Equality of Earnings-12th AD NYS Assembly Race-the Full Story

As the new Cabinet takes office in the White House Effective January 2021; implementation of Equality of Earnings for Women must finally resonate within NYS.

Women have now achieved securing the 2nd most influential seat; Vice President of the United States; but NYS, we are still lagging behind in Equality of Earnings Rules. The New Elect; Vice President Harris becoming the First Woman to hold the office of Vice President is a blessing for women as the U.S. Supreme Court is now predominately held in Conservative Tones. Women are completely liberated -until we sit back and see that retroactive earnings is not in effect in NYS. Retroactive Employment Bill Languages/laws must be enacted to correct injustices noted by the Executive Branch in NYS (The Governor) which that implementation will ensure that Women in present day time are Equal in their earning Power. Women, We have the Power to do great things in our lives-this is not the problem-being paid equally for it is the issue. 100 years later-we're still lagging on this matter in the greatest democracy of the world.

Inequality of earnings issue remains still woven in context-that Women'sEarnings present day and prior provided have been less then adequate in many industries and in the Professional Arenas; Women have taken on Leadership Professional Titles primarily in the Public Sector have often; accepted Employment Contracts where their Talents were not completely paid for.

The Implementation of the NYS Maltese-Equality of Earnings Law Enactment will set the process women need where New York State "acknowledged" wrong doing in issuance of Employment Contracts and do right by it! Nine times out of ten; Men-in similar employment roles or same employment duty do not wait for retroactive earnings for close to a decade to be corrected when a valid employment claim exists-or in present day employment contracts signed-men do not feel the pressure to say; "yes-to mediocre employment contracts before them". Without the Public Sector and/or the Private Sector being required to offer Employment Guidance (when the contract is within the possession of their employee) Women are accepting Employment terms often providing "non-standard Employment wages or benefits" for their contractual work. That process needs to end as it has permitted inequality within the Labor-Employment Arena. Once Women have Equality of Earnings and a Process to follow up on when it didn't exist-then we are well advised and can make employment decisions soundly that resonates the best Employment Contract for their employment services. Women are Decision Makers in the employment arena- but even with this acknowledgement; mediocre earnings standards are being permitted still-by not explaining employment aspects-but we are asked to "sign"-that signature formulates the contractual agreement terms not always in the best interest of the employee.

NYS is the Largest At-Will Employer in the State of New York and it's Executive Branch-the office of the Governor, acknowledged this issue and promised Women Employees of NYS-in 2014-as well as through 2017-He would ensure to make Good on our Employment Discrepancies and Ensure that those of us entitled to retroactive earnings-would receive out earnings. It's time for NYS to implement the claims processes so that Women who are entitled to retroactive Employment Earnings; where the Promise was made to do so- receive their retroactive employment earnings.

As a former Regional Communications Manager for the NYS Legislature (Senate and Assembly)-which included heavy concentration of Legislative Actions; I Have outlined-a way in which NYS should implement the process. I have 18.5 years Managing Elected's agendas; I've worked on numerous constituent cases where holes in existing Legislation has permitted injustices and the 19th Amendment present protections did not include legislative languages requiring States (NYS) to implement timely retroactive language. I also made this part of my legislation agenda during my election run for the 12th NYS Assembly Race. NYS needs to now move on the Legislation-so that the present injustice is finalized-and the younger generation of women moving up the rank of employment can have the tools they need to ask questions before they sign Employment Contracts. The implementation of the Process will proactively institute other Women's Equality Concerns as Equality of Earnings and Women's Right of Choice are One Vote in New York State. The Younger Generation of Women entering the workforce in decision making capacity can not have full equality until matters of preexisting wage inequality is finalized. Who are we kidding?!

