Manson Family Killer Leslie Van Houten Should Be Paroled, Court Rules

LOS ANGELES, CA — A California appeals court said Tuesday that Leslie Van Houten, who participated in two killings at the direction of cult leader Charles Manson in 1969, should be let out of prison on parole.

The ruling could pave the way for her release, making her the first active participant in the infamous Manson Family Tate-LaBianca murders to be paroled from prison. Her co-killers either remain locked up with her or died in prison. The appellate ruling could yet be overturned if the state appeals to the California Supreme Court to intervene, as is widely expected. The murders remain among the most shocking in state history, and officials have repeatedly sought to block any effort to parole the Manson Family murderers.

The appellate court’s ruling reverses an earlier decision by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who rejected parole for Van Houten in 2020. She has been recommended for parole five times since 2016. All of those recommendations were rejected by either Newsom or former California Gov. Jerry Brown.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta could ask the California Supreme Court to stop her release. Neither his office nor Newsom's immediately responded to requests for comment on whether they would do so.

Van Houten, now in her 70s, is serving a life sentence for helping Manson and other followers kill Leno LaBianca, a grocer in Los Angeles, and his wife Rosemary. Van Houten was a 19-year-old former beauty queen at the time when she and other cult members stabbed to death the LaBiancas in August 1969. She has often been portrayed as the least culpable of the Manson killers, but her early efforts to minimize her role in the killings prompted criticism from the parole board for not taking responsibility for the murders.

Specifically, Van Houten along with Tex Watson and Patricia Krenwinkel went to the house of Rosemary and Leno LaBianca, and Van Houten helped to hold down and repeatedly stab Rosemary LaBianca, according to prosecutors. Van Houten said they carved up Leno LaBianca’s body and smeared the couple’s blood on the walls.

The slayings came the day after other Manson followers, not including Van Houten, killed pregnant actress Sharon Tate and four others in violence that spread fear across Los Angeles and captivated the nation.

At times Van Houten has claimed she only stabbed Rosemary LaBianca after she was already dead and that she participated in the killings because she was under the influence of drugs and of Manson. At other times, she has claimed full responsibility for killing Rosemary LaBianca.

Since then, Van Houten has been considered a model prisoner and amassed support from a following including celebrities such as director John Waters.

Prosecutors and family members of the Tate and LaBianca victims continue to oppose her release, contending the heinousness of the crimes are enough to merit life in prison. The Manson Family killers were originally sentenced to death, but their sentences were commuted when the state temporarily eliminated the death penalty in the 1970s.

Newsom has said that Van Houten still poses a danger to society. In rejecting her parole, he said she offered an inconsistent and inadequate explanation for her involvement with Manson at the time of the killings.

The Second District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles ruled 2-1 to reverse Newsom's decision, writing there is “no evidence to support the Governor's conclusions" about Van Houten's fitness for parole.

The judges took issue with Newsom’s claim that Van Houten did not adequately explain how she fell under Manson’s influence. At her parole hearings, she discussed at length how her parents' divorce, her drug and alcohol abuse, and a forced illegal abortion led her down a path that left her vulnerable to him.

They also argued against Newsom’s suggestion that her past violent acts were a cause for future concern were she to be released.

“Van Houten has shown extraordinary rehabilitative efforts, insight, remorse, realistic parole plans, support from family and friends, favorable institutional reports, and, at the time of the Governor’s decision, had received four successive grants of parole," the judges wrote. “Although the Governor states Van Houten’s historical factors ‘remain salient,’ he identifies nothing in the record indicating Van Houten has not successfully addressed those factors through many years of therapy, substance abuse programming, and other efforts.”

The dissenting judge argued that there was some evidence Van Houten lacked insight into the heinous killings, and agreed with Newsom that her petition to be released should be denied.

Nancy Tetreault, Van Houten’s attorney, said she expects Bonta to ask the state Supreme Court to review the lower court’s decision, a process that could take years.

In addition, Bonta will likely request a stay of the appellate court’s ruling, Tetreault said. The high court could order Van Houten's release while it decides on whether to grant the stay.

“I will, of course, vigorously oppose any stay,” Tetreault said. “And they could let her out during that process.”

Van Houten was found suitable for parole after a July 2020 hearing, but her release was blocked by Newsom. She filed an appeal with a trial court, which rejected it. She then sought her release through the appellate courts.

Van Houten remains incarcerated at the California Institution for Women along with Krenwinkel, a fellow LaBianca killer. Sharon Tate killer Susan Atkins died of cancer in the same prison more than a decade ago. Manson died in prison in 2017.

CHRISTOPHER WEBER and AMY TAXIN Associated Press, and Patch Staffer Paige Austin contributed to this report.