Should We Intervene in Syria?

Should the United States intervene in Syria? 

In 1860, France intervened in Lebanon to protect the Maronites from slaughter, a defense of “the right of mankind as a whole” argument.  But what about Syria? 

I think the French argument has merit.  When Assad sent tanks against civilians and used human shields, I was reminded of Nazi Germany.  Something must be done, especially since China and Russia have prevented UN action.  But I disagree for now with sending in troops or arming the intifada.  That will just play into the hands of Assad and his Iranian friends.  

President Obama has once again proved to be a master of Foreign Affairs because he convinced the Arabs and Europeans to jointly fight a financial, economic and psychological war.   Syria is being squeezed. But is this enough?  

I suggest the allies enforce a no-fly zone, starting with Homs, send in convoys of humanitarian aid (meds and food, etc) and notify Syria that all tanks, artillery, military aircraft, naval vessels, etc will be fired on, if seen outside their bases – same for snipers.  The job will be tougher than in Libya much more so; but do it the world must.  Despots who slaughter their people need to know there is a limit to global patience. 

Hopefully the Generals in Damascus will see the light as their forces are degraded and push the despot out.

Editor's Note: This blog is the opinion of the writer and does not reflect the opinion of Patch.