Crime & Safety

Superior Court Judge Denies Request To Suppress Evidence In Concord Double-Murder Case: Follow-Up

Judge John Kissinger said evidence against Logan Clegg in the Stephen and Djeswende Reid murder case would have been found lawfully.

The entrance to the Profile Avenue Trail Connector, center left, where Logan Clegg, lower right, had a campsite before burning his tent and fleeing Concord after the double murder of Stephen and Djeswende Reid, upper right, April 18, 2022.
The entrance to the Profile Avenue Trail Connector, center left, where Logan Clegg, lower right, had a campsite before burning his tent and fleeing Concord after the double murder of Stephen and Djeswende Reid, upper right, April 18, 2022. (Tony Schinella/Patch; Concord Police Department)

CONCORD, NH — A Merrimack County Superior Court judge has ruled evidence used in the prosecution of a homeless man who killed a Concord couple in 2022 remains admissible under the legal doctrine of inevitable discovery, following a remand from the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

Judge John Kissinger Jr., in a 40-page ruling, said, “after carefully” considering the parties’ arguments, Clegg’s motion to suppress evidence tied to his 2023 convictions for second-degree murder, falsifying physical evidence and being a felon in possession of a firearm in the deaths of Stephen and Djeswende (Wendy) Reid, was denied.

The Supreme Court previously ruled the trial court had erred in relying on exigent circumstances to justify warrantless requests for cellphone data from Verizon. The high court sent the case back to the trial court to determine whether the evidence would have been admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine.

Find out what's happening in Concordfor free with the latest updates from Patch.


Read the decision linked here.


Prior to the trial, the court held a three-day evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress evidence and an unrelated motion to suppress statements.

Find out what's happening in Concordfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Police, while searching for the Reids, encountered a homeless camper in Concord with the name of “Arthur Kelly,” for whom dispatch could find no information. After the Reids’ bodies were found, the campsite of Kelly, later ID’d as Clegg, had been cleared, and he, essentially, vanished.

Nearly six months later, police learned Clegg purchased a bus ticket from Boston, Massachusetts, to Vermont in Kelly’s name. On Oct. 11, police learned Clegg had booked a flight to Berlin, Germany, scheduled for 12:30 a.m. on Oct. 14, 2022. The cellphone number and mailing address in the flight information led police to Vermont to search for Clegg, as did pings from his cellphone. Pings were found in the Centennial Woods area of the city, as well as his association with the Price Chopper grocery store and the public library, where he was later arrested on Oct. 12, 2022.

Clegg possessed a Glock 9 mm handgun loaded with Sig Luger 9 mm rounds, which were consistent with the bullets in the killings of the Reids.

After being arrested, Centennial Woods was searched by police, and Clegg’s homeless campsite was “quickly” found.

Clegg’s legal team, however, argued the admissions by police essentially amounted to “if we hadn’t done it wrong, we would have done it right[.]”

After reviewing evidence from earlier hearings and additional testimony presented in April, Kissinger concluded police would have obtained the same cellphone records through a search warrant even if they had not used Verizon’s emergency request process. He said investigators showed good faith by seeking the records without a warrant because they believed the process would not provide information quickly enough to locate Clegg before a scheduled international flight. Kissinger wrote police mistakenly believed obtaining a warrant and using the company’s emergency hotline were mutually exclusive, but he found no evidence that investigators deliberately violated Clegg’s constitutional rights. The judge also found evidence recovered from Clegg’s backpack at the time of his arrest at the library and from a campsite in Burlington would have been discovered through lawful means.

Concord police investigators’ fears were Clegg was “uniquely dangerous,” and they were concerned “he might commit another similar crime before leaving the country,” prompting “a particular sense of urgency to act” on the information since Clegg “had murdered two strangers for no apparent reason.”

In the order, Kissinger wrote that the state had shown it was “practically certain” the evidence would have been obtained legally, and police “did not act in bad faith to accelerate the discovery of evidence.” The public interest in allowing jurors to consider relevant evidence outweighed the need to exclude the evidence because of the constitutional violation identified by the Supreme Court, he said, denying Clegg’s motion to suppress.

The ruling leaves intact the evidence underlying Clegg’s convictions while preserving issues for any future appellate review.

The New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office issued a statement saying, “We are pleased with the court’s ruling. The defendant has a right to appeal this ruling to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and out of respect for the process we will have no further comment.”

Evidence Appeal Coverage

Prosecutors Try To Justify Concord Police Illegal Searches In Clegg Double Murder Case

Cops Didn’t Get Warrant For Concord Murder Suspect’s Phone Data: Docs

State Plans New Testimony In Clegg's Murder Convictions; Submits 6 Potential Witnesses

Prosecutors Get Evidence Do-Over In Concord Couples' Murders

NH Supreme Court Vacates Clegg’s Denial Of Motion To Suppress Evidence In Reid Double Murder Case

Patch Trial Coverage

Prior Patch Coverage

Do you have a news tip? Email it to tony.schinella@patch.com. View videos on Tony Schinella's YouTube or Rumble channels. Patch in New Hampshire is now in 217 communities — and expanding every day. Also, follow Patch on Google Discover.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.