In Suffolk County; several Legislators or Members who have held State Legislative Seats; have voted; 'No"-on the Women's Agenda Movement and the concentration of these seats are in the Townships of Huntington, Babylon and West Islip for over 40 years. Women have only had the right to vote and be recognized as humans-and in the workforce for 100 years-I have been working in the Legislative Processes for 33 of them-either as a Public State Officer-Legislative or as a Campaign Manager for State and Federal Candidates. By not implementing Equality of Earnings Processes this 100th Year of our Right to Vote sent the message exactly where women stand in New York State. This Action in Suffolk County-Sends the message to women who live here; Those who do no support our Rights- decide your Faith-of employment and equality of earnings is not a County Priority. That's the wrong message to be sending to women in Suffolk County by the Legislators who represent them. This mentality is within the present NYS 12th Assembly District, Senate Seats 2nd and 5th districts. Unity within Society can only be achieved when States and Counties implement Equality of Employment Contracts and retroactive earnings for Women. This is why NYS needs to full-fill their promise of Implementing the Legislative Bill Languages to fill in the holes of injustice for women in the employment sectors.

As mentioned in the Patch previously; I was denied Access to the NYS Election Ballot this Year-2020 (12th AD race); not because I didn't file the Court Forms Correct; but because as a Woman-educating other Women on New York State's Budget Process (One Vote-Earnings and Choice interwoven) pushed Women to think about what is at stake for us and the Leadership holding on to Statewide Legislative Seats crushed down their viewpoints-by not permitting me introduction at Party Nomination Meetings. Who gets away with that in 2020-when it's required by Robert's Rules of Order and the candidate was invited to the Nominating Meeting? No-one-this will be dealt with-the Democratic Party Suffolk County Chairmanship or Chairwomanship is a Paid Employment Role-thus far paying the Person who sits in the Chair @ least $120,000 per year-it's not a voluntary position. Rick Shaffer-happens to also be Babylon Supervisor-where he is also earning additional income and has a private law practice. I'm a State Inactive Staff Member-do we see any issues Power in the Nomination Meeting Room? In my 33 years of Campaign Management I have never witnessed a local Political Party not introduce a candidate or permit them 3-5 minutes of time required by Robert Rules of Order; when the Chair asked Candidates for their resumes and invited them to the Nomination Roll Call Vote Meeting. That was February 15, 2020-Covid Pandemic 19 State of Emergency Orders were not implemented yet-and this meeting was scheduled directly for it.

Once I was denied by NYS Board of Elections (Suffolk Chapter) to be on the ballot for NYS 12th AD-a candidate has the right to ask Judicial to review the Agencies decision as changes in Election Law Scheduled-the Political Calendar for NYS changed due to Pandemic State or Emergency. Just because the Political Calendaring changed-does not give NYS permission to eliminate State Candidate requirements to get on the ballot-this was the central point of my complaint. NYS does have permission to stop clock petitioning under way as it commenced on February 25, 2020-and restart the clock as NYS did when 9-11 Terror Attacks Halted State Elections (which I ran) for 2.5 weeks. 9-11 is the precedent for NYS to Stop-Clock Petitioning-and re-start it; but by the EO 202.2 of March 7-reducing my time to petition is unconstitutional. In NYS; a Petitioner not running with the Political Party-has 37 days to gather and witness signatures-which is a MUST and can not be done by absentee ballot. 9-11 State of Emergency Orders-granted every election that year as well additional time-extended time to get on the ballot-another central point filed in my Complaint with Suffolk Supreme-and my right to be Heard was negated as a Female Petitioner without Counsel. What does this tell women of Suffolk? How many of us responded on 9-11 to NYC 9-11 call?-did we say then; It's ok Maryann-I'm going to eliminate you from the Election Process-opportunity to Ballot-but give every other race in NYS-extended time frames to do so? Did anyone's Election scheduled on 9-11; the aftermath-not have State Permission for their election to re-scheduled-and all petitioners (myself) granted the extended time frames of compliance? No-that never happened in 9-11 aftermath elections called 2.5 weeks into November of that year-but it did occur-this Election Cycle and there are no incumbents involved. Incumbents do no own seats-but they are offered courtesy as one who has hopefully represented the people while in office. Another-Lynching to Maltese for challenging the Leadership during what a State of Emergency Order?! "Like it's Hard?"-Elle Woods.

