Community Corner
Contra Costa Public Workers Deliver 39K Signatures To Repeal Supervisors' Raise
The 32 percent salary increase felt "like a slap in the face," said one employee.

A recent vote by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to give themselves a 33 percent pay increase may not go into effect after all. A consortium of organizations representing public employees and tax payers teamed up today to deliver a petition calling for a referendum on the supervisorsโ raise, which was set to go into effect Sunday.
The salary adjustment would have increased the supervisorsโ salaries from $97,483 to $129,227.
Peter Nguyen, general manager of the Public Employees Union Local 1, which represents county employees, said the organization, along with the Deputy Sheriffโs Association, the Contra Costa Tax Payers Association, and chapters of American Federal, State County and Municipal Employees had collected 39,222 signatures.
Find out what's happening in Walnut Creekfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Previous:
The number is well above the 25,500 that county spokeswoman Betsy Burkhart said was needed for the board to reconsider their vote. But first, the signatures will be sent to the elections office for verification.
Find out what's happening in Walnut Creekfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
If the county clerk certifies the petition, Board of Supervisors Chairwoman Karen Mitchoff said the board would reconsider the pay raise, rather than authorizing a referendum on the issue.
โWhen we did this, we did not think there would be this response or this reaction,โ Mitchoff said. โPeople are angry and I get that theyโre angry. ... We thought it was a fair and equitable time to adjust salaries so they donโt continue to spiral away from the average.โ
Incoming Chairman John Gioia is calling for the board to act before the clerk is done verifying signatures. He said heโs prepared to submit a proposal on Jan. 13 stopping the expenditure of county funds for the clerk to verify signatures and then to ask the board to rescind the pay raise.
โThe board has a lot of incoming issues next year and we want to move past this issue,โ Gioia said, adding the board will then have to determine how to adjust their salaries in the future.
Outgoing Deputy Sheriffโs Association president Ken Westermann said he was โdumbfoundedโ when he first learned of the raise.
โFor years, the supervisors have been talking with us about shared sacrifices and that the countyโs financial situation was obviously very dismal, that revenue was down,โ Westermann said. โItโs very hypocritical.โ
Westermann said the sheriffโs office has lost 55 deputies to neighboring counties, roughly 9 percent of the force, because salaries are much lower in Contra Costa County than elsewhere in the Bay Area.
Robbie Ann White, president of AFSCME Local 2700, said the salary increase felt โlike a slap in the face,โ after a two-year contract negotiation for county employees.
โThey had told us in all the bargaining sessions they didnโt have the money and they would rather spend the money on wages instead of other things that would be incentives for our employees,โ White said.
She said a study of salaries in surrounding counties revealed Contra Costa County employees were receiving up to 19 percent less than the average salaries of similar employees.
Mitchoff said the supervisors were also getting paid less than supervisors across the state.
At their new salary of $129,000, Contra Costa County supervisors would still be paid roughly $18,000 less than supervisors in the more populous Alameda and Santa Clara counties, as well as Sonoma County, where the board earns $138,500 annually, according to county documents.
Supervisor Candice Anderson, who cast the sole dissenting vote when the salary ordinance was introduced on Oct. 28, said she felt it wasnโt fair for the supervisors to justify their own pay raise by comparing their salaries to other counties while telling county employees similar comparisons werenโt valid.
โTo take a raise well over 30 percent was shocking and (county employees) felt betrayed,โ Anderson said.
Anderson said she voted against the raise on principle, rather than because it would have been fiscally irresponsible.
With just five county supervisors, Mitchoff said the raise amounts to approximately $235,000, as opposed to the millions it would cost to raise county employee salaries by even 1 percent.
โFor me, you lead by example and you lead by sacrifice,โ Anderson said. โWe canโt offer our employees that raise.โ
Anderson said she included a waiver in the ordinance so that she would only receive a pay increase of 4 percent, the same that was received by the Public Employees Union Local 1 in their most recent contract.
Nguyen said the supervisors should tie their pay raises to the local consumer price index or the average wage increase of county employees, instead of 70 percent of superior court judgesโ salaries, as is currently the case.
โWe believe any wage adjustment should be reasonable,โ Nguyen said. โI hope (this referendum) reminds the board that their primary job is to serve the public and to engage with their constituents. If they had kept those two tenants in mind, they never would have gone down this path.โ
--Bay City News
--Image from Contra Costa County public employees unionsโ protest in November.
Also on Patch:
Is โTravel Moreโ On Your 2015 Resolution List? Here Is A Slew Of Ideas
Bay Area DJ Lets Us Relive 2014 With Top Song Remix
Sale Saturday at Friends Corner Book Shop In Lafayette
Lafayette Man Found Dead at Fraternity in Berkeley Died of Alcohol Poisoning
McCoveyโs In Walnut Creek Closing In February.
Famed Yountville Restaurant Says Stolen Wine Estimated At $300K.
Get Your Reluctant Reader to Pick Up a Book. Make a New Yearโs resolution to get your kids reading this year.
3.2-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes New Yearโs Day Near Kenwood.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.