Politics & Government
Southampton Town Granted a Court Hearing on Sand Land Case: Supervisor
A June 3 hearing regards imposing "an immediate restraining order on Sand Land Corp. to stop the processing and selling of mulch."

SOUTHAMPTON, NY - Southampton Town has been granted a court hearing on June 3 to "impose an immediate restraining order on Sand Land Corp. to stop the processing and selling of mulch and other material from the site," according to a release sent out Friday by Southampton Town Supervisor Jay Schneiderman's office.
The town is asking for the order after Sand Land failed to comply with a decision issued by the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division on Wednesday, March 30, the release said.
The hearing was scheduled after a judge denied an initial request by Southampton Town to grant a temporary restraining order.
Find out what's happening in Southamptonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The court reversed an earlier decision by a lower court and supported the Southampton Town Zoning Board of Appeals' decision that Sandland’s ". . . right to maintain a nonconforming use does not include the right to expand or enlarge that use", and the expanded uses ”were not permitted," the town said.
The unanimous decision by the court further stated that "it was reasonable for the ZBA to conclude, in effect, that these ‘new uses’ constitute a ‘significant change’ from the non-conforming mine operation. . . Accordingly, the ( lower court) erred in annulling the ZBA’s determination," the release said.
Find out what's happening in Southamptonfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The June 3 hearing date will also address Sand Land’s request to allow them six months to remove mulch and other materials from the site. The town feels Sand Land should be prohibited from receiving, processing and selling mulch, concrete, asphalt, pavement, brick and stone into a concrete blend as per the March 30 court order
In its March decision, the New York State Supreme Court upheld a decision by the Southampton Town zoning board of appeals in regard to the proposed controversial Sand Land sand mining expansion.
Kathryn Garvin, Southampton Town assistant town attorney, argued the appeal on behalf of the Town.
“These cases present many legal challenges and are very difficult to successfully appeal,” Southampton Town Supervisor Jay Schneiderman said. “I am very impressed with the work done by Assistant Town Attorney Kathryn Garvin.”
The hot-button case began months ago under former Southampton Town Supervisor Anna Throne-Holst’s administration when a lower court overturned the ZBA's decision to deny the expanded uses to Sand Land.
“When the previous town board authorized this appeal, we were confident that the lower court decision would be overturned. My thanks to the town attorney’s office for a job well done," Throne-Holst said.
“This decision,” Schneiderman added, “upholds the original decision of the ZBA. I have high regard for the ZBA and for all our land use boards. This decision affirms that these boards serve our town well.”
The Sand Land issue has been in the news for months. Back in April, 2015, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation denied an application to expand the sand mine, located on Middle Line Highway, because of environmental concerns and past worker safety violations.
The issue first surfaced in 2014 when the operator of the mine, locally known as “Sand Land”, Wainscott Sand and Gravel Inc., went to renew the existing permits for the mine, which has been permitted since 1981.
This decision by the DEC’s Albany office reversed a previous ruling by the DEC’s Long Island office that the expansion would not impact the environment and did not need an extensive review.
After that decision was made, several officials, environmentalists and residents raised their voices and asked the DEC is reconsider at a public hearing led by a DEC administrative law judge.
The operators applied to expand the mine, which is currently covers 50 acres and is 80 feet deep, by 4.9 acres and 40 feet deeper than allowed under the State Mined Lands Reclamation Act Permit.
The president of the Group for the East End, Robert DeLuca, said that the organization also expressed concerns over the project, including the possibility for groundwater contamination and issues on the parcel, located in the aquifer protection overlay district.
John Tintle, owner of Wainscott Sand & Gravel, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.