I have worked multiple State of Emergency Order Time Periods within the NYS Legislature; 9-11 was the hardest one-I showed up at work on 9-12-did you? I also showed up to work at every other State of Emergency while in State Service-HIV-AIDS Pandemic, H1N1, Hurricane Sandy to name a few solid State of Emergencies where patience and care provided to constituencies represented. As a woman Public Officer who had 2 children during my State Service-I worked until both were born within days of delivery; and reported back to work within 4-6 weeks of delivery; NYS owes me my retroactive earnings as I have held and carried the sentiment with me-the Public Officers Oath within my core. Fellow Public Officers on duty or off-we understand each other. So to be denied an Election Law Hearing by Suffolk Supreme and forward-is what? What do you say? I say a lot-but how does the community interpret it is what I'd love to hear as we have been disenfranchised from being within 6 feet of each other-and you might not have my phone number to include me in virtual discussions. A little humor as we proceed.

As every Election Seat in NYS was rescheduled-receiving extended Political Schedule Calendaring-then why was the 12th NYS Assembly Seat-not included in Extended Times frames offered by EO 202.2 of March 7, 2020? My Suffolk Supreme Court case; Maryann Maltese v. Hon Andrew Cuomo and NYS Board of Elections 2020-01568-was denied to be Heard by Judicial. The index numbers are still open for consideration-do we have an attorney around looking to do good public work? Another political process that has never transpired in the State of New York at the start gate of Election Law Processes. What does this say about Women's Rights in Suffolk County-you must see it from this Mind Set and not a metropolitan city view point. I was born in Queens-so I understand different mind sets of the State of New York-and I have roots here in Huntington-just like the other 2 non-incumbent candidates for 20 years.

In my 33 years of Election Law Campaign Experiences throughout NYS; I have never witnessed such resistance in an Election Law Proceeding and Suffolk Supreme Court denial of a Virtual Hearing of my Court challenge above at the Start Gate of Judicial Review sets the tone as to Suffolk pulling rank on jurisdictional magnitude of who received Equal time at Court-or Access to the Court and who did not. Why? My Election Law Complaint-did not point personal fingers at challenging candidates if signatures of petitions are presently alive or dead or registered in the district (Child's Play Political Games-Chuckie Doll Series-not quite Toy Story); but asked for relief of deeper Constitutional violations on Federal and State rules pertaining to Non-Political Party endorsed (public citizen) access to the ballot. As the non-political party chosen candidate this Legislative Season-denial of protections provided by Article 6 were violated by NYS. The March 7, 2020-State of Emergency (Sections on Election Law-please people and Suffolk Supreme Note this already) granted every single Election district extended time to petition for access to the ballot-except for the 12th NYS Assembly District. Say...what?! I say that court action is singling out this district and there is no-incumbent to even provide courtesy too. That is discriminatory-once again denying women the ability to be the elected here in the 12th AD for 40 years.

Friends and Voters of the 12th AD-The reason why I filed; Maryann Maltese v. Governor Andrew Cuomo and NYS Board of Elections 2020-01568-which challenged the Merits of EO 202 of March 7; asking Suffolk Supreme Court to provide judicial relief as every single election district in NYS and School Board Elections were provided extended time frames for election processes-except the 12th Assembly District-is because Women were disenfranchised for the 12th AD seat-once again-and as a Female with Experiences and non-factually based press coverage of the issues-was prominent. This isn't a Game-it's a profession for me and not earning a livelihood isn't recommended by anyone.

