Politics & Government

Coalition Fighting Buckingham Warehouse To Discuss Next Steps

Group to hold a special meeting to brief the community on "clear goals and next steps."

The February planning commission meeting drew a standing-room-only crowd.
The February planning commission meeting drew a standing-room-only crowd. (Stop the Buckingham Warehouse Coalition)

BUCKINGHAM, PA — A coalition fighting to stop plans for a 150,000-square-foot warehouse in Buckingham Township has scheduled a meeting to update the community on the project.

“We will be having a planning and discussion session,” announced Mike Bateman, the organizer of the Stop the Buckingham Warehouse Coalition. “At this meeting we will go over everything we have learned on this project thus far and work together to come up with clear goals and next steps.”

Bateman said before any formal next steps are taken and because this is a major community issue, “I want to be sure the entire community has an opportunity to input their thoughts and help with brainstorming.”

Find out what's happening in Doylestownfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The meeting takes place on Tuesday, March 12 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at the Bucks County Audubon Society, 2877 Creamery Rd., New Hope 18938.

Those planning to attend are asked to email nobuckinghamwarehouse@gmail.com

Find out what's happening in Doylestownfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

In February, the Buckingham Township Planning Commission tabled action on preliminary land development plans for the proposed warehouse.

The planners did not say when they would be resuming the discussion and taking a vote, but encouraged residents to watch the township's website for information.

A standing-room-only crowd greeted the planning commissioners in February as they considered plans for the 30-dock facility, which is proposed to be built on the DiGirolamo Tract bordered by Cold Spring Creamery Road, Burnt House Hill Road and Progress Meadow Drive.

The warehouse would be located on 25 acres on the east side of the property on Progress Meadow Drive. The remaining part of the property fronting on Cold Spring Creamery Road would be placed in a conservation easement and will continue to be farmed.

At times during the meeting, the discussion got emotional as residents spoke out against the land development plan, raising concern over traffic and noise from the 18-wheelers that would be rolling down their streets.

A warehouse is a permitted use in the P1-2 Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant, however, is asking the township for a number of waivers including from the installation of bicycle and pedestrian paths on Cold Spring Creamery Road and from widening or reconstructing streets that are an inadequate width or condition to meet township requirements.

If the waivers are granted, the money the developer would have paid for the required improvements would be directed to another off-site improvement agreed upon by the township and the developer.

The project is being proposed by J.G. Petrucci Company of Asbury Park, New Jersey, which was represented at the meeting by land development attorney Ed Murphy, engineer Greg Glitzer from Gilmore and Associates and Matt Hammond, a consultant with Traffic Planning and Design.

According to Glitzer the building would set back 1,095 feet from Cold Spring Creamery Road and would include two parking areas - one for trucks on the west side of the building and one for employees and visitors on the east side.

All truck traffic would enter and exit the site from Stony Lane and a new 2,000-foot roadway that would be built between the warehouse and Stony Lane. Employees and visitors would enter the warehouse site from a separate entrance at Progress Meadow Drive.

Hammond said the truck traffic would enter and exit the site by using a right-hand-only turning movement onto Stony Lane and a left-hand turning movement into the site. To access Route 611, the trucks would use Stony Lane, Landisville Road, Old Easton Road, and Research Way.

"We would be looking to force all the truck traffic out to that route, out to 611 providing signage and requiring the drivers accessing the facility to take that route back out to 611," said Hammond. "We feel that's the most appropriate and shortest route to get to 611 and not impact the larger residential areas."

Residents at the meeting weren't buying it. They said the truckers would use GPS, which they said will direct them down Cold Spring Creamery Road from Swamp Road (Route 313).

"They are going to come down Swamp, make a turn onto Cold Spring Creamery and then come down Stony," yelled out one woman. "Don't tell me their GPS is going to take them down by the Wawa. You tell me how that's going to work," she said.

"All of us - Church School Road, Cold Spring Creamery. We're all going to have to live with trucks all day long and all night long," another woman yelled out.

"There is no truck that is going to follow that route," said another resident.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.