How Big Was The Megalodon? UCR Researcher Disputes Current Theory

RIVERSIDE, CA — A recent study by the University of California Riverside researchers has taken a bite out of what was known as the Megalodon, commonly thought of the largest shark in world history.

Findings by Phillip Sternes, a UCR organismal biologist and lead author on the study published this week, shared his group's conclusions which claim the leviathan only reached lengths of up to 65 feet.

Previous studies posited that the Megalodon would grow to over 70 feet in length. Megalodons swam the Earth roughly 15 to 3.6-million years ago and are often portrayed as super-sized monsters in films such as 2018's "The Meg."

While there is no dispute that they existed or that they were gigantic, Otodus megalodon are known only from their fossilized teeth and vertebrae, Sternes writes, there is limited fossil evidence from which to conclude the actual length of the average Megalodon, as a complete skeleton has not yet been discovered.

"The cartilage in shark bodies doesn't preserve well, so there are currently no scientific means to support or refute previous studies on O. megalodon body forms," Sternes wrote in his report.

Traditionally, researchers have modeled Megalodon bodies on modern great white sharks. Great whites are partially warm-blooded and belong to the lamniform shark order. Megalodons, who also belong to this order, shared this partial warm-bloodedness with great whites.

It was previously thought having some warm blood is an advantage that could expand sharks' swimming range, unlike other fish dependent on water temperature. Now, Sternes believes warm blood increases swimming speed.

"Great whites are among the fastest swimming sharks, so Megalodons were likely also big, fast sharks you would not want to run into in the open ocean," said Sternes.

There are eight families of Lamniformes and 15 species.

Previous research took five species of warm-blooded Lamniformes, averaged their fin and body shapes and proposed a general model for Megalodons.

Sternes and his colleagues wanted to understand whether the five species used to determine Megalodon's shape differed somehow from the rest of the order, including some cold-blooded sharks.

The researchers compared the five species to each other and the rest of the lamniform order. Using detailed field guide drawings, they performed quantitative comparisons of the sharks' fin, head and body shapes, as reported by UC Riverside.

They found no general patterns that would allow them to tease out body shape differences.

"Warm bloodedness does not make you a differently shaped shark," Sternes said. "I encourage others to explore ideas about its body shape and to search for the ultimate treasure of a preserved Megalodon fossil. Meanwhile, this result clears up some confusion about previous findings and opens the door to other ideas once again."

While others typically use actual organisms or photos of organisms for such comparisons, Sternes pioneered this two-dimensional drawing technique on sharks.

"The purpose of field guides is to identify a species, so the drawings must be accurate representations," he said. "It's a technique widely used in biology and works well for sharks since some specimens exist only in remote places."

Sternes hopes that others use the technique to study snakes, birds and other animals with specimens that may be difficult to collect. He also hopes others will continue to search for a better understanding of the Megalodon.

"This study may appear to be a step backward in science," said Kenshu Shimada, study co-author and DePaul University paleobiology professor. "But the continued mystery makes paleontology, the study of prehistoric life, a fascinating and exciting scientific field."

Sternes and his team used a pioneering technique for analyzing sharks published in the international journal Historical Biology.