After Filing motion upon motion (I paid for) the Court finally approved me for a Poor Person Judgement (PPJ) that I could proceed with no-fee based court fees for the Court to consider the constitutionality within my complaint (without assigned Counsel)-resulting and promoting that only Candidates with Counsel Election Law cases were heard in Suffolk County; as well as that only Wealthy or Politically Funded Candidates have access to the ballot. I set up a Campaign Account for online usage and for direct mailings-Campaigns cost money even the best candidates need to pay for Mailers (whether they are glossy or not) and postage to do so. Candidates need gas money to get to their destinations-this is way Campaign accounts are established so that we legally can document and write off expenses incurred. No candidate who had accounts for proper campaign donations to be forwarded should be denied access by Red Win or ACT Blue-two Major Financial Institutions which are chartered to keep a check on monies received-spent.

Additionally the 2nd Judicial Appellate-agreed to hear case, agreed that I'm a Poor Person (great I'm a State Staff Member-they got that right)-but rendered I would be required to cover all Legal expenses. I filed Motion to proceed without Counsel-denied-as the Courts wanted their Clerk fees to proceed-again-stressing the point that only Wealthy Candidates are Able to Run for Offices in Suffolk County. That is discriminatory in it's entirety-negating the private citizen or Non-Political Party Endorsed Candidate access to the ballot.

The actions above speaks volumes of how Women have been treated here in Suffolk County for 40 years as the former NYS Assembly Member representing the 12th voted against Women's Equality and the Present winner (Brown)-doesn't either. How convenient; that Suffolk County Republicans paid for Polenz v. Marcantonio 2020-01569 to he Heard-which it was-an Election Law Case-determining that Virtual Hearings during Pandemic are permitted-I thought it was a Must?! No-but Denied Maltese 2020-01568-the same aspects of a Court Hearing! That is Prejudical and stresses in so many ways were Women stand in the County first of all-2nd! and rendered that only Political Party Endorsed Candidates are entitled to safe Petitioning Efforts during State of Emergency Order do no gather do not petition. The Court's did not want to exam if Citizen Participation within the Election Processes was invalidated.

My Complaint filed with both Courts also included asking the Court to provide me with relief for the reasons mentioned above; and as my rights were violated; to place me on the ballot and/or extend time frame to do so because the Eo 202.2 of March 7, 2020-eliminated Independent Petitioning in its entirety which is a violation of Article 6-independent petitioning in this manner means access point for non-political party candidates-it does not mean those who were endorsed by the Independence Political Party (Was there a Meeting? -I didn't receive an invite to send my resume to.

Independent petitioning under NYS Election Rules was to begin on April 14, 2020-it was never extended-it's required to be. All of these complaints I provided in seeking Court-Judicial relief to access the Ballot for the 12th AD-were denied to be reviewed by Judicial. What does that tell us about where women's issues and cases pertaining to our rights in general stand-if a woman of Process is denied a Hearing after her State Public Service Provided Honorably? To Me-it sent the Message that a Lynching by State Supreme (Peers for Justice) for Standing up what we in Public Service declare every day for Non-Staff Women.

Read below and understand a further back drop...while seeking Elective Office....

I have not been quiet or silenced on my plight to ensure that Women receive our retroactive earnings for work performances provided-pushing the Legislature to make good on Mine and your Earnings not granted, and I have been silenced by Governor Cuomo in my personal plea. As an inactive staff member-which means I'm not presently in state service-I can absolutely advocate and lobby for any entity. Interesting-I sent a Lobbyist Application to NYS DOS in 2016-3 years after my service was completed as Public Officers are required to wait 1 or 2 years before they can be permitted to be Lobbyists-my application was mailed back to me! Why?

Then; separately silenced at Suffolk Supreme Court-denial of a Hearing on a Civil Matter-Election Law. That is unheard of from my prospective as I'm a Professional Woman of Legislative Process; my entire professional career in good standing behind me-and I'm denied an Election Law Hearing?! The Court's decision smells and reeks of discrimination at its best-why wouldn't the Challenge be heard? Women of Suffolk need to ask this question regardless of your skin color. This isn't a battle of the sexes on a TV show; where each of us walks away with a consolation prize behind Curtain 1 or Curtain 2-it's not the kind of Athletic Sporting event like the World Series where each team walks away with a Championship Ring and Cash Prizes. Legislators or those that seek legislative offices (elected's) we place our entire life on the line-and when we're denied Judicial Processes-that screams volumes.

