Health & Fitness
Southland Church Loses Bid To Overturn Ban On Indoor Singing
Harvest Rock, which has churches across the state, argued that the health order restricting indoor singing violates religious liberty.
LOS ANGELES, CA — A Pasadena-based church lost its bid in court to overturn Gov. Gavin Newsom's ban on singing and chanting indoors in places of worship during the pandemic, according to court papers obtained Friday.
Harvest Rock, which has 162 member churches statewide took the ban to court alleging it discriminated against the religious freedom clause of the First Amendment. Faith groups have been among the most active groups in challenging health orders in court as an infringement upon liberties. Harvest Rock, which has campuses across Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties, contended in court that it "cannot fulfill its vital ministry and sincere religious beliefs without gathering together in person, and that it cannot effectively engage in its constitutionally protected free exercise of religion on the internet."
The order stems from findings that indoor singing can serves as "super-spreading" events where unknowingly infected singers project the virus in aerosols that can spread more than six feet indoors. One of the earliest known super spreading events occurred in March at a church choir practice in Washington where 32 members contracted the virus, and two died from COVID-19, according to the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention.
Find out what's happening in Los Angelesfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II sided with the government, denying the motion in Los Angeles federal court, and the church appealed to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which denied the request in a 2 to 1 ruling Thursday.
The majority of the panel held that the state's health restrictions on churches did not discriminate against religious expression.
Find out what's happening in Los Angelesfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
California's orders apply to worship services as they do to other indoor events, such as lectures and movie theaters, according to the appellate order, while some activities are "completely prohibited in every county, such as attending concerts and (spectator) sporting events."
Liberty Counsel, a Florida law firm that defends Evangelical churches, filed the case on behalf of Harvest Rock Church and Harvest International Ministry and now plans to file its brief on the merits of the request for a preliminary injunction, which remains undecided by the appellate panel.
Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel founder and chairman, said the church is grateful for the panel's dissenting vote and looks forward "to the next round at the Court of Appeals on the full merits of our request to block the First Amendment violations. While the virus does not discriminate between nonreligious and religious gatherings, Gov. Newsom does."
Although Harvest Rock Church says it encourages parishioners to physically distance, wear face coverings and get their temperatures checked, it has held indoor services over the summer.
In a Sunday service in July that was livestreamed on YouTube, Harvest Rock Pastor Che Ahn asked congregants to pray to win the case, which he described as a battle against the "demonic forces trying to shut down the church in America."
Newsom's press office previously declined comment on the lawsuit.
Guidelines issued by the state Department of Public Health, through Newsom, discourage singing or chanting indoors due to fears that it increases the spread of respiratory droplets, thus increasing the risk of spreading COVID- 19 among a crowd.
The church maintains that in times of "trouble and distress," congregants "are to sing to the Lord even more and to sing aloud to him," according to its 74-page suit.
Staver alleges that public health guidelines unfairly target places of worship over other institutions because Newsom supported protests over George Floyd's in-custody death and police brutality that included chanting during the pandemic.
"The governor cannot claim a compelling, legitimate or even rational interest in his orders when he has permitted and encouraged mass gatherings of thousands of protesters to engage in the very activity he claims poses a massive danger to California if it takes place in plaintiff's churches," the suit states.
A similar lawsuit by three places of worship in the Southland was lodged in April in Los Angeles against Newsom and state Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
Deemed a nonessential service, churches were closed in March amid Newsom's stay-at-home orders. Restrictions subsequently eased and houses of worship were given approval to welcome worshipers, provided they followed health and safety guidelines limiting attendance.
In-person services are permitted if proper measures, including social distancing and use of masks, are followed, and all houses of worship are required to limit attendance to 25% of building capacity or a maximum of 100 attendees.
The church contends that failure to gather in person for religious worship services "is disobedience to the Lord for which (the church) will be held divinely accountable."
City News Service and Patch Staffer Paige Austin contributed to this report.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.