This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Josh Hammer: Andrew Breitbart-Mark Zuckerberg Two-Way Street of Speech

The Breitbart Doctrine: 'Win the culture and you win the war.' 'If you control America's key opinion-making institutions you control voting'

Image credits as shown on bottom. Text and collage credits: this writer for MHProNews and this Patch.
Image credits as shown on bottom. Text and collage credits: this writer for MHProNews and this Patch.

From the Daily Signal to this writer for MHProNews and this eclectic series on this Patch is the following in Part I on changes at Facebook announced by Mark Zuckerberg. More on free speech, Andrew Breitbart, and Zuckerberg and other topics in Part II.

Part I

Commentary
Andrew Breitbart, Mark Zuckerberg and the Two-Way Street of Politics and Culture

Find out what's happening in Lakelandfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Josh Hammer | January 11, 2025
The late, great Andrew Breitbart was one of the most quotable conservatives of his era. “Walk toward the fire,” he exhorted his fellow activists. “Don’t worry about what they call you. All those things are said against you because they want to stop you in your tracks.”

It was good advice when Breitbart said it during the contentious Barack Obama years, and it’s even better advice during the era of hyper-woke dogma today. But if Breitbart the man is singularly identified with any one line, it would undoubtedly be his well-known quip that “politics is downstream of culture.” Indeed, this pithy formulation became known as the “Breitbart Doctrine.”

Find out what's happening in Lakelandfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Breitbart, a native Angeleno who frequently inveighed against the fetid rot in his nearby Hollywood, was a culture warrior to his core. He correctly observed—and lamented—the immense power that comes with left-wing dominance of Hollywood, Silicon Valley, the academy, and sundry other formative civil society institutions.

The message of the Breitbart Doctrine was simple: Win the culture, and you win the war. If you control America’s key opinion-sculpting institutions, then you will eventually control opinion itself. And that, in turn, will inevitably translate into victory at the ballot box.

In all this, the sage of Brentwood was correct. But what if the Breitbart Doctrine wasn’t actually complete? What if it was missing half the picture?

While politics is downstream of culture, it ought to be self-evident that culture is also downstream of politics.

For millennia, Western rulers have understood that political (and judicial) power and rhetoric can, and do, affect the culture and the ways that people think. Ralph Lerner, the longtime University of Chicago political philosopher, famously referred to the U.S. Supreme Court as a “republican schoolmaster”—as the American institution intended to be “an educator, molder, and guardian of the manners, morals, and beliefs that sustain republican government.”

George Will’s 1983 book, “Statecraft as Soulcraft,” advanced a similar theme for political statesmanship. What is politics, after all, if not the use of power, however hard or soft, to stir our sensibilities and our very souls?

Consider, for instance, former first lady Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” initiative. “Just Say No” was a concerted government effort to use political rhetoric, messaging, and soft power to change American culture—specifically Americans’ views on drug use. The campaign was remarkably successful.

In 1979, just before Ronald Reagan’s crushing defeat of the feckless Jimmy Carter, a whopping 14.1% of Americans reported using drugs. Then, during the Reagan presidency, William Bennett became America’s first “drug czar,” the first lady led “Just Say No,” and the aligned nonprofit Partnership for a Drug-Free America created a now-famous public service advertisement, “This is your brain on drugs.” By the end of the George H.W. Bush presidency in 1993, drug use had dropped by 60%.

Politics and culture thus constitute something of a two-way street: Each is both downstream and upstream of the other. Both politics and culture are crucially important, and each of them greatly affects the other.

The latest reminder of the “two-way street” nature of the politics-culture relationship came this week from an unexpected source: Mark Zuckerberg, the ultra-billionaire founder of Facebook and CEO of parent company Meta. During the 2020 election, $400 million of Zuck’s eponymous “Zuckerbucks” were funneled to help elect Democrats and advance like-minded left-wing causes.
But Zuck now seems to be on an elaborate mea culpa tour. This week, he followed his surprising August 2024 letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, in which he expressed “regret” for Facebook’s role in previous censorship decisions, by announcing the termination of all “fact-checking” programs—a euphemism for censorship of conservative speech. In its stead, Zuck has vowed to instead implement grassroots “community notes,” as Elon Musk has done on X.

It is unlikely that Zuckerberg’s about-face, which also includes the recent promotion of former George W. Bush White House Deputy Chief of Staff Joel Kaplan to the prominent role of Meta president of global affairs, was done with purity of heart.

There are two motivating factors.