Maltese Election Law Matter Court case is about ensuring Women have equal access to the Judicial-which did not occur; Separately; NYS as my Former Employer-is in arrears to me of my outstanding Employment Claim-and thus I have been advocating for Earnings Processes to be Implemented for those of us entitled; and those Women Employed but received unfair or unequal employment contracts receive retroactive earnings due.

My Campaign Platform included this every day-and I did not hide from the reality that NYS is in Employment Violation with Our Own!

As I'm a former Employee of New York State there fundamentally is no justifiable reason why; I, to be declined from a Virtual Hearing-even if one is considered a Peer! There's no contamination aspects to deal with-and no fear of physical retaliation in the courtroom. I don't find it a joke-the decision to "pick and choose" who Suffolk Supreme determined to offer an Election Hearing too this year and those involved with the 7 other Political Parties-should take notice of how you operate as Political Parties in NYS. Suffolk Determined who to provide a hearing too and who they did not provide Hearing too- that Legal Court Action-does render how Women are under represented within Judicial in Suffolk County and how women in their private-civilian lives are still required to be due diligent on how we carry ourselves. Has any checked out the Singing Naked Cowboy Lately in NYC-Broadway is closed-but those actors-actresses have permits to perform there? Do we see women in similar attire issued permits to do the same thing anywhere outside (as in climate) in NYS? I would love an answer-then women get the picture where we stand in NYS.

Now- the Election law Proceeding I filed whereas all Court required paperwork was timely submitted-but denied a Hearing-demonstrates injustice and discrimination at magnitude level. I appreciate the New Administration-Vice President Elect Harris asking for Unity-that's not possible until VP Harris recognizes that Women need to be United in our front and we are not permitted to divid ourselves any further within races-by doing that-Women are cracking the unity. I managed Grace Meng's Bid to Congress-do not insult me with Press releases on singling out different groups of women as a way of promoting one of us over the others. That's how Men want us to act.

The Maltese Equality -Retroactive Earning Law in NYS must be implemented 2020 (NOW). That's when Unity happens when Justice transpires-especially for earnings provided and due compensation finalized. Cowardly political moves and Fear of change pushes Judicial Branches to deny One a Hearing. Election Law is not criminal law; so no one has the right to a Hearing or to an Attorney-but it does resonate how Clerk's offices within Suffolk Supreme determine when to accept Court papers and when they Choose not to. 2nd Judicial acknowledging we're all poor litigants that's great-but denying a State Employee with Tenure access to the what they rendered (PPJ) is absurd-and discriminatory. Did I mention I have an outstanding Employment claim? That's a called a lynching people-or strangling-no pun intended-and thankfully my mental health is stronger than most.

As a Highly respected Women within Process-I never would have anticipated that I would be denied an Election Law Hearing-which is simply asking for Judicial Review. I financially paid for the Election Law Process; not special interest groups-but why aren't we permitting those not presently earning wages access to the Ballot? No where in the U.S. Constitution or NYS Constitution does it declare that one can not be without present wages to run for elective offices in NYS or for the Federal Government. Then many should ask-why did the 2nd Judicial deny my Poor Person Judgement so that I would not be required to pay for additional Motions to be submitted? Good Question-the Court doesn't have an answer-but perhaps additional Court cases filed suing NYS sets the example-to be determined.

