Politics & Government
License Plate Readers at Center of Legal Dispute in Fairfax County
ACLU is defending a Fairfax County man who says police department is unlawfully collecting information on law-abiding Virginians.

This week, a little known technological advance used by police ā automatic license plate readers ā was front and center after alleged killer Vester Lee Flanagan was caught on Interstate 66 in Northern Virginia by a state trooper who used the technology.
The technology is at the center of a case brought again the Fairfax County Police by a local resident who is being represented by the ACLU.
Today, Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Grace Carroll denied the Fairfax County Police Departmentās request to dismiss the case, brought by the ACLU challenging the FCPDās use of automatic license plate readers to āunlawfully collect the personal information of law-abiding Virginians,ā according to a news release from the Virginia ACLU.
Find out what's happening in Kingstowne-Rose Hillfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court, the lawsuit is being brought on behalf of Fairfax CountyĀ resident Harrison Neal, who, the ACLU says, discovered that his license plate had been scanned twice in one year and stored in a database, even though he wasnāt part of any police investigation.
Neal is represented by ACLU of Virginia staff attorney Hope Amezquita and ACLU of Virginia cooperating attorneys Edward Rosenthal and Christina Brown of the Alexandria firm Rich Rosenthal Brincefield Manitta Dzubin & Kroeger, LLP.
Find out what's happening in Kingstowne-Rose Hillfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
āThis case is simple,ā said Rebecca Glenberg, legal director of the ACLU of Virginia. āOur laws make clear that law-abiding Virginians should be free to travel around the Commonwealth without police departments tracking, storing, and sharing their vehicleās movements with other law enforcement agencies. We thank Judge Carroll for allowing this case to move forward.ā
The ACLU chapter noted in a news release that: āInstead of reforming its policies to ensure against the passive collection of the movements of law-abiding Virginians, the FCPD sought to have the case dismissed by arguing that the information collected about our client and his vehicle is not personal information, and therefore does not violate the Virginia Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act.ā
āFairfax County Police Departmentās use of automatic license plate readers to compile vast databases of peopleās movements in their vehicles is precisely the kind of intrusive practice the Virginia Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act was meant to prevent,ā said Claire Guthrie GastaƱaga, executive director of the ACLU of Virginia. āBy compiling a history of your vehicleās movements in local and regional databases, law enforcement can use algorithms to predict your movements and determine your friends, politics, and medical conditions.ā
Modern technology can be used to enhance public safety, but only if proper policies are in place, according to the ACLU.
āAs we saw on Wednesday when the Virginia State Police used an automatic license plate reader to locate the individual suspected of killing two Roanoke journalists, when used correctly modern technology can be used to make us safer,ā said GastaƱaga.
āOur client is not asking for the Fairfax County Police Department to stop using automatic license plate readers for active criminal investigations or for Amber or Blue Alerts. In those cases, the technology serves a valuable law enforcement purpose. Heās just asking that the Fairfax County Police Department stop using automatic license plate readers to collect everyone elseās data too.ā
Nealās Complaint and Response to Demurrer and Fairfax Countyās Memorandum in Support of Demurrer can be found here.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.