Politics & Government
Massachusetts Lawmakers React To Syrian Airstrike
"War doesn't get any easier than launching a few Tomahawk missiles," one congressman wrote. "Everything from here is harder."

Lawmakers in Massachusetts were blunt in their response to President Trump's ordered targeted military strike on an air base in Syria. The consensus? You should've asked us, and you better know what you're doing.
Reps. Joe Kennedy III, Seth Moulton, Jim McGovern, Katherine Clark, Mike Capuano and Bill Keating, as well as Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey – all Democrats – had some choice words for the president following the first direct U.S. military attack on the government of President Bashar al-Assad since the country's civil war began six years ago.
Kennedy, who represents Massachusetts' 4th District, said Assad's chemical weapons attack warranted a response, but "this country doesn't fight wars without giving the American people a say."
Find out what's happening in Beacon Hillfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
"Any plans for military engagement in Syria must come before their elected representatives in Congress for a debate and a vote," Kennedy wrote in a statement on Twitter. Read the congressman's full remarks below:
Assad's vicious brutality demands a response. But this country doesn't fight wars without giving the American people a say. More here: pic.twitter.com/ND1XB2lVDA
— Rep. Joe Kennedy III (@RepJoeKennedy) April 7, 2017
McGovern, Massachusetts' 2nd District representative, also decried Assad's actions as "barbaric" but said in a statement, "every president must obtain congressional authorization to launch military strikes and Trump is no exception."
Find out what's happening in Beacon Hillfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
.@realDonaldTrump Any US military action against #Syria must be approved by Congress and be supported by our allies and the American people. My statement: pic.twitter.com/unc3pfErHG
— Jim McGovern (@RepMcGovern) April 7, 2017
Sens. Markey and Warren and Rep. Moulton, who represents Massachusetts' 6th District, stressed the importance of having a plan moving forward. Moulton – himself a veteran of the Iraq war – questioned the military strategy behind the strike and criticized the decision to use military action while scaling down acceptance of refugees.
So @POTUS cares enough about the Syrian people to launch 50 Tomahawks but not enough to let the victims of Assad find refuge & freedom here.
— Seth Moulton (@sethmoulton) April 7, 2017
"We cannot stand by in silence as dictators murder children with chemical weapons," read a statement from Moulton and Rep. Steve Russell, a Republican from Oklahoma. "We look forward to hearing the President present a plan for Syria to the American people, for Congress to agree on bipartisan action, and for America to partner with the world community to help bring this treacherous conflict to an end."
Moulton wrote on Twitter that "war doesn't get any easier than launching a few Tomahawk missiles."
War doesn't get any easier than launching a few Tomahawk missiles. Everything from here is harder and more complicated. We need a strategy.
— Seth Moulton (@sethmoulton) April 7, 2017
Warren and Markey cautioned against taking further action without first developing a concrete strategy.
"Expanded military intervention in Syria requires action by Congress," Warren said in a statement, according to MassLive. "If President Trump expects such an authorization, he owes the American people an explanation of his strategy to bring an end to the violence in Syria. We should not escalate this conflict without clear goals and a plan to achieve them."
The suffering of the Syrian people cannot cease without a concrete plan to ensure a diplomatic end to this civil war. #Syria My statement: pic.twitter.com/O3Q9L58KWe
— Ed Markey (@SenMarkey) April 7, 2017
Read additional statements from Massachusetts' representatives below.
Katherine Clark, 5th District:
The administration should reverse its callous stance against refugees, and military action shouldn't proceed w/o congressional authorization pic.twitter.com/5Nif4uMj0k
— Katherine Clark (@RepKClark) April 7, 2017
Mike Capuano, 7th District:
The Constitution gives Congress the sole authority to declare war. A missile strike on a sovereign nation is clearly an act of war.
— Rep. Michael Capuano (@RepMikeCapuano) April 7, 2017
Bill Keating, 9th District:
Statement on last night's missile strike in Syria. pic.twitter.com/LgfwNfjzU2
— Bill Keating (@USRepKeating) April 7, 2017
The U.S. launched Tomahawk missiles at the Syrian military's Shayrat Airfield on Thursday night in response to the Syrian government's chemical weapons attack earlier in the week.
Photo - Pentagon
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.