Based on the above-and I understand it can be clouded-stay with me; If Women aren't receiving Review when Filing Employment claims or Court forms at the Start Gate (the Courts Clerks offices at the Court House)-then how can we assume-women understand or received wage fairness upon signing Employment Contracts within NYS? Thus-NYS 2017 acknowledgement-as the Largest Employer of NYS-in not providing "Equal Employment Contracts" Law must be implemented immediately. NYS's self sovereign reign of Employment Terror for women- That's a great slogan-courtesy of Maltese-by sitting back not issuing retroactive employment earnings to those of us (myself included) their rightful earnings-placed a huge barrier in mine or any other Female Public Officer's daily lives. If your employment Claim has not been settled yet with NYS-then-here we are (Not on the Ballot) Counsel isn't provided for Election Matters for Free. No one is entitled to Free Legal Service in Civil Matters-it's Court appointed.

If Suffolk County Supreme denies one who filed civil court challenges "a Poor Person Judgement" (Pro Sei) then the premise for Courts in rendering PPJ holds no value-no consideration in Maltese Election Law Case and is a Violation of Equal Rights Amendment; and by doing so- granting PPJ which was ineffective- the Claimant was discriminated against and denied rightful access to Judicial procedure by 2nd Judicial in Maltese v. Hon Cuomo and NYS Board of Elections. A question for both Suffolk Supreme and the 2nd Appellate-What is there to be afraid of? These Courts are the Power base-I'm a Claimant-how can I hurt the Court?! Why would I hurt the Court-to lose my upcoming State Pension?! DUH-But for the Clerks at these offices not to offer information-be concise of processing during Pandemic on Practical Filing aspects of submitting forms and tossing hands up in the air-"I can't give you legal advice"-is incorrect employment role. I didn't ask each clerk for your legal opinion-I asked which Court Forms need to be submitted as we proceed-that's not legal guidance-its a piece of blank paper.

Poor Person Judgement Approval by Civil or Supreme Court helps the indigent litigant cover costs of a civil trial (as again-the Court Can decide-whom is worthy and who is not) then Implementation of the Equality of Earnings Law within NYS must be implemented IMMEDIATELY so that Women-don't become dependent of social service programs to cover their legal expenses. It smells of injustice.

That was the message by Suffolk Supreme Court and 2nd Judicial in denying Maltese v. NYS Board of Elections and NYS Board of Elections-a Hearing-but Granted Polenz and Marcantonio-A Hearing. Denying A female hearing-is the Mark of pushing us back to feudal time period of Judicial extreme. If one is not earning wages during Pandemic-why wouldn't the court accept the PPJ and move forward on the case? Discrimination is the answer.

It wasn't that I'm not Professional Enough to be a Candidate; it wasn't I'm not educated enough to be a Candidate-denial began from the beginning by the Suffolk County Democratic Party Chairman choosing to use his executive privilege to NOT INTRODUCE ME at their Voting Meeting in February 2020 and spearheaded from there. If the daily Media-like Newsday, Associated Press, does not provide all Candidates equal access to being published in an Announced Election Process when Press releases are provided-contact made-Media is not covering the full story or factual aspects of every election-isn't Newsday a daily Long Island Publication?

While covering Election Processes and while Maltese V. Cuomo and NYS Board of Elections Court filings are current-ask yourselves as Voters-why wasn't fairness in journalism provided?

As stated above online political fundraising organizations RED WIN and ACT BLUE are not owned by the National Charters of either the Republican or Democratic Parties-but they do pick and choose who to eliminate from having fundraising accounts. Candidates are permitted to fundraise all year long-why ACT BLUE used the excuse they could not keep my online account open is violation of State Election Campaign Account Laws-and is violation of Banking Law Processes discriminating who is allowed to maintain their online campaign accounts and who an not.

These Political Parties do not own RED WIN or ACT BLUE online fundraising services which are chartered to support campaign candidates so that we are fundraising lawfully and ethically. By these two Financial Organizations deciding to permit which candidates can have an account and which ones can't-they have denied access violation of business law as any one who applies for an online campaign account must be registered with Board of Elections to run for office-which I am.
Sealing the deal of retaliation tactics is Suffolk Supreme denying me access to the Courtroom-a Hearing-but graciously believing in their rendering me approval on Being a Poor Person Judgement during Pandemic as this Court can pick and choose "who's case they wanted to render decisions on and who they do not".

