Crime & Safety

North Kingstown Vicious Dog Case Heads to Superior Court

A local judge has ruled that Constitutional issues being raised are outside the scope of the Municipal Court.

North Kingstown Municipal Court Judge Joseph B. White on Wednesday sent a court case involving a pair of family pit bulls being held at the North Kingstown Animal Shelter to Superior Court.

Town officials say the dogs, -- Ozzy and Balou -- lived with another pit bull and owner and North Kingstown resident Kristy Miserendino, her boyfriend and mother.

A hearing panel last month deemed two of the three dogs vicious after they reportedly nipped or bit a passerby outside their Hickory Drive home. The family was told they could keep the dogs if they agreed to a series of requirements that included obtaining insurance, posting warning signs, keeping the dogs in an enclosed area and leashed and muzzled while off the property.

Find out what's happening in North Kingstownfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Miserendino complied with the instructions but about a month later, the family got a letter from the North Kingstown Police Department informing them that a local ordinance barring vicious dogs within a mile of a school or daycare facility meant the dogs must be removed from the house, which is within a mile of the South County Montessori School on Tower Hill Road.

Ozzy and Balou were seized and are currently being held at the North Kingstown Animal Shelter pending the Wednesday hearing during which Mark B. Morse, ACLU volunteer attorney who filed an appeal on behalf of Miserendino, said that the local ordinance is unconstitutional, the Providence Journal reported.

Find out what's happening in North Kingstownfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

White determined that the mere mention of Constitutionality meant the matter must head to Superior Court as the local Municipal Court addresses only local ordinances.

Morse also argued that the owners’ due process rights were violated when the town seized the dogs after they had complied with the state vicious dog panel decision.

Town prosecutor Don Maroney told the judge that the vicious dog panel and the ordinance were separate findings, the Journal reported.

Maroney said the family is being charged $20 per day pending the outcome of the case. The family now owes the town about $800 and could face fines of $6,500 for being in violation of the vicious dog school proximity ordinance.

Miserendino, in a statement last month issued by the ACLU announcing their involvement in the case, said that the whole incident has taken a toll on the family.

“After complying with all state laws, our dogs were returned to us after being held at the pound for almost thirty days,” she said. “More than a month later, we were given ten days to move out of our home or kill our dogs. On October 15th, my children witnessed the town coming to my home at 7:30 am with a search warrant to seize our dogs, and to this day they remain at the shelter. It would break our hearts if we were forced to euthanize our dogs over this unfortunate incident.”

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.