Why Keep The Drinking Age at 21?

Talking about underage drinking with a broad and unknown audience causes this seasoned Prevention Specialist some concern.  As the Coordinator of the Tiverton and LC Prevention Coalitions, I can generally craft my prevention messages to fit the audience.  Here on the Patch, I am communicating with people coming from all different perspectives on underage drinking. Not being one to crave controversy, my first instinct is to play it safe and avoid potential disagreements. However, that would leave me with very little to write.  So… somewhat out of character I will take a risk and say: There is no such thing as “responsible” underage drinking.  The drinking age (age 21) often comes under debate by those who advocate lowering the drinking age (generally to age 18).   

There is a tremendous amount of research that supports keeping the drinking age at 21.  Much of the latest evidence in support of age 21 comes from medical and neuroscience research.  Even moderate consumption of alcohol affects the function of a variety of brain systems associated with emotion, learning, motivation and coordination. 

The Tiverton and Little Compton Prevention Coalitions take into consideration the varying perspectives regarding underage drinking (as well as drug and tobacco use) and attempts to provide information based on the best research and evidence available. Advocates that support the minimum legal age of 21 are not prohibitionists. However we know too well that alcohol abuse and addiction endangers lives, damages families, and hurts communities. Delaying the onset of alcohol use is critical in minimizing alcohol’s effect on the developing brain.

The Coalitions seek to support families and youth serving organizations in our communities; the work of the coalition promotes healthy decisions making and positive choices among youth.

Helpful info for families:  http://www.toosmarttostart.samhsa.gov/families/facts/brain.aspx