First, and less salient, is Zuckerberg’s likely jealousy of the coziness that his fellow ultra-billionaire technologist, Musk, has with Donald Trump. Second, and more important, Zuck, who recently jetted off to Palm Beach to dine with the maestro of Mar-a-Lago himself, is now scrambling to get on Trump’s good side—or at least avoid his bad side. Zuck knows that Trump, who leads a nationalist-populist political movement, does not instinctually view Big Tech favorably. It was Trump’s own Department of Justice, after all, that first filed the sweeping—and still active—antitrust suit against Google.

But whatever the motive, Zuckerberg has now bent the knee to meet the Trumpian moment. Politics affected culture—this time, before the politician even formally retook power.

---

Josh Hammer, a syndicated columnist, is senior editor-at-large at Newsweek and a research fellow with the Edmund Burke Foundation. He also is counsel and policy adviser for the Internet Accountability Project and contributing editor for Anchoring Truths.


We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

Part II - Additional information, insights, observations and topics

This writer's view of Zuckerberg is a bit like my take on Elon Musk. A measure of skepticism is warranted. Musk may have made a critical difference in the former and future President Trump 2024 win. But Zuckerberg played a signficant role in the Trump 2020 loss and the fallout that followed.

https://patch.com/florida/lakeland/report-biden-harris-federal-agencies-spent-millions-torturing-cats
https://patch.com/florida/lake...

Hammer is correct in saying that it is a two way street - culture influences politics. Politics influence culture. It could go further. Education influence politics, while politics influence education. Media influences politics and politics influence media. Religion influences politics and politics influences religion. And so on. I could pick different headings in this Patch series other than politics for these columns in several cases. Because life is holistic, different parts of life obviously influence each other. Or as a successful friend of ours likes to say, Success is a 360 degree endevor that includes health, faith, profession, and more.

But let's turn that notion on its head for a moment to make a point.

Imagine a man that is financially successful. Picture Warren Buffett, for example. A self-proclaimed atheist. If he had many times his $100 billion plus in wealth, all the power his money could buy, all the sex, all the indulgences that wealth and fame could give him, but if he died and went to hell eternally, would it have been worth it?

Some might think, yes. But eternity is a long, long, endless time. So, even if Buffett lived for 200 years, my mind says, no, it is not worth it. God's plan is best.

This life is passing for us all. We better have one eye on the future. Some will not get justice in this life, but they will in the next. That's guaranteed.

> USA Today - David Plouffe and Dem Advisers on Kamala Harris Revelation

> Majority OK Trump Transition-Mass Deportations-Tariffs- Is it Hopeful?

> Niskanen Center Praises Manufactured Home ‘Cost Savings’ and ‘Quality’

> Alice Carter-The Northern Forum-Deporting Immigrants & Housing Crisis

> Cartoons-Kamala Day 1, DOGE the Swamp, Brainwashing, & Out In the Cold

---

> The Creepy Line-Peter Schweizer-Dr. Jordan Peterson-Dr. Robert Epstein

> Secret State Miniseries - Fictional TV Series Shed Light on Reality

> Trump Transition Team Asked to Prioritize Affordable Housing Issues

> Top 10 States for Homelessness & Top Cities for Crime=Shocking Lessons

> WashPost-American Dream Fades But Assoc CEO Mark Weiss Shows Solution

---

> Why do Liars Lie? Why do those Engaged in Paltering and Spin Palter?

> Controversy-Manufactured Housing Institute-Lesli Gooch-Mark Bowersox

> ‘Mobile Home Values Rising Faster Than Single-Family’ House-Wow Fact$

> Realtor-What Is a Manufactured Home? The Next Step Beyond Mobile Homes

> Orlando RE Agent Smith-Younger Adults Will Need $8500 Monthly for Rent

---

> Blankley-Goodbye American Dream? Only 10% Polled Can Buy a House; But

> Frank Rolfe-Special Interests ‘Don’t Want to Solve Affordable Housing'

> TARK-‘I’m a Teen and Know the Solution to Affordable Housing Crisis’

---> Renting? Rent too High? Odds Are DOJ Suit vs RealPage Matters to You

> New-Certified “Half Price Homes” - Affordable Housing Solution Redux

---

> Solution: “Would-Be Homebuyers Need 80% More Income Than 4 Years Ago”

L. A. “Tony” Kovach is a publisher who has earned multiple awards in history. He and his family live in a manufactured home on private property in Winter Haven, FL. He is the co-founder of Manufactured Home Living News.com (MHLivingNews.com) and Manufactured Home Pro News.com (MHProNews.com), trade publications serving segments of the manufactured home industry. Having worked in several segments of the manufactured home industry for over 3 decades, Kovach is a widely acknowledged and often praised expert on manufactured housing. ###

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?