By the 2nd Appellate acknowledging Suffolk County's decision-granting a Fellow Public Servant as one who is a poor person, but that all legal costs I would be required to pay out of pocket (again-aspects of fundraising were denied)-the 2nd Appellate rubber stamped Suffolk Supreme's decision that One needs to Pay for Legal Representation within an Election Law Matter to Represent voters within Suffolk County-one must be wealthy if ACT Blue or RED WIN turns off the access connection points for Candidates to fundraise.

As a former NYS Public Servant-these actions endured by private citizen (of which I presently am) reeks of injustice and it certainly renders where Suffolk County see's women's accomplishments within the Legislative Processes-at the bottom of the Long Island Sound. Did I mention that during my Campaign efforts and not for a fee-sent correspondence to NYSDEC asking if Flushing Tunnels or Mechanisms that flow the water have been installed behind LIPA Northport as that is usually an accepted DEC aspect? Yes-I know I did-it's here on the Patch on my Facebook. Did either candidate question other forms of environmentally sound ways to see if LIPA has these noted Installs? No-Maltese asked for it and is denied access by Suffolk Supreme Court-Why? Is really what Suffolk Voters should be asking NYS Board of Elections and Governor Cuomo.

I guess because I didn't charge Township of Huntington, $40,000 as the Attorney on Record to provide Lobbying Services wasn't considered an In-Kind donation? Oh did we learn that Councilman Smythe introduced resolution in Huntington to eliminate State Legislative Hires as of August 2020 from Healthcare Benefit Packages-the CSEA believes that is awesome. Call them to inquire.

The end result- women are not being treated as Equals in Suffolk County.

Women-are not as Frail as one in Suffolk May like to believe-but, it sure does render where we stand when we speak out on being denied Access to Judicial, Law Libraries are closed at the Judicial to provide information that Clerk offices do not want to provide (and when speaking with them imply "I can not offer you legal advice"-I thought I was asking for Clerk office procedural aspects to ensure that I administratively file these forms correct! No?!). that is not legal advice in NYS-if it is-show me please

Isn't what I described above - what we do at the District office level-or is your office looking at my voter registration every day to decide whether or not you'll offer me constituent guidance?

By denying me a Hearing- it encourages these intolerable actions in Suffolk-it's restrictive abusive at best-supporting discrimination measures perpetrated on women-on the end of Judicial. The 19th Amendment doesn't define Women as a Class by the Color of our skin-but-NYS this year; defined it as such! Demonstrating still we have differences-and cause of strifes between the races. As women-I have a number of multi-racial friendships and family relationships-I'm not a racist-however this situation has sparked unacceptable services. Those of us who share in multi-racial relationships-professional or personal we don't see each other as different-but the actions this Election Season in Suffolk defined it as something different. Let's hope statistics are taken to determine which Race of Women in Suffolk receives justice-and who doesn't-then we'll have factual guidance. That's what they're looking for-to propaganda it again-to create hateful atmospheres.

Equality of Earnings define when Women Are Equal-as those of us who have Earned, but did not receive our full earnings paid before this Presidential Election-rendered the Choices of Candidates by Executive Branches and those Elected's before you in Statewide offices-12th AD. Implementation of mine and anyone else's long over-due wages -0r prior earnings-must be enacted now-not next Legislative Session for NYS-but in 2020-the Legislature can be called in to Special Session before 12-31-especially when Injustice is relevant. By postponing my earnings again-it only permits further abuses for Women within Suffolk-do you agree?

Please join me in calling upon Governor Cuomo and the two Legislative Branches-State Assembly and State Senate in the 2020 Legislature who still are in position until December 31, 2020-to implement Maltese Equality of Earnings Law for the Women of New York State. By doing this-women are taking control of their lives and destiny. Feel free to reach me at Maryann@cowharborrealty.com-if you prefer to remain confidential-love to hear your story.