corner
Contractor Questions Trustees' Ethics Over Bidding Process
The contract to remove sand from Georgica Pond hasn't yet been awarded to anyone.

A dispute broke out at the meeting when Montauk excavation contractor Keith Grimes questioned the board's ethics after he was not awarded a bid he believes he deserved to get.
Grimes, who has been working to shore up the , had put in a bid to pay $66,000 for sand from Georgica Pond, which the board sells. Although Grimesβ offer was lower than the offer of Patrick Bistrian the board had originally decided to go with Grimes because they were in a hurry to get it done, and at the time it seemed like Bistrian was negotiating.
βPatrick Bistrian said he would pay us $77,000, but it seemed like it wasnβt a solid offer, and we were in a hurry to get it done, so we went with Keith Grimes,β said John Courtney, attorney to the trustees. Then the Bistrians criticized the boardβs process, and Courtney advised the board should look into the matter further and not do anything.
Find out what's happening in East Hamptonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Trustee chairwoman McNally had told Grimes that the board was researching their legal rights and decided not to give the contract to anyone. Courtney said he decided to put it off until October 2011 instead of January.
At Tuesday nightβs meeting, Grimes questioned the boardβs ethics, saying, βI didnβt want to call the ethics board because thereβs people on this board I respect, and I know their families. But Iβm leaving tonight not sure if what Iβve been told is factual. I think itβs unethical and quite possibly illegal.β
Find out what's happening in East Hamptonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
But Courtney said later, βI donβt blame Keith for being angry, but we may have jumped in too fast and we decided to wait until we get more information so this is done in a legally correct manner.β
Trustee John Gosman said he also understood Grimesβ anger. βHis bid was the only one that guaranteed the removal of the sand,β he said.
Courtney added, βIf we didnβt award it to anyone, how could it be illegal? My job is to protect the trustees, and thatβs what I did.β
McNally said she thought the problem was mostly anger, and that βthe ethics question is not justified.β
Talmage said the whole board only thinks of the environment and whatβs best for it. "Out intent is always the sameβin 2008 and 2009 we handled it the same wayβone year Bistrian and the next year Grimesβitβs unfortunate theyβre both upset,β she said.
In other matters, the board heard the .
The board is working on their Winter Flounder Project, to raise baby fluke and release them into the wild, near the old fish factory in Napeague. They are doing this in an effort to replenish the stocks.
The board also discussed the Hands Creek Water Testing project, where they are taking water samples from shellfish areas the DEC has closed, to test for things such as chloroform bacteria. This research will help determine the cause of shellfish problems.