State Releases New Teacher Evaluations, How Did Chatham Schools Do?

Accolade after accolade after accolade for the Chatham School District.

And now we see why.

Under a new teacher and administrator evaluation system in the state of New Jersey, educators in the 2013-14 were graded on a scale of four measures.

Results were released by the state Wednesday, and in Chatham, the question wasn’t whether local teachers performed or were ineffective, rather, how well they performed.

Teachers in each school were ranked on a four-level scale, from ineffective, to partially ineffective, to effective, to highly effective as part of the new AchieveNJ evaluation system.

Because the disclosure of evaluation data of any particular employee is, by law, completely confidential, discrepancies in the overall numbers will be seen. The Department of Education calls this its suppression rate, meaning it won’t release the figures of specific categories of educators. From the DOE, regarding suppression:

1. Records that have n-size < 10 are suppressed, e.g., if 9 or fewer staff received a rating of Ineffective, the record will be suppressed (the record will not be part of the data file). The total will always be displayed irrespective of n-size.

2. When one performance level is suppressed due to n-size, and all 4 performance level ratings are present, the next lowest staff count will be suppressed (record will not be part of the file), to disallow roll-up to find the rating count for the first level suppressed and thus potentially identify educators.

3. Records with 100% staff in one performance level are suppressed, as per state law (since in this case, any viewer would know each educator’s evaluation rating). In such cases, only the total staff count record will be provided as part of the data file.”

In the Chatham school district, the evaluations showed:

• Chatham High School: 92 effective teachers; 97 total teachers
• Chatham Middle School: 63 effective teachers, 71 total teachers
• Lafayette Avenue School: 37 effective teachers, 12 highly effective teachers; 50 total teachers
• Milton Avenue School: 20 effective teachers; 26 total teachers
• Washington Avenue School: 14 effective teachers, 16 highly effective teachers; 30 total teachers
• Southern Boulevard School: 18 effective teachers, 15 highly effective teachers; 33 total teachers

The majority of teachers across the state evaluated well, the DOE reported, but there were still a percentage of teachers that would need further training or changes in their instruction techniques.

According to the report, some 2,900 teachers – providing instruction to more than 180,000 students that school year – across the state were considered ineffective or partially effective, the state noted. As a result of those ratings, AchieveNJ requires those teachers to receive extra support and demonstrate progress over time to earn or maintain tenure, the report said.

“The real story of the first year of AchieveNJ,” said Peter Shulman, Assistant Commissioner of Education and Chief Talent Officer in a press release, “is that educators have risen to the challenge of improving feedback for all teachers and leaders. While one year of this new data is insufficient for identifying sustained trends or making sweeping conclusions about the state’s teaching staff, we are proud of this significant improvement and the personalized support all educators are now receiving.”

See the rankings of every school in the state here.

What do you think of the evaluations? Are they higher than you expected? Lower? Tell us in the comments.